An Analysis of Serious Occupational Diseases and Poisoning to Agricultural Workers in Florida During a Three-Year Period, 1987-1989
Click here to view a PDF version of this document.
Home Search What's New Products Survey Help
An Analysis of Serious Occupational Diseases and Poisoning to Agricultural Workers in Florida During a Three-Year Period, 1987-1989

   

An Analysis of Serious Occupational Diseases and Poisoning to Agricultural Workers in Florida During a Three-Year Period, 1987-19891

William J. Becker2

During the three-year period, 1987-1989, the Division of Workers' Compensation reported that there was a total of 8,715 serious occupational injuries or illnesses to agricultural workers in the State of Florida. A serious occupational injury or illness is one that keeps a worker off the job for one week or longer.

Among these 8,715 serious accidents, there was a total of 117 cases of occupational diseases and poisoning, or 1.34 percent of all the serious accidents. This report analyzes these 117 cases.

DISTRIBUTION OF THE ACCIDENTS

Table 1. Number of occupational diseases and poisonings by year

Year

Number

1987

19

1988

18

1989

80(40)

Total

117

Over 50 percent of the accidents occurred in one year, as shown in Table 1 ; of these, 50 percent occurred in one accident in 1989. Forty cases were in one accident, where workers were overcome by pesticide poisoning in a vegetable field. The field had been sprayed the evening before, with a product requiring a 24-hour re-entry period. This re-entry was violated and 40 employees were seriously affected. (As a result, the agri-business lost its restricted pesticide use license and was fined the maximum under the existing rules and regulations.)

Other than this one serious accident, there is no explanation for the increase in serious occupational diseases and poisonings over the preceding two years.

The 117 serious cases were widely distributed across the State of Florida, with at least one serious accident in 26 of the State's 67 counties. With the exception of one county that had 44 serious accidents (40 in the one accident) no other county had more than six such accidents over the three-year period.

NATURE OF OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND ILLNESSES

The majority of the serious occupational diseases and poisonings are from pesticides, but not all. Table 2 provides information on the nature of these injuries and illnesses. Skin and respiratory system diseases make up the majority (68.4 percent) of the injuries and illnesses.

Table 2. Nature of occupational injuries and illnesses

Nature

Number

Percent

Skin Disease

43

36.8

Respiratory Disease

37

31.6

Other Diseases

9

7.7

Poisonings

8

6.8

Unknown

20

17.1

Totals

117

100.00

TYPES OF OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND ILLNESSES

Direct contact/absorption and inhalation are the two major types of injury and illness, as shown in Table 3 , accounting for 99, or 84.6 percent of the serious injuries and illnesses. Ingestion caused another four injuries or illnesses. The remaining 14 cases were other or unknown, including drownings.

Table 3. Types of occupational injuries and illness

Type

Number

Percent

Direct Contact

67

57.3

Inhalation

32

27.4

Ingestion

4

3.4

Unknown

14

11.9

Totals

117

100.00

AGENTS OF INJURY OF OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND ILLNESSES

Table 4 summarizes the agents of injury for the 117 serious occupational injuries and illnesses which occurred during the three-year period. Pesticides account for 70.1 percent of these. Other hazardous chemicals account for 20.5 percent. Snake and insect bites, fungus infections and drownings are the remaining agents of injury.

Table 4. Agents of occupational injuries and illnesses

Agent

Number

Percent

Chemical & Pesticide

27

23.1

Poison & Infection

20

17.1

Insecticides

15

12.8

Other

20

17.1

Total

82

70.1

Hazardous Chemicals

24

20.5

Total


106

90.6

Other: snake, insect, fungus

11

9.4

Total


117

100.00

BODY PART AFFECTED BY OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND ILLNESSES

Table 5 indicates that of the 117 serious accidents in the occupational disease category 82, or 70.1 percent, are pesticide-related. These injuries or illnesses are nearly equally divided between internal (42) and external (40) problems, with the respiratory system and the skin most often being the affected body parts.

Table 5. Body Parts affected by occupational injuries and illnesses

Body Part

Number

Percent

By Pesticides



Respiratory

36

30.8

Gastro-intestinal

4

3.4

Nervous

2

1.7

Total Internal

42

35.9

Skin

36

30.8

Eyes

4

3.4

Total External

40

34.2

Total Pesticide

82

70.1

Other Chemicals

24

20.5

Occupational Diseases

11

9.4

Total External

(Except two drownings)


35

29.9

Totals

117

100.00

All the other hazardous chemical injuries and occupational diseases were external rashes, burns, bites or infections, except for two drownings.

SUMMARY

During the three-year period, 1987-89, Florida had 8,715 serious accidents among the agricultural work force. Of these, only 117 or 1.34 percent were classified as occupational diseases and poisonings. Pesticides were associated with 82 of these serious accidents; thus, only 0.94 percent of all serious agricultural accidents were pesticide-related. In addition, 40 of these 82 serious injuries were the result of one catastrophic accident. Without this one accident, the three-year rate would have been less than one-half percent of all the serious agricultural accidents.

EDITORIAL

The author is of the opinion that Florida agriculture is not unique among states in the type and number of pesticide accidents. Our state is ranked as one of the highest users of pesticide by any given measure. It follows, then, that other states would have a pesticide-accident rate equal to or lower than the State of Florida. National Safety Council data support this conclusion. Florida's problem, however, is not pesticides, it is the hysteria and paranoia generated by various organizations and agencies and by the press.

Why is agriculture's pesticide safety record so good? There are two primary reasons: first, Federal and state regulations have demanded safer products, safer transport, storage, mixing, loading, application and disposal; secondly, the chemical companies, cooperative extension service and various agricultural organizations have done an excellent job of training and retraining pesticide handlers and users at all levels, with the possible exception of the urban gardener.

What agriculture needs, in the area of health and safety, is not more rules, regulation and training with pesticides; but, rather, a national commitment to develop rules, regulations and training to impact the truly significant agricultural safety problems of:

There are other problems, also: livestock, power and hand tools, stress, alcoholism, and fires, to name a few. But, any study of agricultural accidents will show that pesticides, poisons or other hazardous chemicals are at or near the bottom of the list.

Let us place our agricultural safety problems in proper priority, and then use our limited resources to address the real safety problems of the farm worker and the farm family.


Footnotes

1. This document is AE102, one of a series of the Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date November 1991. Reviewed June 2003. Visit the EDIS Web Site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2. 2.Professor and Extension Safety Specialist, Agricultural Engineering Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Larry Arrington, Dean.



Copyright Information

This document is copyrighted by the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) for the people of the State of Florida. UF/IFAS retains all rights under all conventions, but permits free reproduction by all agents and offices of the Cooperative Extension Service and the people of the State of Florida. Permission is granted to others to use these materials in part or in full for educational purposes, provided that full credit is given to the UF/IFAS, citing the publication, its source, and date of publication.