Critical Issues for the Tomato Industry: Preventing a Rapid Postharvest Breakdown of the Fruit
Click here to view a PDF version of this document.
Home Search What's New Products Survey Help
Critical Issues for the Tomato Industry: Preventing a Rapid Postharvest Breakdown of the Fruit

   

Critical Issues for the Tomato Industry: Preventing a Rapid Postharvest Breakdown of the Fruit1

J. A. Bartz, S. A. Sargent and P. R. Gilreath2

What is rapid fruit breakdown? Rapidly growing lesions become visible within 12 to 18 hours after harvest and continue to develop among packed fruit in the ripening room. The lesions produce large amounts of fluid leading to wet patches appearing on the exterior of the cartons and the spread of decay within the box. Affected fruit are out-of-grade either prior to shipment or upon arrival at the receiver.

Brief History

Severe outbreaks of postharvest decay have occurred sporadically in the Florida and eastern U.S. tomato production areas for the past several years. During the summer of 2006, the problem was persistent in the production areas of Virginia and Maryland. In October, extensive losses occurred at the beginning of the harvest season in north Florida but disappeared within a few days. The decay losses feature a rapid breakdown of green fruit where lesions can appear within 18 hours of harvest. At the time ripening rooms are opened, packers observe lesions on fruit surfaces along with a release of fluids. Wet spots may appear on the lower part of cartons where the fluid has leaked.

Growers suggest that a condition called "tender fruit" leads to decay losses. The term "tender fruit" does not have a scientific definition, but to growers it means enhanced bruising during harvest. In 1964, R. S. Cox observed a field disorder, shoulder pox, on tomatoes produced in the lower east coast of Florida, which he attributed to the combination of tender fruit, cool moist weather and the application of certain pesticides. However, rapid fruit breakdown has usually occurred during or after warm, moist weather, which is also a likely promoter of fruit tenderness. A quick change in the weather from very warm, dry conditions to cooler temperatures featuring heavy fogs has also been associated with tender fruit. Conditions leading to tender fruit likely coincide with wet fields and moist plant canopies. This wetness promotes an increase in the populations of decay pathogens on the plants, and insect wounds and other types of injuries lead to infections. Moisture on fruit at the time of harvest readily disperses the pathogens to wounds. The common recommendation for avoiding decay issues associated with wet fields is "don't harvest if the plants have free moisture on them." However, at times, this may not be a viable option for growers either due to price, crop maturity or labor issues.

The following guide is intended as a quick checklist of suggestions for minimizing rapid breakdown of tomato fruit. This breakdown is normally caused by two postharvest diseases, bacterial soft rot and sour rot. Key symptoms and causes about each type of disease follow.

Soft Rot Bacteria (Bacterial Soft Rot)

CREDITS: S. R. Bartz

Figure 1. Bacterial soft rot - internal lesion. Bacteria entered into fruit under the stem attachment

CREDITS: S. R. Bartz

Figure 2. Bacterial soft rot - internal lesion. Bacteria entered through blossom-end scar of fruit.

CREDITS: S. R. Bartz

Figure 3. Bacterial soft rot - internal lesions. Internal view of bacterial soft rot that began at blossom and stem ends of fruit

Sour Rot Pathogens (Sour Rot)

CREDITS: M. J. Mahovic

Figure 4. Rain check. Dark checked areas are a severe form of cuticle cracking that develops in wet weather. The cracks enable attack by postharvest pathogens.

CREDITS: M. J. Mahovic

Figure 5. Sour rot - from natural outbreak. Dark, rough areas are rain checks. Fruit (upper right) has surface splitting due to decay spread in the carton.

CREDITS: P. R. Gilreath

Figure 6. Sour rot - internal lesions from natural outbreak. Rough fruit became infected through blossom-end scars and wounds. Tissues appear to be pickled with only a little evidence of fungal development at the surface.

CREDITS: M. J. Mahovic

Figure 7. Sour rot infection in green tomato involves high water content. An apparent bruise with infection occurring at tiny cracks in the fruit surface is evidence that this fruit is tender, which likely means high water content.

CREDITS: M. J. Mahovic

Figure 8. Arrested sour rot lesions. Sour rot lesions in green fruit may become arrested when exposed to air. The decay will resume development as the fruit ripens.

Preventing Losses to Postharvest Decay

CREDITS: S. R. Bartz

Figure 9. Fruit picked during a shower and then dye added to wet stem scar. The dye was washed off after 2 minutes and the fruit was sliced. Note the green dye moving down vascular tissues from the stem scar (top).

CREDITS: S. R. Bartz

Figure 10. Bacterial soft rot - internal lesion. Water - congested stem scar, such as was present in Figure 9, eliminated protection provided by a dry stem scar and enabled bacteria to enter fruit by capillary forces.

For More Information

The Growers IPM Guide for Florida Tomato and Pepper Production. http://ipm.ifas.ufl.edu/resources/success_stories/T&PGuide/index.shtm l

Identifying and Controlling Postharvest Tomato Diseases in Florida. EDIS publication HS866. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/HS131

Physiological, Nutritional and Other Disorders of Tomato Fruit. EDIS Publication HS-954. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/HS200


Footnotes

1. This document is HS363, one of a series of the Horticultural Sciences Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date July, 2007. Visit the EDIS Web Site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2. J. A. Bartz, Plant Pathology Department, University of Florida, S. A. Sargent, Horticultural Department, University of Florida, and P. R. Gilreath, Manatee County Extension Service, University of Florida.


The use of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information. UF/IFAS does not guarantee or warranty the products named, and references to them in this publication does not signify our approval to the exclusion of other products of suitable composition. All chemicals should be used in accordance with directions on the manufacturer's label. Use pesticides safely. Read and follow directions on the manufacturer's label.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Larry Arrington, Dean.



Copyright Information

This document is copyrighted by the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) for the people of the State of Florida. UF/IFAS retains all rights under all conventions, but permits free reproduction by all agents and offices of the Cooperative Extension Service and the people of the State of Florida. Permission is granted to others to use these materials in part or in full for educational purposes, provided that full credit is given to the UF/IFAS, citing the publication, its source, and date of publication.