• Topics: Entomology and Nematology  |  Cactus Pest Insects  | Moths  |  Featured Creatures collection  |  Family: Pyralidae (snout-moths)  |  Habeck, Dale H  | Bennett, F D 

Cactus Moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)¹

Introduction

The discovery of the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum Berg, in the Florida Keys in October, 1989 raised to at least five the number of phycitine moth species associated with prickly pear cacti (Opuntia spp.) in Florida. The presence of both Cactoblastis cactorum Berg and Ozamia lucidalis (Walker) in the Keys were new U.S. records. There is further evidence that another unreported species may be attacking Opuntia spp. in the Florida Keys. Additional collections and rearings are needed to confirm this.

Distribution

A native of South America, C. cactorium was introduced from Argentina to Australia in 1925 to control several species of North and South American Opuntia. Later, it was introduced into Hawaii, India, South Africa, and a few Caribbean islands for this same purpose.

In the Caribbean, the cactus moth was known only from the Lesser Antille, Bahama, Cuba, Jamaica and the Dominican Republic (Heinrich 1956, Bennett et al. 1985, Starmer et al. 1987). In early 2009, it was found in Mujeres, Mexico, about 10 miles offshore from Cancun (LSU 2009).

The moth's range continues to expand along both the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf coasts. It is now found as far north as Charleston, South Carolina and as far west as Louisiana (LSU 2009).

Although larvae were intercepted on infested nursery stock at a Wal-Mart Store in Pensacola, Florida, in July 2000, the discoveries in the St. Mark's area appear to be due to natural spread. There continues to be almost no confirmed records of inland movement. A report of the moth in Loxahatchee, Palm County, FL in June 1992 by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 24 km inland from the Atlantic Ocean, is the most inland record of which we are aware.

For more information you can access the proceedings of a workshop on Cactoblastis cactorum in North America at: http://www.fcla.edu/FlaEnt/fe844.htm.

Please Help! We would very much like to hear from you if you know of infestations in your area or if you know of the location of Opuntia cactus stands that we could check, particularly if the sites are inland or in front of the leading edge. Please contact: Dr. Stephen Hight, Tel.: 850-412-7262; Fax: 850-412-7263; hight@nettally.com.

Description

The wing span of the adults ranges from 22 to 35 mm. The forewings are grayish-brown, but whiter toward the costal margin. Distinct black antemedial and subterminal lines present. Hindwings white with some gray terminally. Phycitine adults are often very similar and are not easily identified since scales of specimens are usually rubbed off; however, genitalia can provide positive identification (Heinrich 1956). The larvae of C. cactorum are bright orangish-red with large dark spots forming transverse bands. Mature larvae are 25 to 30 mm long.

Figure 1. 

Adult cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg).

Figure 2. 

Larva of cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg).

Key to Florida Phycitine Larvae Associated with Opuntia spp.

1. Larvae gregarious, reddish or bluish-purple, feeding in cladodes (pads). . . . . 2

1'. Larvae solitary, not reddish or bluish-purple, feeding in or on cladodes. . . . . 3

2. Larvae orangish-red with conspicuous dark spots forming transverse bands. . . . .Cactioblastis cactorum (Berg)

2'. Larvae dirty-white to bluish-purple with smaller dark spots not forming transverse bands. . . . . Melitara prodenialis (Walker)

3. Larvae dirty-white, without spots. . . . . Rumatha glaucatella (Hulst)

3'. Larvae dark. . . . . 4

4. Larvae feeding singly in buds or fruit only. . . . . Ozamia lucidalis (Walker)

4'. Larvae feeding singly on dead tissue but most often feeding on coccids. . . . . Laetilia coccidivora (J.H. Comstock)

Biology

The female lays its eggs in the form of a chain, the first egg is attached to the end of a spine or spicule and succeeding eggs (140 or more, ave. = 75) stacked coin-like to form an egg-stick. On eclosion, the larvae crawl from the egg-stick onto the cladode or pad and burrow into it, usually within a few centimeters of the oviposition site. The larvae feed gregariously moving from cladode to cladode as the food supply is exhausted. During feeding the frass is pushed out of the pad and forms a noticeable heap on the ground. Fully developed larvae usually leave the plant and spin white cocoons in the leaf litter, in crevices in the bark of nearby trees, or in similar protected niches. Pupation occasionally occurs in the cladode. The moth emerges and the cycle is repeated. The length of the life cycle in Florida is unknown but probably shorter than in Queensland, Australia, where there are two generations per year (Dodd 1940).

Figure 3. 

Egg stick of the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg), on cactus pad.

Figure 4. 

Cactus pad dissected to show larvae of cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg), feeding within.

