
R. Giesy, L. Ely, B. Broaddus, C. Vann, A. Bell, and A. De Vries2
The Dairy Business Analysis Project (DBAP) was initiated in 1996 by the University of Florida in an effort to measure and document the financial performance of Florida dairy farms using standardized accounting measures. The University of Georgia has been a formal collaborator since 1998. A committee of dairy farmers appointed by Southeast Milk, Inc. oversees the project and helps direct its course. The DBAP website is http://dairy.ifas.ufl.edu/dbap/index.shtml.
Financial data for the year 2005 were collected from participating dairy farms and screened for completeness and validity. Each dairy farm then received a benchmark report detailing its financial results compared to the average results for the other participants and the six dairy farms with the highest net farm income per cwt. This benchmark report is discussed with the dairy farms to identify challenges and opportunities for improvement.
This publication is a summary of the financial performance of the dairy farms that participated in 2005. It is intended for general use by dairy farmers, the allied industry, and government and educational professionals.
Dairy farms in Florida and Georgia were asked to participate in DBAP. Participants were not a random sample of all dairy farms in the two states. The financial performance results in this publication are therefore not necessarily representative of the results of all dairy farms in Florida and Georgia.
Most of the data were collected by extension agents when visiting dairy farms using a standardized data collection spreadsheet. Occasionally, data were sent in by the dairy farms. The financial data were either entered into the spreadsheet on the farm or mailed in on paper copies of the spreadsheet.
The accounting methods followed the recommendations made by the Farm Financial Standards Council.3 All revenues and expenses were accrual adjusted. Cash receipts and expenses were therefore adjusted for changes in inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and accounts receivable. Depreciation data were often taken from tax records. Asset valuation was based on market values if available, but the changes from January 1 to December 31 were kept small. Unpaid management was valued at $50,000 per farm. Gain or loss on sale of purchased livestock resulted when livestock depreciation did not completely account for the gain or loss in the value of the purchased livestock during 2005. Appreciation resulted when machinery and building depreciation did not completely account for the gain or loss in the value of these capital assets during 2005. The bottom line of each dairy farm is its net farm income. Net farm income is the return to the owner and unpaid family members for their labor, management, and equity in the dairy farm. It is the total income available for owner's salary, new investments, taxes, and paying off principal.
All submitted data were carefully scrutinized and checked for completeness. The cash flow statement reconciles the net cash flow resulting from the reported operating, investing, and financing activities with the reported available cash on the January 1 and December 31 balance sheets. The equity statement reconciles the changes in equity through reported retained capital and valuation with the calculated equity on the balance sheets. The reconciliation attempts typically result in unresolved imbalances. Both cash flow imbalance and equity imbalance had to be less than 10% to be included in the summary results reported here.
All results in this publication are the simple averages of the statistics of the dairy farms with valid data. Every dairy farm has equal weight. For example, assume a 100-cow herd produced 1,700,000 lbs of milk (17,000 lbs/cow) and a 1000-cow herd produced 19,000,000 lbs of milk (19,000 lbs / cow). Average milk yield per farm is (19,000,000 + 1,700,000) / 2 = 10,350,000 lbs and average herd size is (100 + 1000) / 2 = 550 cows. The weighted average milk yield per cow is 10,350,000 / 550 = 18,818 lbs/cow. The simple average milk yield per cow is (17,000 + 19,000) / 2 = 18,000 lbs/cow.
