
This guide explains the rationale behind the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee's (IRAC) insecticide and acaricide mode-of-action classification and provides a listing of those insecticide common names with their groupings and primary modes of action for insecticides currently registered in Florida.
IRAC has groups in several countries, including the United States, Brazil, South Africa, Spain, India, and Australia. An IRAC group's purpose is to provide agricultural producers and crop-protection professionals with information on resistance management. Members of an IRAC group are generally professionals who are actively engaged in the insecticide and acaricide manufacturing industry. Some university researchers also participate.
Resistance refers to an inheritable change in the sensitivity of a pest population that is reflected in the repeated failure of a product to achieve the expected level of control when used according to the label recommendation for that pest species. Resistance does not always occur, but has been documented with insecticides as early as 1914, and there are many known instances today where resistance is a problem.
Resistance has not only occurred with insecticides, but also with other pesticides, such as fungicides, herbicides, and rodenticides. Complicating the understanding and management of resistance is the problem of knowing which type of resistance is present in a given pest population. For example, some pest populations are known to have cross-resistance. That is, they are not effectively controlled with pesticides having the same mode of action which generally target the same site within the pest. For example, both the carbamate and organophosphate insecticides target acetylcholine esterase although each group of insecticides is chemically different from one another. The greatest resistance concern arises when multiple-resistance is confirmed. Multiple-resistance is the situation of a pest population that is resistant to pesticides having different modes of action. Multiple-resistance is the most difficult type of resistance to manage because the number of management options is reduced. For more information on resistance, see EDIS Publication ENY-624,2005 Florida Citrus Pest Management Guide: Pesticide Resistance and Resistance Management, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/cg026.
IRAC's insecticide-classification scheme is based on mode of action. The goal of the scheme is to provide information to applicators of acaricides and insecticides so that they can make sound decisions on selecting insecticides to prevent or manage resistance. Besides selecting products that have different modes of action, growers are also encouraged to integrate other methods into programs for insect and mite control. Table 1 contains those acaricides and insecticides registered for use in Florida in 2008. Keep in mind, however, these registrations change constantly. The registered acaricides and insecticides are listed according to IRAC's classification scheme by their group and subgroup codes, primary target site of action, chemical sub-group or exemplifying active ingredient, and active ingredient, based on that appearing in The Pesticide Manual, 14th edition, 2006, edited by C.D.S. Tomlin, published by The British Crop Protection Council.
IRAC is encouraging manufacturers of pesticides to indicate the IRAC mode-of-action group number and description on their product labels, and some registrants are doing so, especially with newer products. Such information would be helpful in assisting pesticide applicators in the selection of acaricides and insecticides for use in resistance-management strategies. One example the manner which IRAC suggests registrants list this information follows below.
McCoy, C.W., M.E. Rogers, and L.W. Timmer. 2004. 2005 Florida citrus pest management guide: pesticide resistance and resistance management, EDIS Publication ENY-624, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/CG026. Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Tomlin, C.D.S., ed. 2003. The pesticide manual: a world compendium, 13th edition. The British Crop Protection Council. 1250 pp., ISBN 1 901396 13 4.
IRAC's classification scheme for acaricides and insecticides registered for use in Florida.
Group |
Subgroup |
Primary target site of action |
Chemical subgroup or exemplifying active ingredient |
Active ingredients |
1* |
1A |
Acetylcholine esterase inhibitors |
Carbamates |
Aldicarb |
Bendiocarb |
||||
Carbaryl |
||||
Carbofuran |
||||
Methiocarb |
||||
Methomyl |
||||
Oxamyl |
||||
Propoxur |
||||
Thiodicarb |
||||
1B |
Organophosphates |
Acephate |
||
Azinphos-methyl |
||||
Chlorpyrifos |
||||
Chlorpyrifos-methyl |
||||
Coumaphos |
||||
Diazinon |
||||
Dichlorvos |
||||
Dicrotophos |
||||
Dimethoate |
||||
Disulfoton |
||||
Ethion |
||||
Ethoprop |
||||
Fenamiphos |
||||
Fenthion |
||||
Fosthiazate |
||||
Isofenphos |
