Nassau County: Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides
Click here to view a PDF version of this document.
Home Search What's New Products Survey Help
Nassau County: Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides

   

Nassau County: Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides1

G.W. Hurt and T.A. Obreza2

RATINGS FOR NASSAU COUNTY SOILS FOR PESTICIDE SELECTION

Resource soil scientists with the U. S. Natural Resources Conservation Service have rated the soils that are delineated by map units in the Interim Nassau County Soil Survey Report1 for their potential for leaching and runoff of pesticides. The rating criteria are given in a companion publication entitled "Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides for Water Quality Goals." These soil ratings have been developed to help pesticide users determine the potential for pesticides to be lost to groundwater or surface water bodies.

As explained in Circular 9592, factors that determine pesticide leaching ratings in soil are permeability and the occurrence of mucky layers in the upper 80 inches of the soil. Soils rated High have a high potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater, soils rated Medium have a medium potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater, and soils rated Low have a low potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater. Factors that determine pesticide runoff ratings from soils are hydrologic group, permeability, and slope. Soils rated High have a high potential for pesticide runoff, soils rated Medium have a medium potential for pesticide runoff, and soils rated Low have a low potential for pesticide runoff.

NOTE: The user may discover that one or more map unit names in Table 1 have been updated from names given in the legend of the soil survey report1. For example, a soil map unit may be listed in the survey report with a single soil series name, whereas the same soil map unit is shown as comprising two or more soil series in Table 1 (sequence numbers 1, 2, 3, ..) Where this occurs, the user should use the multi-named map unit given here, and make pesticide selections based on the most limiting condition to be found on the land in question. If necessary, the local Natural Resources Conservation Service office should be contacted to perform an on-site evaluation of the land in question.

REFERENCES

  1. Moore, A.L., O.D. Owens, and F.C. Watts. 1988. Interim Soil Survey Report, Maps and Interpretations, Nassau County, Florida. USDA/NRCS in cooperation with Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Board of County Commissioners of Nassau County, Florida.

  2. Obreza, T.A. and G. W. Hurt. 2006. Soil Ratings For Selecting Pesticides For Water Quality Goals. Circular 959, Soil and Water Science Department, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611. 5pp.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The development of this document was supported by the USDA/ES Water Quality Initiative Project # 89EWQI-1-9134.

Tables

Table 1. Soil Ratings for Nassau County (see footnotes for explanations of column headings).

MUID


SYS NUM


MUSYM


SOIL NAME


SOIL LEACH


SOIL RUNOFF


89002
1
2
ARENTS
High
Medium
89003
1
3
BEACHES
High
High
89004
1
4
ECHAW
High
Medium
89005
1
5
FRIPP
High
Low
89006
1
6
HURRICANE
High
Medium
89006
2
6
POTTSBURG
Medium
High
89007
1
7
KINGSLAND
Low
High
89008
1
8
KUREB
High
Low
89009
1
9
LEON
Medium
High
89010
1
10
MANDARIN
Medium
Medium
89011
1
11
CHAIRES
Low
High
89012
1
12
NEWHAN
High
Low
89012
2
12
COROLLA
High
Low
89013
1
13
GOLDHEAD
Low
High
89014
1
14
RUTLEGE
Medium
High
89015
1
15
BUCCANEER
Low
High
89016
1
16
ELLABELLE
Low
High
89017
1
17
URBAN
Low
High
89018
1
18
LYNN HAVEN
Medium
High
89018
2
18
WESCONNETT
Low
High
89018
3
18
LEON
Medium
High
89019
1
19
LEON
Medium
High
89020
1
20
ORTEGA
High
Low
89021
1
21
BLANTON
Medium
Low
89022
1
22
SAPELO
Low
High
89022
2
22
LEON
Medium
High
89023
1
23
OCILLA
Low
Medium
89024
1
24
KINGSFERRY
Low
High
89025
1
25
MAUREPAS
Low
High
89026
1
26
CENTENARY
High
Low
89027
1
27
RIDGEWOOD
High
Medium
89028
1
28
TISONIA
Low
High
89029
1
29
RESOTA
High
Low
89030
1
30
KUREB
High
Low
89030
2
30
RESOTA
High
Low
89031
1
31
KERSHAW
High
Low
89032
1
32
AQUALFS
Low
High
89033
1
33
GOLDHEAD
Low
High
89033
2
33
MEADOWBROOK
Medium
High
89034
1
34
CROATAN
Low
High
89036
1
36
BOULOGNE
Low
High
89037
1
37
MEGGETT
Low
High
89038
1
38
MEGGETT
Low
High
89039
1
39
EVERGREEN
Low
High
89039
2
39
LEON
Medium
High
89040
1
40
BROOKMAN
Low
High
89044
1
44
COROLLA
High
High
89045
1
45
MEGGETT
Low
High
89046
1
46
BUCCANEER
Low
High
89047
1
47
LEEFIELD
Low
Medium
89049
1
49
OUSLEY
High
High
89049
2
49
MANDARIN
Medium
Medium
89050
1
50
BLANTON
Medium
Medium
89051
1
51
ALBANY
Low
Medium
89052
1
52
OSIER
High
High
89053
1
53
MEADOWBROOK
Medium
High
89054
1
54
SAPELO
Low
High
89055
1
55
MEADOWBROOK
Medium
High
89055
2
55
GOLDHEAD
Low
High
89055
3
55
MEGGETT
Low
High
89056
1
56
BLANTON
Medium
Low
89056
2
56
ORTEGA
High
Low
89057
1
57
PENNEY
High
Low
089w
1
W
WATER
Footnotes:
MUID = Natural Resources Conservation Service's map unit identifier.
SEQ NUM = Sequence Number, indicating a particular soil name among one or more names constituting a map unit name.
MUSYM = Map Unit Symbol from the soil map and legend in the Interim Soil Survey Report of Nassau County, Florida. Note that if a MUSYM appears more than once in this list it signifies that two or more soils are co-dominant in that map unit, and each such soil is rated separately here.
SOIL NAME = Name of soil or other landscape component (urban land, beaches, water, etc.)
SOIL LEACH = The rating of the soil for leaching of pesticides through the soil profile.
SOIL RUNOFF = The rating of the soil for runoff of pesticides from the soil surface.


NOTE: See "Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides for Water Quality Goals" (IFAS Extension Circular 959) for explanations of the criteria used to develop soil ratings presented in the right-hand four columns of this list.


Footnotes

1. This document is SL89, a fact sheet of the Soil and Water Science Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Publication date: April 1991, revised September 2006. Please visit the EDIS Web site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2. G.W. Hurt, National Leader for Hydric Soils, Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA; T.A. Obreza, Professor, Soil and Water Science Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Larry Arrington, Dean.



Copyright Information

This document is copyrighted by the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) for the people of the State of Florida. UF/IFAS retains all rights under all conventions, but permits free reproduction by all agents and offices of the Cooperative Extension Service and the people of the State of Florida. Permission is granted to others to use these materials in part or in full for educational purposes, provided that full credit is given to the UF/IFAS, citing the publication, its source, and date of publication.