Chapter 5. Russet- Skinned Fresh Market Potato Variety Trial, 2006 Chapter 5. Russet- Skinned Fresh Market Potato Variety Trial, 2006
Chapter 5. Russet- Skinned Fresh Market Potato Variety Trial, 20061
C.M. Hutchinson and Doug Gergela2
General Comments: A goal of the Russet-Skinned Fresh Market Potato Variety trial is to identify a short-season russet skinned variety that produces a marketable crop under short-day production. Successful russet varieties could be grown for processing or for the fresh market. There is no current standard for North Florida production.
Planting Information
Planting Site
PSREU - Hastings Farm, Hastings, FL
Planting Date
January 31, 2006
Vine Kill Date
April 28, 2006
Harvest Date
May 30, 2006
Season Length
87 days planting to vine kill; 119 days planting to harvest
Fertilizer Program
preplant, 100-43-86 lb/A; sidedress, 65-0-56 lb/A; (2 appl.)
Irrigation Program
seepage
Experimental Design
Number of Varieties
7 (Standard: Goldrush)
Number of Clones
1
Within Row Spacing
8 in (20 cm)
Between Row Spacing
40 in (102 cm)
Replications
4
Plot Size
16 ft (4.9 m)
Production Statistics
Early Vigor Ratings
41 days after planting
Highest Total Yield
Goldrush (331 cwt/acre or 37.1 MT/ha)
Highest Marketable Yield
Goldrush (223 cwt/acre or 25.0 MT/ha)
Best Appearance Rating
Goldrush, Amey, Belrus and Ranger Russet (7.0, good to excellent)
Tables
Table 2. Production statistics for Russet-Skinned potato selections.
Total
Marketable Yield1
Size
Size Class
Yield
% of
Distribution by Class (%)2
Range (%)
Specific
Clone
(cwt/A)
(cwt/A)
standard
C
B
A1
A2
A3
A4
A1 to A3
A2 to A3
Gravity
Goldrush
331
223
100
1
19
74
6
0
0
80
6
1.066
Amey
221
178
80
1
14
84
1
0
0
85
1
1.074
Belrus
247
153
69
1
18
78
3
0
0
81
3
1.073
Ranger Russet
269
176
79
1
24
74
1
0
0
75
1
1.069
Russet Burbank
300
134
60
3
45
52
0
0
0
52
0
1.066
Russet Norkotah
193
31
14
5
57
38
0
0
0
38
0
1.058
Umatilla Russet
283
146
65
2
40
58
0
0
0
58
0
1.070
B2232-3
220
128
57
2
27
71
0
0
0
71
0
1.073
MSD3
55
80
ns
ns
12
ns
0
0
14
ns
0.003
P Value
0.0004
0.0261
0.0877
0.0666
0.0376
0.0818
-
-
0.0475
0.0818
0.0001
1Marketable Yield: size classes A1 to A3. 2Size classes: C = .5 to 1.5" , B = 1.5 to 1 7/8", A1 = 1 7/8 to 2.5", A2 = 2.5 to 3.25", A3 = 3.25 to 4", A4 = >4"
3Means separated within columns by Tukey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test.
Table 3. Plant growth and tuber characteristics of Russet-Skinned potato selections.
Plant Growth Characteristics1
Tuber Characteristics2
%
Early
Vine
Vine
Clone
Stand
Vigor
Type
Maturity
IFC
SC
ST
TS
ED
APP
Tuber Comments
Goldrush
96
5.5
8.8
8.3
2.0
4.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
7.0
sl. skinned
Amey
99
5.8
8.3
7.3
2.0
4.0
2.0
4.0
7.0
7.0
attractive
Belrus
96
4.3
8.8
8.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
4.0
5.0
7.0
attractive
Ranger Russet
100
5.3
9.0
7.0
1.0
5.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
7.0
attractive
Russet Burbank
96
4.8
9.0
8.0
1.0
5.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
many shapes
Russet Norkotah
70
2.0
8.0
9.0
2.0
5.0
3.0
3.0
5.0
5.0
many shapes
Umatilla Russet
100
5.3
8.8
7.8
2.0
5.0
3.0
4.0
6.0
5.0
flat and pointy
B2232-3
99
4.3
7.3
7.8
1.0
4.0
2.0
4.0
7.0
6.0
sl. flat
1See rating system outlined in Chapter 1. 2See rating system outlined in Chapter 1.
Table 4. External and internal defects of Russet-Skinned potato selections.
% External Tuber Defects
% Internal Defects2
Growth
Mis-
Sun-
Rotten
Total
Brown Center
Clone
Cracks
shapen
burned
& misc.
Culls1
HH
BR
CRS
IHN
L
M
H
Goldrush
0
2
0
13
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Amey
0
0
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Belrus
0
1
1
22
23
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Ranger Russet
0
1
0
12
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Russet Burbank
0
2
0
14
16
1
0
0
0
6
6
0
Russet Norkotah
0
1
0
59
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Umatilla Russet
0
1
0
12
13
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
B2232-3
0
2
0
17
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MSD3
0
ns
ns
ns
ns
0
0
0
0
ns
0
0
P Value
-
0.0738
0.5493
0.3010
0.3027
-
-
-
-
0.4363
-
-
1Percent of Total Yield. Total culls include the sum of growth cracks, misshapen, sunburned and rotten/misc. 2Percent tubers; HH, hollow heart; BR, brown rot; CRS, corky ring spot; IHN, internal heat necrosis.
Brown Center: L = Light, M = Moderate, H = Heavy
3Means separated within columns by Tukey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test.
Footnotes
1. This document is HS1090, one of a series of the Horticultural Sciences Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date June, 2007. Visit the EDIS Web Site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.2. Chad M. Hutchinson, Associate Professor, Doug Gergela, Sr. Biological Scientist, Horticultural Sciences Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611.
The use of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information. UF/IFAS does not guarantee or warranty the products named, and references to them in this publication do not signify our approval to the exclusion of other products of suitable composition. All chemicals should be used in accordance with directions on the manufacturer's label. Use pesticides safely. Read and follow directions on the manufacturer's label.
The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Larry Arrington, Dean.
Copyright Information
This document is copyrighted by the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) for the people of the State of Florida. UF/IFAS retains all rights under all conventions, but permits free reproduction by all agents and offices of the Cooperative Extension Service and the people of the State of Florida. Permission is granted to others to use these materials in part or in full for educational purposes, provided that full credit is given to the UF/IFAS, citing the publication, its source, and date of publication.