Some definitions and calculation rules are as follows:
Asset turnover ratio = total revenues / average assets
Assets = value of assets on the balance sheet
Average assets = average of value of assets on January 1 and December 31
Average equity = average of value of equity on January 1 and December 31
• Capital replacement and term debt repayment margin = Net Farm Income from Operations (NFIFO) + depreciation + interest on term debt – net social security and income taxes – owner withdrawals – annual scheduled payments on term debt and capital leases
Cash flow coverage ratio = (cash revenues – cash expenses) / current liabilities
Current assets = short-term assets that can be utilized within one year
Current liabilities = liabilities due within one year
Current ratio = current assets / current liabilities
Debt to asset ratio = liabilities / assets
Debt to equity ratio = liabilities / equity
Depreciation expense ratio = depreciation / total revenue
Equity = assets - liabilities
Equity to asset ratio = equity / assets
FTE = full time equivalent worker, on average 54 hours per week
Interest expense ratio = interest paid / total revenue
Liabilities = value of liabilities on the balance sheet
Net farm income = NFIFO + gain on sale of capital assets
NFIFO = net farm income from operations
NFIFO ratio = NFIFO / total revenue
Operating expense ratio = (total operating expenses – depreciation) / total revenue
Operating profit margin ratio = (NFIFO + interest paid – unpaid management) / total revenues
Rate of return on dairy assets = (NFIFO + interest paid – unpaid management) / average assets
Rate of return on equity = (NFIFO – unpaid management) / average equity
Std = standard deviation
Term debt and capital lease coverage ratio = (NFIFO + non dairy income + depreciation + interest paid on term debt – net social security and income taxes – owner withdrawals) / (annual scheduled payments on term debt and capital leases)
Working capital = current assets - current liabilities
Summary results are presented in Tables 1.1 to 4.4 and Figures 1 to 5. Revenues and expenses may not add up due to rounding. In brief, twenty-one dairy farms were included in the summary results. Of these, 15 were located in Florida and 6 in Georgia. The average herd size of the participating dairies was 1045 cows and 538 heifers with 18,322 lbs. milk sold per cow. The average culling rate was 36%. The average milk price was $18.24. Average total revenues were $20.73 per cwt. milk sold. Total expenses averaged $20.20 per cwt. sold. The largest items were purchased feed, $7.22, and personnel costs, $3.50. Net farm income from operations averaged $0.53 per cwt. sold. Net farm income per cwt. was $0.07.
DBAP 2005 Summary - Net farm income ($/cwt) by heifers per cow.
DBAP 2005 Summary - Net farm income per cwt ($) by average number of cows. The x-axis is not displayed to avoid possible identification of dairy farms.
DBAP 2005 Summary - Business size and production efficiency by state and overall average, median, and standard deviation.
Overall |
State Averages |
||||
| Category | Average |
Median |
Std1 |
Florida |
Georgia |
Number of farms |
21 |
21 |
21 |
15 |
6 |
Business Size: |
|||||
|
1,045 |
575 |
1,157 |
1,155 |
770 |
|
538 |
290 |
720 |
543 |
527 |
|
20.21 |
10.99 |
22.96 |
21.53 |
16.94 |
|
19 |
12 |
17 |
20 |
16 |
|
569 |
320 |
732 |
633 |
410 |
Production Efficiency: |
|||||
|
18,322 |
18,168 |
3,237 |
17,659 |
19,979 |
|
51 |
52 |
25 |
55 |
40 |
|
0.93 |
0.94 |
0.44 |
0.97 |
0.82 |
|
36% |
32% |
21% |
31% |
47% |
1Standard deviation. 2Full-time equivalent. |
|||||
DBAP 2005 Summary - Revenues and expenses by state and overall average, median, and standard deviation ($/cwt).
Overall |
State Averages |
||||
| Category | Average |
Median |
Std1 |
Florida |
Georgia |
Number of farms |
21 |
21 |
21 |
15 |
6 |
Revenues: |
|||||
Milk sold |
18.24 |
18.28 |
