University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF
Publication #FS981

Field Evaluation of Container Nursery Irrigation Systems: Measuring Uniformity of Water Application of Microirrigation Systems1

Dorota Z. Haman and Thomas H. Yeager2

Performance of microirrigation systems can be evaluated by measuring operating pressures, application rates, and uniformity of water application under nursery conditions. In this article, we will present a simple test to determine the uniformity of water application.

There is an easy test to evaluate water application uniformity. Measurements of the time required to fill the same container must be performed at a minimum of 18 locations throughout the irrigation zone. The statistical uniformity nomograph (Bralts and Kesner, 1983) is based on statistical coefficient of variation and can be used to determine the overall application uniformity (Figure 1). If the uniformity is low, more than 18 measurements of time (seconds) may be necessary to increase the confidence level of the uniformity measurement. The uniformity test should be performed every six months.

To perform the test you need a small container, such as empty bottle, and a watch with a second hand so you can record the time to fill bottle at each location. The following steps are required.

Determine how many measurements represent one-sixth of the total locations in the zone. For example, if a total of 18 measurements is performed, this number is 3.

  1. Add the lowest three measurements of time (seconds) and mark the sum on the x-axis of the nomograph.

  2. Add the highest three measurements of time (seconds) and mark the sum on the y-axis of the nomograph.

  3. If the sums do not fit on the scale or if the value is very small so that it is difficult to read, the sums can be multiplied or divided by a common factor.

  4. Read the water application uniformity at the intersection of the two lines passing through these points.

Figure 1. 

Microirrigation Uniformity Nomograph


[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Example

Assume that water was collected randomly from 18 emitters throughout an irrigation zone. The time to fill the same bottle was recorded in Table 1.

  1. one-sixth of 18 data points = 3

  2. +105+110 = 317 seconds (lowest 3 values). Mark this value on horizontal (x) axis of the nomograph and draw a vertical line through this point.

  3. +145+150 = 425 seconds (highest 3 values). Mark this value on the vertical (y) axis of the nomograph and draw a horizontal line through this point.

  4. Read the uniformity of application. The point of intersection of these lines falls in the section of 80% to 90% that indicates "very good" uniformity of the system. The uniformity of water application by microirrigation emitters should be at least in the category "very good" (see Figure 1), especially if fertilizers are injected into the system.

Low uniformities in microirrigation systems can be due to factors, such as:

  • Improper pipe diameters (submains, manifolds, and laterals)

  • Too high or too low operation pressure

  • Emitters not appropriate for system design

  • Clogged emitters

  • Changes or wear on system components

  • Changes in pump output and pressure

Literature Cited

Bralts, V. F. and C. D. Kesner. 1983. Drip Irrigation Field Uniformity Estimation. Transactions of the Amer. Soc. Ag. Eng. 26(5):1369-1374.

Additional Reference

Haman, D. Z., A. G. Smajstrla and D. J. Pitts. 1997. Uniformity of Sprinkler and Microirrigation Systems for Nurseries. Bulletin 96-10:1-7, Fla. Coop. Ext. Ser. Univ. of Fla., Gainesville, Florida.

Tables

Table 1. 

Data set for Example.

Location

Measured time (seconds) to fill bottle

1

110 (low #3)

2

125

3

130 (high #1)

4

105 (low #2)

5

115

6

145 (high #2)

7

102 (low #1)

8

118

9

150 (high #3)

10

120

11

128

12

125

13

114

14

119

15

112

16

110

17

120

18

111

Footnotes

1.

This document is FS981, one of a series of the Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date December 1997. Revised June 2001. Reviewed August 2012. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2.

Dorota Z. Haman, professor and chair, Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department; and Thomas H. Yeager, professor, Environmental Horticulture Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county's UF/IFAS Extension office.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.