University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF 
Publication #HS1094

Chapter 10. Chipping Potato Variety Trial, 20061

C.M. Hutchinson and Doug Gergela2

Table 1. 
General Comments


A goal of the Chipping Potato Variety trial is to identify a short-season processing potato variety with better production and quality characteristics than Atlantic, the current standard.


Planting Information


Planting Site
PSREU - Hastings Farm, Hastings, FL
Planting Date
February 1, 2006
Harvest Date
May 16, 2006
Season Length
105 days


Fertilizer Program
preplant, 100-43-86 lb/A; sidedress, 65-0-56 lb/A; (2 appl.)
Irrigation Program
seepage


Experimental Design


Number of Varieties
8 (Standard: Atlantic)
Number of Clones
8


Within Row Spacing
8 in (20 cm)


Between Row Spacing
40 in (102 cm)


Replications
4


Plot Size
16 ft (4.9 m)


Production Statistics


Early Vigor Ratings
40 days after planting


Highest Total Yield
Fabula (541 cwt/acre or 60.6 MT/ha)
Highest Marketable Yield
Fabula (481 cwt/acre or 53.9 MT/ha)
Highest Specific Gravity
B1985-1 (1.097)



Tables

Table 25. Production statistics for Chipping potato selections.















Total


Marketable Yield1


Size


Size Class

Range (%)


Specific

Gravity



Yield



% of


Distribution by Class (%)2


Clone


(cwt/A)


(cwt/A)


standard


C


B


A1


A2


A3


A4


A1 to A3


A2 to A3


Atlantic (USDA)


407


373


100


1


6


56


29


8


0


93


37


1.091


Atlantic (MFX)


429


395


106


1


5


56


32


5


0


94


38


1.090


Andover


379


350


94


1


6


90


3


0


0


94


3


1.084


Fabula


541


481


129


1


7


73


17


2


0


93


19


1.069


Harley Blackwell


401


333


89


1


14


74


10


1


0


84


10


1.087


Sebago


467


398


107


1


11


72


13


3


0


88


16


1.073


Snowden


374


322


86


1


11


79


9


0


0


88


9


1.087


Suncrisp


428


362


97


1


11


75


12


1


0


87


13


1.084


B0766-3


431


393


105


1


6


55


27


11


0


93


38


1.080


B1985-1


303


219


59


2


23


73


3


0


0


76


3


1.097


B1992-106


501


448


120


1


6


71


20


2


0


93


22


1.087


B2280-86


392


349


93


1


9


78


12


0


0


90


12


1.090


B2445-4


477


370


99


0


4


69


24


2


0


95


26


1.074


BNC49-1


399


305


82


2


11


48


19


20


1


86


39


1.071


BNC49-2


501


461


123


1


4


39


43


13


0


95


56


1.086


BNC143-4


468


409


110


0


4


56


30


10


0


96


40


1.088


MSD3


114


117



1


8


17


13


10


ns


8


16


0.006


P Value


0.0001


0.0001



0.0042


0.0001


0.0001


0.0001


0.0001


0.4685


0.0001


0.0001


0.0001


1Marketable Yield: size classes A1 to A3.

2Size classes: C = .5 to 1.5" , B = 1.5 to 1 7/8", A1 = 1 7/8 to 2.5", A2 = 2.5 to 3.25", A3 = 3.25 to 4", A4 = >4"

3Means separated within columns by Tukey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test.





Table 26. Plant growth and tuber characteristics of Chipping potato selections.















Plant Growth Characteristics1


Tuber Characteristics2


Chip

Rating3




%


Early


Vine


Vine









Clone


Stand


Vigor


Type


Maturity


IFC


SC


ST


TS


ED


APP


1-5


Tuber Comments


Atlantic (USDA)


96


6.5


8.3


na


2.0


6.0


5.0


2.5


6.5


5.5


65.1


scab


Atlantic (MFX)