0.62 |
18.38 |
17.89 |
Raised, leased cow sales |
0.89 |
0.33 |
1.41 |
0.60 |
1.62 |
Heifer sales |
0.45 |
0.36 |
0.44 |
0.50 |
0.33 |
Gain on purchased livestock sales |
(0.13) |
(0.06) |
0.83 |
(0.37) |
0.48 |
Other revenues |
1.28 |
0.78 |
1.45 |
1.30 |
1.23 |
Total revenues |
20.73 |
20.24 |
2.21 |
20.41 |
21.55 |
Expenses: |
|||||
|
3.50 |
3.08 |
1.42 |
3.43 |
3.69 |
|
7.22 |
6.81 |
2.33 |
7.96 |
5.36 |
|
0.41 |
0.13 |
0.59 |
0.34 |
0.58 |
|
1.11 |
1.00 |
0.75 |
1.18 |
0.94 |
|
2.01 |
1.92 |
0.90 |
1.99 |
2.06 |
|
1.22 |
1.30 |
0.24 |
1.19 |
1.32 |
|
0.74 |
0.44 |
1.01 |
0.52 |
1.30 |
|
0.67 |
0.56 |
0.61 |
0.69 |
0.61 |
Depreciation: |
|||||
|
1.11 |
0.97 |
1.07 |
1.11 |
1.12 |
|
0.81 |
0.40 |
0.85 |
0.76 |
0.95 |
|
0.39 |
0.25 |
0.42 |
0.37 |
0.44 |
Other expenses |
1.01 |
1.03 |
0.38 |
1.06 |
0.89 |
Total expenses |
20.20 |
18.73 |
3.80 |
20.59 |
19.25 |
Net farm income from operations |
0.53 |
0.84 |
3.20 |
(0.18) |
2.30 |
Gain on sale of capital assets |
(0.46) |
0.00 |
1.37 |
(0.03) |
(1.56) |
Net farm income |
0.07 |
0.84 |
3.54 |
(0.20) |
0.74 |
1 Standard deviation |
|||||
Overall |
State Averages |
||||
| Category | Average |
Median |
Std1 |
Florida |
Georgia |
Number of farms |
21 |
21 |
21 |
15 |
6 |
Liquidity: |
|||||
|
5.78 |
0.61 |
17.47 |
1.53 |
16.42 |
|
123,069 |
21,375 |
673,678 |
(23,839) |
490,338 |
Solvency: |
|||||
|
0.39 |
0.34 |
0.26 |
0.40 |
0.38 |
|
0.61 |
0.66 |
0.26 |
0.60 |
0.62 |
|
2.47 |
0.52 |
5.88 |
1.75 |
4.26 |
Profitability: |
|||||
|
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.10 |
0.03 |
0.09 |
|
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.35 |
(0.06) |
0.24 |
|
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.17 |
(0.01) |
0.08 |
Financial efficiency: |
|||||
|
0.78 |
0.81 |
0.37 |
0.80 |
0.71 |
|
0.83 |
0.84 |
0.15 |
0.86 |
0.75 |
|
0.11 |
0.10 |
0.06 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
|
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.15 |
(0.01) |
0.10 |
Repayment capacity: |
|||||
|
5.96 |
0.58 |
19.28 |
0.71 |
19.08 |
|
2.90 |
0.42 |
7.30 |
3.77 |
0.72 |
|
321,516 |
69,895 |
971,525 |
193,709 |
641,032 |
1Standard deviation. 2One dairy farm had negative equity. 3Net farm income from operations ratio. 4Term debt and capital lease coverage ratio. 5Capital replacement and term debt repayment margin. |
|||||
DBAP 2005 Summary - Balance sheet by state and overall average, median, and standard deviation ($/cow).
Overall |
State Averages |
||||
| Category | Average |
Median |
Std1 |
Florida |
Georgia |
Number of farms |
21 |
21 |
21 |
15 |
6 |
Balance sheet (January 1): |
|||||
|
428 |
306 |
268 |
316 |
709 |
|
6,800 |
4,176 |
5,763 |
5,502 |
10,044 |
|
507 |
408 |
379 |
581 |
324 |
|
1,810 |
1,825 |
1,163 |
1,668 |
2,164 |
|
4,990 |
2,415 |
6,108 |
3,834 |
7,880 |
Balance sheet (December 31): |
|||||
|
487 |
368 |
317 |
425 |
641 |
|
6,668 |
4,733 |
5,315 |
5,365 |
9,925 |
|
386 |
344 |
414 |
521 |
49 |
|
1,896 |
1,914 |
1,159 |
1,854 |
2,001 |
|
4,772 |
2,657 |
5,724 |
3,511 |
7,924 |
1 Standard deviation |
|||||
DBAP 2005 Summary - Business size and production efficiency by average number of cows and milk per cow.
Average number of cows |
Milk yield (lbs / cow / year) |
|||||
Category |
< 446 |
446- 670 |
> 670 |
< 17,300 |
17,300- 19,500 |
> 19,500 |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
| Business Size: | ||||||
|
261 |
562 |
2,312 |
1,117 |
447 |
1,571 |
|
50 |
348 |
1,218 |
363 |
215 |
1,038 |
|
4.24 |
10.86 |
45.54 |
17.84 |
8.29 |
34.51 |
|
7 |
14 |
36 |
15 |
9 |
33 |
|
142 |
397 |
1,169 |
613 |
298 |
798 |
| Production Efficiency: | ||||||
|
15,777 |
19,225 |
19,963 |
14,950 |
18,420 |
21,594 |
|
37 |
49 |
66 |
58 |
47 |
47 |
|
0.59 |
0.93 |
1.26 |
0.89 |
0.88 |
1.02 |
|
42% |
34% |
31% |
44% |
34% |
29% |
DBAP 2005 Summary - Revenues and expenses by average number of cows and milk per cow ($/cwt).
