Causes and Management of Insect and Mite Resistance in Strawberry Production
Click here to view a PDF version of this document.
Home Search What's New Products Survey Help
Causes and Management of Insect and Mite Resistance in Strawberry Production

   

Causes and Management of Insect and Mite Resistance in Strawberry Production1

James F. Price, Elzie McCord, Jr., and Curtis Nagle2

Resistance of arthropods to crop management chemicals has been problematic since the early era of synthetic organic pesticides. During the late 1990s, the twospotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) became resistant to abamectin, the miticide used in strawberry culture. Since then, several new miticides including acequinocyl, bifenazate, etoxazole, hexythiazox, and spiromesifen have been integrated into strawberry production, overuse of the abamectin has ceased, and it once again is effective in rotation with the new materials. This latter development could prove temporary, especially if growers again use abamectin regularly.

Poor performance of pesticides does not always indicate pest resistance. Such factors as pesticide degradation in storage, hydrolysis in acid or alkaline preparations, applications to an incorrect life stage, or other inadequate application procedures may contribute to poor control.

A Definition of Resistance

Pest populations can be susceptible or resistant to a pesticide. Resistance occurs when a formerly susceptible pest population becomes significantly less susceptible to a pesticide and degradation of the pesticide or improper application is not a factor. Pesticide resistance is a population-based phenomenon in which the genetic composition shifts and the population becomes dominated by individuals possessing genes that confer resistance.

Establishment of Resistance

Resistant populations are protected from formerly effective pesticides through one or more means. For example, resistant pests may: (1) deactivate (break down), (2) sequester (safely store within their bodies), (3) avoid, or (4) excrete the toxin from their bodies more effectively, (5) have an altered target site that will not accumulate the toxin, or (6) reduce the permeability by the toxin through their exoskeletons ("shells").

Individuals within a susceptible pest population often vary in their level of susceptibility; however, the non-susceptible type occurs only very rarely. When a pesticide is applied repeatedly, the susceptible pests die and the resistant ones survive, mate with other survivors and reproduce. Some of their offspring inherit the parents' characteristic for survival. Upon additional applications, the susceptible offspring within the remaining population die and the resistant ones survive, mate with other survivors and produce more offspring. Further applications additionally select for the resistant individuals until that form (genotype) is common. The population then is regarded as resistant and the effectiveness of the pesticide is lost.

Resistance Management

Resistance can develop rapidly with pests that have many generations per year, when multiple generations are exposed to a pesticide, and when new individuals do not move into a treated area to dilute the frequency of the resistant genes. Some of these factors occurred on strawberry farms in the 1990s, contributing to development of abamectin resistance in spider mites.

The main objectives of on-farm resistance management programs should be to minimize the number of exposures of pests to pesticides with a similar mode of action and to use non-chemical approaches to arthropod management. (Mode of action is the specific activity of the toxin that results in the death of the pest. For instance, one mode of action is to inhibit mitochondrial complex I electron transport. This causes a failure of the pest to produce energy in affected cells and to die.)

Repeated exposures to a pesticide are the primary drivers of resistance but much can be done to manage pests by means other than chemicals. Care can be taken to rotate strawberries with other crops, use pest resistant varieties, plant pest-free transplants, conserve and release natural enemies, etc. Pest-specific tactics are available for particular situations such as removal of all ripe strawberries from the field to eliminate reproductive sites for sap beetles.

Strawberry fields should be scouted weekly and pesticide applications made only when pest densities approach economic injury levels. When pesticide use is required, products should be rotated among the different modes of action indicated on many modern product labels. A list of modes of action can be found by selecting "MoA Classification Scheme" at the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee Website: http://www.irac-online.org/Crop_Protection/MoA. asp .

Tables 1-3 present insecticide and miticide modes of action summaries for Florida strawberry production. Sound rotation plans often recommend pesticides of one mode of action for one pest generation and a pesticide of a different mode of action for another generation. If multiple pesticide applications are required, rotations should continue through all practical modes of action before returning to a previously used one. The use of certain unique products with known general modes of action (such as soaps and oils) is unlikely to result in pest resistance and no codes are assigned. These can be used without regard to a rotation plan for resistance management.

When pesticides are used, it is important to assure that fresh, fully potent pesticides are prepared and applied in accordance with label directions. Aqueous pesticidal preparations should be adjusted to near neutral pH (pH 7.0) or as specified by the label. Sprayer calibration, nozzle condition and pressure, and spray placement must be correct. Applications also should be timed and directed to contact the most susceptible life stage of the pest.

Conclusion

Episodes of pest resistance to popular pesticides can cause yield losses, reduction of fruit quality, added control costs, environmental degradation, and emotional stress among farmers. These consequences can be alleviated if resistance management is practiced throughout the strawberry industry. If growers minimize pesticide application by depending more on biological and cultural pest control measures, and reduce pest exposure to pesticides with identical modes of action, then resistance can become a rare phenomenon.

Tables

Table 1. Mode of action of insecticides and miticides registered for use in Florida's strawberry crops (presented by active ingredient). (Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) mode of action classification codes version 5.3).