Economic Importance

C. cactorum, native to South America, was introduced from Argentina into Australia in 1925 to control several North American and South American species of Opuntia. In Queensland, 16 million acres of severely infested land were reclaimed for agriculture by the action of this insect. It has also been an effective control agent of Opuntia spp. in other areas including Hawaii, India, and South Africa. In 1957 it was introduced into the Caribbean, in Nevis, where the control of Opuntia curassavica and other Opuntia spp. was rapid and spectacular (Simmonds and Bennett 1966). Eggs and larvae, or infested cladodes, were sent from Nevis to Montserrat and Antigua in 1962 and to Grand Cayman in 1970 (Bennett et al. 1985). By 1963 it had naturally spread from the Lesser Antilles to Puerto Rico (Garcia-Tuduri et al. 1971) and is now present in Haiti, Dominican Republic, and the Bahamas (Starmer et al. 1987).

The arrival of Cactoblastis cactorum in Florida was viewed with concern because of its potential for adverse impact on native Opuntia spp. In the Florida Keys, O. spinosissima (Martyn) Mill., and O. tricantha (Willdenow) Sweet are rare and are on the "threatened" list. Other native species, such as Opuntia cubensis Britton & Rose, O. stricta Haw., O. humifusa (Raf.) Rafinesque, as well as exotic species, either naturalized or grown as ornamentals, in Florida are also at risk. Another concern is the probability that C. cactorum will spread west as far as Texas and into Mexico where the fruit and young vegetative parts of Opuntia spp. form part of the staple diet of humans and where chopped plants serve as cattle fodder in times of drought. In South Africa, C. cactorum significantly reduced growth of spineless Opuntia spp. valued as cattle food (Annecke et al. 1976).

Management

No satisfactory method of chemical control of C. cactorum is known. The widespread use of pesticides is not recommended because of the occurrence of rare and endangered fauna such as Schaus swallowtail http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures/bfly/schaus_swallowtail.htm, Florida leaf-wing and Bartram's hairstreak butterflies. Similarly, inundative releases of egg parasites such as Trichogramma could have an adverse impact on other desirable Lepidoptera.

Preliminary investigations indicate an appreciable level of predation of the pupae and the occurrence of a pupal parasite, Brachymeria sp., but these are unlikely to control C. cactorum.

Classical biological control should be considered. In its native habitat in South America several natural enemies are known including Apanteles alexanderi Brethes (Braconidae), Phyticiplex doddi (Cushman) and P. eremnus (Porter) (Ichneumonidae), Brachymeria cactoblastidis Blanchard (Chalcididae), and Epicoronimyia mundelli (Blanchard) (Tachinidae). The host range of these natural enemies would have to be determined before the release of any of these for the control of C. cactorum could be approved.

Selected References

• Annecke DP, Burger WA, Coetzee H. 1976. Pest status of Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) and Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Coccoidea: Dactylopiidae) in spineless Opuntia plantations in South Africa. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 39: 111-116.

• Bennett FD, Cock MJW, Hughes IW, Simmonds FJS, Yaseen M. [Cock MJW. (ed.)]. 1985. A review of biological control of pests in the Commonwealth Caribbean and Bermuda up to 1982. Commonwealth Institute Biological Control Technical Committee 9. 218 pp.

• Brown RL, Lee S, MacGown JA. (July 2009). Video of the dissection of the male genitalia of the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum. Cactus Moths and Their Relatives (Pyralidae: Phycitinae). http://mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/Researchtaxapages/CactusMoths/Cactoblastis_cactorum/VideoMaleGenitaliaDissection.html (20 July 2009).

• Dodd AP. 1940. The biological campaign against prickly-pear. Commonwealth Prickly-pear Board Bulletin, Brisbane, 177 pp.

• Durham S. (September 2006). Protecting the Prickly Pear Cactus in Its Native Habitat. USDA News & Events. http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2006/060901.htm (20 July 2009).

• Heinrich C. 1956. American moths of the subfamily Phycitinae. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 207. 581 pp.

• Garcia-Tuduri, Martorell JC, Medina Gaud S. 1971. Geographical distribution and host plant list of the cactus moth Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) in Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands. Journal of the Agricultural University of Puerto Rico 55: 130-134.

• LSU. (July 2009). Cactus Moth. LSU AgCenter Pest Alerts. http://www.lsuagcenter.com/en/environment/insects/Pest+Alerts/Cactus+Moth.htm (24 July 2009).

• Simmonds FJ, Bennett FD. 1966. Biological control of Opuntia spp. by Cactoblastis cactorum in the Leeward Islands (West Indies). Entomophaga 11: 183-189.

• Starmer, W.T., V. Aberdeen, and M.A. Lachance. 1987. The yeast community associated with decaying Opuntia stricta (Haworth) in Florida with regard to the moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg). Fla. Sci. 51:7-11.

• Wildman, A. (January 2008). International cooperative effort to slow the spread of cactus moth. Plant Medicine Program. http://www.dpm.ifas.ufl.edu/plant_pest_risk_assessment/documents/DPM%20Presentation%20Cactoblastis_01-09-08.pdf (21 July 2009).

The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Millie Ferrer-Chancy, Interim Dean.

• Copyright 2009 |
• Site Feedback |
• About This Site