Average number of cows |
Milk yield (lbs / cow / year) |
|||||
Category |
< 446 |
446- 670 |
> 670 |
< 17,300 |
17,300- 19,500 |
> 19,500 |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
| Revenues: | ||||||
|
17.95 |
18.14 |
18.63 |
18.32 |
18.08 |
18.32 |
|
1.08 |
0.96 |
0.63 |
1.47 |
0.37 |
0.84 |
|
0.38 |
0.34 |
0.64 |
0.37 |
0.36 |
0.63 |
|
0.14 |
(0.46) |
(0.07) |
0.07 |
(0.43) |
(0.03) |
|
2.01 |
1.22 |
0.61 |
2.23 |
1.08 |
0.52 |
|
21.57 |
20.20 |
20.44 |
22.46 |
19.46 |
20.29 |
| Expenses: | ||||||
|
4.04 |
3.63 |
2.85 |
3.31 |
3.96 |
3.24 |
|
7.31 |
7.36 |
6.99 |
7.92 |
7.28 |
6.46 |
|
0.29 |
0.72 |
0.22 |
0.37 |
0.32 |
0.54 |
|
0.95 |
1.53 |
0.85 |
0.93 |
1.04 |
1.35 |
|
2.16 |
1.92 |
1.96 |
2.23 |
1.91 |
1.89 |
|
1.34 |
1.06 |
1.27 |
1.29 |
1.17 |
1.22 |
|
1.37 |
0.57 |
0.29 |
1.00 |
0.96 |
0.27 |
|
0.93 |
0.52 |
0.55 |
0.93 |
0.45 |
0.61 |
| Depreciation: | ||||||
|
1.67 |
0.67 |
0.99 |
1.70 |
0.92 |
0.71 |
|
0.88 |
1.14 |
0.42 |
0.63 |
0.75 |
1.05 |
|
0.23 |
0.53 |
0.41 |
0.41 |
0.09 |
0.66 |
|
1.05 |
1.12 |
0.86 |
1.05 |
1.00 |
0.98 |
|
22.22 |
20.75 |
17.65 |
21.78 |
19.86 |
18.98 |
|
(0.65) |
(0.55) |
2.79 |
0.68 |
(0.40) |
1.31 |
|
(1.23) |
(0.17) |
0.00 |
(0.50) |
(0.77) |
(0.12) |
|
(1.88) |
(0.72) |
2.79 |
0.18 |
(1.17) |
1.19 |
DBAP 2005 Summary - Financial performance by average number of cows and milk per cow.
Average number of cows |
Milk yield (lbs / cow / year) |
|||||
Category |
< 446 |
446-670 |
> 670 |
< 17,300 |
17,300- 19,500 |
> 19,500 |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
| Liquidity: | ||||||
|
0.46 |
12.66 |
4.22 |
1.77 |
0.41 |
15.16 |
|
24,649 |
7,679 |
336,879 |
207,250 |
(32,694) |
194,650 |
| Solvency: | ||||||
|
0.48 |
0.30 |
0.40 |
0.38 |
0.43 |
0.36 |
|
0.52 |
0.70 |
0.60 |
0.62 |
0.57 |
0.64 |
|
5.99 |
0.65 |
0.77 |
0.79 |
5.92 |
0.70 |
Profitability: |
||||||
|
(0.01) |
(0.01) |
0.15 |
0.04 |
(0.00) |
0.09 |
|
(0.08) |
(0.05) |
0.20 |
0.02 |
(0.07) |
0.12 |
|
(0.08) |
(0.02) |
0.15 |
0.01 |
(0.04) |
0.08 |
Financial efficiency: |
||||||
|
0.74 |
0.67 |
0.93 |
0.77 |
0.83 |
0.73 |
|
0.86 |
0.89 |
0.75 |
0.81 |
0.90 |
0.79 |
|
0.13 |
0.11 |
0.09 |
0.12 |
0.09 |
0.12 |
|
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
|
(0.03) |
(0.02) |
0.13 |
0.03 |
(0.02) |
0.06 |
Repayment capacity: |
||||||
|
0.15 |
13.03 |
4.68 |
0.57 |
0.74 |
16.56 |
|
0.53 |
1.49 |
6.67 |
5.11 |
1.30 |
2.28 |
|
(1,170) |
69,793 |
895,924 |
342,885 |
35,085 |
586,576 |
1One dairy farm had negative equity. 2Net farm income from operations ratio. 3Term debt and capital lease coverage ratio. 4Capital replacement and term debt repayment margin. |
||||||
DBAP 2005 Summary - Balance sheet by average number of cows and milk per cow ($/cow).