Active Ingredient (common name)

Trade Name Examples

Mode of Action Code

abamectin


Agri-Mek

Abacus


6

acequinocyl
Kanemite


20B

azadirachtin
Aza-Direct

Azatrol


18B

Bacillus thuringiensis aizawai


Agree

Xentari


11B1

Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki


Dipel

Javelin


11B2

Beauveria bassiana


Botanigard

Naturalis



bifenazate
Acramite


25

bifenthrin
Brigade


3

carbaryl
Sevin

1A

chlorpyrifos
Govern

Lorsban


1B

diazinon


Diazinon

1B

endosulfan
Thiodan

Thionex


2A

etoxazole
Zeal


10B

fenbutatin-oxide


Vendex


12B

fenpropathrin
Danitol


3

hexythiazox
Savey

10A

imidacloprid
Admire

Provado


4A

malathion
Malathion

1B

methoxyfenozide


Intrepid


18A

naled
Dibrom

1B

potassium salts of fatty acids
AllPro Insecticidal Soap

M-Pede



propargite
Omite


12C

piperonyl butoxide


Pyrenone

Pyreth-It


27A

pyrethrin


Pyrenone

Pyreth-It

PyGanic

Pyrellin


3

pyriproxyfen
Esteem


7D

rotenone
Pyrellin


21

s-methoprene
Extinguish

7A

spinosad
Entrust

Justice

Spintor


5

spiromesifen
Oberon


23

thiamethoxam


Actara

Platinum


4A

Table 2. Mode of action of insecticides and miticides registered for use in Florida's strawberry crops (presented by mode of action code). (Insecticide Resistance Action Committee mode of action classification code version 5.3).

Mode of Action Code

Active Ingredient (common name)

Trade Name Examples


Beauveria bassiana


Botanigard

Naturalis


potassium salts of fatty acids
AllPro Insecticidal Soap

M-Pede


1A

carbaryl
Sevin

1B

chlorpyrifos
Govern

Lorsban


diazinon
Diazinon
malathion
Malathion
naled
Dibrom

2A

endosulfan
Thiodan

Thionex


3

bifenthrin
Brigade


fenpropathrin
Danitol


pyrethrin
Pyrenone

PyGanic

Pyrellin

Pyreth-It


4A

imidacloprid
Admire

Provado


thiamethoxam
Actara

Platinum


5

spinosad
Entrust

Justice

Spintor


6

abamectin
Abacus

Agri-Mek


7A

s-methoprene
Extinguish

7D

pyriproxyfen
Esteem


10A

hexythiazox
Savey


10B

etoxazole
Zeal


11B1

Bacillus thuringiensis aizawai


Agree

Xentari


11B2

Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki


Dipel

Javelin


12B

fenbutatin-oxide


Vendex


12C

propargite
Omite


18A

methoxyfenozide


Intrepid


18B

azadirachtin
Aza-Direct

Azatrol


20B

acequinocyl
Kanemite


21

rotenone
Pyrellin


23

spriomesifen
Oberon


25

bifenazate
Acramite


27A

piperonyl butoxide
Pyrenone

Pyreth-It


Table 3. Mode of action of insecticides and miticides registered for use in Florida's strawberry crops (presented by trade name). (Insecticide Resistance Action Committee mode of action classification codes version 5.3).

Trade Name Examples

Active Ingredient (common name)

Mode of Action Code

Abacus


abamectin


6

Acramite


bifenazate


25

Actara


thiamethoxam


4A

Admire


imidacloprid


4A

Agree


Bacillus thuringiensis aizawai


11B1

Agri-Mek


abamectin


6

AllPro Insecticidal Soap
potassium salts of fatty acids

Aza-Direct
azadirachtin

18B

Azatrol


azadirachtin


18B

Botanigard
Beauveria bassiana



Brigade


bifenthrin


3

Danitol


fenpropathrin


3

Dipel
Bacillus thuringiensis Kurstaki


11B2

Diazinon
diazinon

1B

Dibrom
naled

1B

Entrust
spinosad


5

Esteem


pyriproxyfen


7D

Extinguish
s-methoprene

7A

Govern


chlorpyrifos


1B

Intrepid


methoxyfenozide


18

Javelin
Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki


11B2

Justice


spinosad

5

Kanemite


acequinocyl


20B

Lorsban


chlorpyrifos


1B

M-Pede
potassium salts of fatty acids

Malathion
malathion

1B

Naturalis
Beauveria bassiana



Oberon


spiromesifen


23

Omite
propargite

12C

Platinum


thiamethoxam


4A

Provado


imidacloprid


4A

PyGanic
pyrethrin

3

Pyrellin
pyrethrin & rotenone

3 & 21

Pyrenone
pyrethrin & piperonyl butoxide

3 & 27A

Pyreth-It
pyrethrin & piperonyl butoxide

3 & 27A

Savey


hexythiazox


10A

Sevin


carbaryl

1A

Spintor
spinosad

5

Thiodan


endosulfan


2A

Thionex


endosulfan


2A

Vendex


fentutatin-oxide


12B

Xentari


Bacillus thuringiensis aizawai


11B1

Zeal


extoxazole


10B


Footnotes

1. This document is ENY-841 (IN713), a publication of the Department of Entomology and Nematology, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, IFAS, University of Florida. Publication date: November 2007. Please visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2. James F. Price, associate professor, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center; Elzie McCord, Jr., associate professor, Dept. of Biological Sciences, New College of Florida; and Curtis Nagle, biological scientist, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center. Cooperative Extension Service, IFAS, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Larry Arrington, Dean.



Copyright Information

This document is copyrighted by the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) for the people of the State of Florida. UF/IFAS retains all rights under all conventions, but permits free reproduction by all agents and offices of the Cooperative Extension Service and the people of the State of Florida. Permission is granted to others to use these materials in part or in full for educational purposes, provided that full credit is given to the UF/IFAS, citing the publication, its source, and date of publication.