Pesticide Use Trends in the U. S. : Pesticides for Home and Garden Uses Pesticide Use Trends in the U. S. : Pesticides for Home and Garden Uses
Pesticide Use Trends in the U. S. : Pesticides for Home and Garden Uses1
Frederick M. Fishel2
Introduction
The EPA, in cooperation with the USDA and FDA, is responsible for regulating the production and use of pesticides in the U.S. This document is one of a series that provides data on volumes used and sales of pesticides from the latest EPA survey data available, 2001 - 2002. This document focuses on the market sector for pesticides used for the home and garden. Other documents within this series address the agricultural and industrial/commercial/governmental sectors. The intent of this information is only to present an objective profile and does not attempt to interpret, reach conclusions about, or make inferences regarding the data. Conclusions should not be drawn in regards to impacts on human health, the environment, or the economy.Data sources
The data reported in this document are based upon EPA estimates. EPA does not have a program devoted specifically to estimating pesticide use; rather, they use the best available information from the public domain and proprietary sources. The data are approximate values and not statistically precise. The sources that EPA consults for compiling this information include:
- The Pesticide Data Center in the Biological and Economic Analysis Division of EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs;
- Several national database services for compiling agricultural pesticide use data, including the USDA; and
- Proprietary data sources with vendor permission, including Doane Marketing Research, Inc., Kline and Company, Inc., SRI, Inc., Wood Mackenzie; and Mike Bukley, Inc.
Explanation of data components
The home and garden use category includes pesticides applied to homes, lawns, and gardens by homeowners and tenants occupying those spaces. The expenditure data presented in Table 1 separate broad classes of pesticides - herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and other pesticides. The "herbicide" data combine plant growth regulators (PGR) with them, while "fungicides" and "insecticides" exclude sulfur and petroleum oil. Data summarized for "other" pesticides combine the total for rodenticides, molluscicides, nematicides, fumigants, aquatic, pesticides for the control of birds and fish, and other miscellaneous pesticides. Sulfur and petroleum oil are included in the "other" category as well. The use data shown in Table 2 are presented similarly, except that nematicides and fumigants are presented as a separate category. The EPA survey use data exclude industrial wood preservatives, sulfur, petroleum oil, specialty biocides, chlorine/hypochlorites, and other chemicals used as pesticides. In reporting the amount used, data are presented as pounds of active ingredient (a.i.). Totals may not add precisely due to rounding.U.S. home and garden pesticide expenditures
Total expenditures for home and garden pesticide use as a whole were slightly higher in 2001 compared to 2000 (Table 1 ). U.S. home and garden pesticide expenditures totaled an average of slightly more than $2 billion in both 2000 and 2001. Expenditures on insecticides/miticides accounted for the largest portion of total expenditures - approximately 60% for both years, followed by expenditures on herbicides/plant growth regulators, other pesticides, and fungicides. There was relatively no change in percentage quantities of pesticide expenditures for each class of pesticide between years.U.S. home and garden pesticide amount used
U.S. home and garden total pesticide amount used in 2000 and 2001 ranged from 90 to 102 million pounds, depending upon year (Table 2 ). The largest portion of total U.S. home and garden pesticides used each year was with herbicides at approximately 70%, followed by insecticides and miticides, fungicides, and other pesticides.Most commonly used conventional home and garden pesticide active ingredients
Table 3 shows the ten most commonly used conventional home and garden pesticide active ingredients in 2001 compared with 1999. 2,4-D was the most used active ingredient during both years, between 7 million and 11 million pounds. Glyphosate was the second most commonly used active ingredient, consistent for both years. Of the top ten active ingredients, seven were herbicides and three were insecticides. Due to the fact that some commercial applicators apply pesticides in the home and garden sector, there may be some usage that was reported in the industrial/commercial/governmental market sector.Additional information
- Kiely, T., D. Donaldson, and A. Grube. 2004. Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 2000 and 2001 Market Estimates. EPA's Biological and Economic Analysis Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, and Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances http://www.epa.gov/pesticides .
Tables
Table 1. U.S. home and garden pesticide expenditures by pesticide class - 2000 and 2001.
Class
Millions $
% of Total
2000
Herbicides/PGR
596
29
Insecticides/Miticides
1,250
60
Fungicides
41
2
Other
181
9
Total
2,068
2001
Herbicides
631
29
Insecticides/Miticides
1,288
60
Fungicides
48
2
Other
184
9
Total
2,151
Table 2. U.S. home and garden pesticide amount used by pesticide class - 2000 and 2001.
Class
Millions Pounds a.i.
% of Total
2000
Herbicides/PGR
62
69
Insecticides/Miticides
15
17
Fungicides
11
12
Nematicides/Fumigants
1
1
Other
1
1
Total
90
2001
Herbicides
71
70
Insecticides/Miticides
17
17
Fungicides
12
12
Nematicides/Fumigants
1
1
Other
1
1
Total
102
Table 3. Ten most commonly used conventional home and garden pesticide active ingredients (millions pounds active ingredient).
Active Ingredient
Type*
2001
1999
Rank
Range**
Rank
Range
2,4-D
H
1
8-11
1
7-9
Glyphosate
H
2
5-8
2
5-8
Pendimethalin
H
3
3-6
NA
NA
Diazinon
I
4
4-6
5
2-4
MCPP
H
5
4-6
3
3-5
Carbaryl
I
6
2-4
7
2-4
Dicamba
H
7
2-4
4
3-5
Malathion
I
8
2-4
9
1-3
DCPA
H
9
1-3
10
1-3
Benefin
H
10
1-3
8
1-3
*H = herbicide; I = insecticide. **Range is the estimate taken from several data sources.
Footnotes
1. This document is PI-140, one of a series of the Pesticide Information Office, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Published January 2007. Visit the EDIS Web Site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.2. Frederick M. Fishel, associate professor, Agronomy Department, and director, Pesticide Information Office; Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
The use of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information. UF/IFAS does not guarantee or warranty the products named, and references to them in this publication does not signify our approval to the exclusion of other products of suitable composition. Use pesticides safely. Read and follow directions on the manufacturer's label.
The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Larry Arrington, Dean.
Copyright Information
This document is copyrighted by the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) for the people of the State of Florida. UF/IFAS retains all rights under all conventions, but permits free reproduction by all agents and offices of the Cooperative Extension Service and the people of the State of Florida. Permission is granted to others to use these materials in part or in full for educational purposes, provided that full credit is given to the UF/IFAS, citing the publication, its source, and date of publication.