100


6.8


8.8


na


2.0


6.0


5.0


2.5


6.5


5.5


65.4


scab


Andover


99


7.5


8


na


1.0


6.0


5.0


3.0


5.5


5.5


67.1


some scab


Fabula


97


5.3


8


na


3.0


7.0


6.5


3.5


6.0


4.0


61.3


some lenticels, mishapen


Harley Blackwell


99


7.5


8-9


na


1.0


6.0


5.5


2.5


6.0


6.0


64.2


sl. flat


Sebago


93


7.3


8


na


1.0


7.0


6.0


3.5


6.0


5.0


64.8


lenticels


Snowden


100


7.0


8.8


na


2.0


6.0


5.0


2.5


6.0


6.0


69.3


sl. flat


Suncrisp


99


8.0


9


na


1.0


5.0


4.5


3.5


7.0


4.0


63.9


scab, flat, all shapes


B0766-3


96


8.0


6-9


na


1.0


6.0


5.0


3.0


6.5


5.0


67.6


scab


B1985-1


97


7.5


6-9


na


1.0


7.5


5.5


3.0


6.5


6.0


63.2


sl. flat


B1992-106


98


6.8


8.3


na


1.0


5.0


4.5


4.5


6.5


5.5


68.0


nice flesh


B2280-86


100


6.5


9-6


na


2.0


6.5


5.5


2.5


6.5


6.0


66.8


some lenticels


B2445-4


99


5.5


8.3


na


1.0


6.0


5.0


4.5


6.5


4.5


61.5


some mishapen


BNC49-1


95


6.5


8


na


2.0


6.0


5.5


2.5


7.0


5.5


66.7


some scab


BNC49-2


99


6.5


9


na


1.0


5.0


5.0


2.5


6.0


6.0


68.6


nice flesh


BNC143-4


96


7.8


8


na


4.0


5.5


5.0


2.5


6.0


6.0


63.2


sl. flat


1See rating system outlined in Table 1 (page 8).










2See rating system outlined in Table 2 (page 9).










3For rating scale, see general potato variety production information in Chapter 1. (page 5)



























































Table 27. External and internal defects of Chipping potato selections.















% External Tuber Defects


  • % Internal Defects2



Growth


Mis-


Sun-


Rotten


Total






Brown Center


Clone


Cracks


shapen


burned


& misc.


Culls1


HH


BR


CRS


IHN


L


M


H


Atlantic (USDA)


0


0


1


0


2


6


0


1


5


3


0


3


Atlantic (MFX)


0


0


2


0


2


0


0


0


4


1


4


3


Andover


0


0


1


1


1


0


0


0


0


0


0


0


Fabula


0


1


2


0


4


0


0


0


0


0


0


0


Harley Blackwell


0


0


1


0


1


0


0


0


0


0


0


0


Sebago


0


0


2


1


3


1


0


0


10


1


0


3


Snowden


0


0


2


0


2


0


0


0


0


0


0


0


Suncrisp


0


1


2


1


3


1


0


0


0


0


1


1


B0766-3


0


0


1


0


2


4


0


0


0


0


0


0


B1985-1


0


2


0


4


5


0


0


0


6


0


0


0


B1992-106


0


1


2


1


4


0


0


0


0


0


0


0


B2280-86


0


0


1


1


2


0


0


0


0


0


0


0


B2445-4


0


4


13


1


19


0


0


0


0


1


0


1


BNC49-1


1


0


2


8


11


6


0


0


3


4


3


6


BNC49-2


0


1


1


1


3


3


0


0


0


0


0


0


BNC143-4


0


2


4


3


9


10


0


0


8


0


0


0


MSD3


ns


3


4


4


8


8


0


0


11


ns


3


4


P Value


0.5629


0.0011


0.0001


0.0001


0.0001


0.0003


-


-


0.0233


0.1116


0.0427


0.0005


1Percent of Total Yield. Total culls include the sum of growth cracks, misshapen, sunburned and rotten/misc.

2Percent tubers; HH, hollow heart; BR, brown rot; CRS, corky ring spot; IHN, internal heat necrosis.

Brown Center: L = Light, M = Moderate, H = Heavy

3Means separated within columns by Tukey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test.






Footnotes

1. This document is HS1094, one of a series of the Horticultural Sciences Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date May, 2007. Visit the EDIS Web Site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2. Chad M. Hutchinson, Associate Professor, Doug Gergela, Sr. Biological Scientist, Horticurtural Sciences Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Insitute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611.


The use of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information. UF/IFAS does not guarantee or warranty the products named, and references to them in this publication does not signify our approval to the exclusion of other products of suitable composition. All chemicals should be used in accordance with directions on the manufacturer's label. Use pesticides safely. Read and follow directions on the manufacturer's label.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Larry Arrington, Dean.