||||
Malathion |
||||
Methamidophos |
||||
Methidathion |
||||
Methyl parathion |
||||
Naled |
||||
Oxydemeton-methyl |
||||
Phorate |
||||
Profenofos |
||||
Propetamphos |
||||
Temephos |
||||
Terbufos |
||||
Tetrachlorvinphos |
||||
Trichlorfon |
||||
2* |
2A |
GABA-gated chloride channel antagonists |
Cyclodiene organochlorines |
Endosulfan |
Lindane |
||||
2B |
Phenylpryazoles (Fiproles) |
Fipronil |
||
3 |
3A |
Sodium channel modulators |
Pyrethrins |
Allethrin and isomers |
Bifenthrin and isomers |
||||
Cyfluthrin and isomers |
||||
Cyhalothrin and isomers |
||||
Cypermethrin and isomers |
||||
Cyphenothrin isomers |
||||
Deltamethrin |
||||
Esfenvalerate |
||||
Fenpropathrin |
||||
Fenvalerate |
||||
Imiprothrin |
||||
Permethrin |
||||
Phenothrin isomers |
||||
Prallethrin |
||||
Pyrethrins |
||||
Resmethrin |
||||
Tefluthrin |
||||
Tetramethrin |
||||
Tralomethrin |
||||
3B |
Methoxychlor |
Methoxychlor |
||
4* |
4A |
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists |
Neonicotinoids |
Acetamiprid |
Clothianidin |
||||
Imidacloprid |
||||
Thiamethoxam |
||||
4B |
Nicotine |
Nicotine |
||
5 |
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor allosteric activators |
Spinosyns |
Spinetoram |
|
Spinosad |
||||
6 |
Chloride channel activators |
Avermectins |
Abamectin |
|
Milbemycins |
Milbebectin |
|||
7* |
7A |
Juvenile hormone mimics |
Juvenile hormone analogues |
Hydroprene |
Kinoprene |
||||
7B |
Fenoxycarb |
Fenoxycarb |
||
8* |
8A |
Miscellaneous non-specific (multi-site) inhibitors |
Methyl bromide |
Methyl bromide and other alkyl halides |
8B |
Chloropicrin |
Chloropicrin |
||
8C |
Sulfuryl fluoride |
Sulfuryl fluoride |
||
8D |
Borax |
Borax |
||
10* |
10A |
Mite growth inhibitors |
Clofentezine |
Clofentezine |
Hexythiazox |
Hexythiazox |
|||
10B |
Etoxazole |
Etoxazole |
||
11 |
Microbial disruptors of insect midgut membranes (includes transgenic crops expressing B.t. toxins) |
Bacillus thuringiensis or Bacillus sphaericus |
Bacillus thuringiensis |
|
Bacillus sphaericus |
||||
12 |
12B |
Inhibitors of mitochondrial ATP synthase |
Organotin miticides |
Fentutatin oxide |
12C |
Propargite |
Propargite |
||
15 |
Inhibitors of chitin biosynthesis, type 0, Leptdopteran |
Benzoylureas |
Diflubenzuron | |
Hexaflumuron |
||||
Novaluron |
||||
Noviflumuron |
||||
17 |
Moulting disruptor, Dipteran |
Cyromazine |
Cyromazine |
|
18 |
Ecdysone receptor agonists |
Diacylhydrazines |
Halofenozide |
|
Methoxyfenozide |
||||
Tebufenozide |
||||
19 |
Octopamine agonists |
Amitraz |
Amitraz |
|
20* |
20A |
Mitochondrial complex III electron transport inhibitors (Coupling site II) |
Hydramethylnon |
Hydramethylnon |
21* |
21B |
Mitochondrial complex I electron transport inhibitors |
Rotenone |
Rotenone |
22* |
22A |
Voltage-dependent sodium channel blockers |
Indoxacarb |
Indoxacarb |
23 |
Inhibitors of acetyl CoA carboxylase |
Tetronic and tetramic acid derivatives |
Spirotetramat |
|
24* |
24A |
Mitochondrial complex IV electron transport inhibitors |
Phosphine |
Aluminum phosphide |
Phosphine |
||||
Zinc phosphide |
||||
UN |
Compounds of unknown or uncertain mode of action@ |
Azadirachtin |
Azadirachtin |
|
Bifenazate |
Bifenazate |
|||
Cryolite |
Cryolite |
|||
Dicofol |
Dicofol |
|||
* Groups and sub-groups: although sharing the same primary target site, it is possible that not all members of a single mode of action class have been shown to be cross-resistant. Different resistance mechanisms that are not linked to the target site, such as enhanced metabolism, may be common for such a group of chemicals. In such cases, the mode-of-action grouping is further divided into sub-groups. @ A compound with an unknown or controversial mode of action or an unknown mode of toxicity will be held in category UN until evidence becomes available to enable that compound to be assigned to a more appropriate mode-of-action class. |
||||
This document is PI-83, one of a series of the Pesticide Information Office, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date, October 2005. Revised December 2008. Visit the EDIS Web site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
Frederick M. Fishel, associate professor, Agronomy Department, and director, Pesticide Information Office; Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal
Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational
information and other services only to individuals and institutions
that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed,
color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital
status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations.
For more information on obtaining other extension publications,
contact your county Cooperative Extension service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service,
University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative
Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Millie Ferrer-Chancy,
Interim Dean.