Average number of cows |
Milk yield (lbs / cow / year) |
|||||
Category |
< 446 |
446- 670 |
> 670 |
< 17,300 |
17,300- 19,500 |
> 19,500 |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
| Balance sheet (January 1): | ||||||
|
336 |
350 |
599 |
334 |
291 |
660 |
|
8,343 |
7,651 |
4,405 |
5,512 |
6,846 |
8,042 |
|
471 |
453 |
599 |
491 |
547 |
484 |
|
1,877 |
1,604 |
1,949 |
1,858 |
1,374 |
2,197 |
|
6,466 |
6,047 |
2,457 |
3,654 |
5,471 |
5,844 |
| Balance sheet (December 31): | ||||||
|
374 |
311 |
775 |
541 |
242 |
676 |
|
8,526 |
6,726 |
4,751 |
5,715 |
7,017 |
7,271 |
|
223 |
304 |
631 |
410 |
259 |
490 |
|
2,061 |
1,623 |
2,004 |
2,015 |
1,504 |
2,169 |
|
6,465 |
5,102 |
2,747 |
3,700 |
5,513 |
5,102 |
DBAP 2005 Summary - Business size and production efficiency by net farm income per cwt and rate of return on assets.
Net farm income ($ / cwt) |
Rate of return on assets (%) |
|||||
Category |
< $(1.13) |
$(1.13) -$2.30 |
> $2.30 |
(3)% |
(3)% - 9.5% |
>9.5% |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
| Business Size: | ||||||
|
591 |
523 |
2,022 |
580 |
435 |
2,100 |
|
373 |
198 |
1,044 |
329 |
161 |
1,101 |
|
11.63 |
9.70 |
39.32 |
11.31 |
8.02 |
40.85 |
|
15 |
10 |
32 |
14 |
9 |
33 |
|
653 |
273 |
782 |
572 |
304 |
795 |
| Production Efficiency: | ||||||
|
17,549 |
18,283 |
19,133 |
17,603 |
17,734 |
19,646 |
|
37 |
55 |
61 |
39 |
47 |
67 |
|
0.65 |
1.00 |
1.13 |
0.70 |
0.83 |
1.27 |
|
33% |
32% |
43% |
34% |
45% |
31% |
DBAP 2005 Summary - Revenues and expenses by net farm income per cwt and rate of return on assets ($/cwt).
Net farm income ($ / cwt) |
Rate of return on assets (%) |
|||||
Category |
< $(1.13) |
$(1.13) - $2.30 |
> $2.30 |
< (3)% |
(3)% - 9.5% |
>9.5% |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
| Revenues: | ||||||
| Milk sold | 18.14 |
18.17 |
18.42 |
18.08 |
17.97 |
18.66 |
| Raised, leased cow sales | 0.95 |
0.25 |
1.47 |
0.83 |
1.13 |
0.76 |
| Heifer sales | 0.44 |
0.33 |
0.58 |
0.48 |
0.26 |
0.58 |
Gain on purchased livestock sales |
(0.48) |
(0.22) |
0.30 |
(0.62) |
0.46 |
(0.07) |
| Other revenues | 2.27 |
0.84 |
0.72 |
2.03 |
1.00 |
0.66 |
| Total revenues | 21.33 |
19.38 |
21.49 |
20.80 |
20.81 |
20.59 |
| Expenses: | ||||||
|
4.60 |
3.11 |
2.80 |
4.48 |
3.13 |
2.70 |
|
8.38 |
7.24 |
6.04 |
8.29 |
6.25 |
6.83 |
|
0.51 |
0.27 |
0.45 |
0.44 |
0.51 |
0.28 |
|
1.56 |
0.84 |
0.94 |
1.43 |
0.95 |
0.88 |
|
1.97 |
2.02 |
2.05 |
1.96 |
2.01 |
2.07 |
|
1.27 |
1.11 |
1.30 |
1.19 |
1.26 |
1.23 |
|
1.14 |
0.67 |
0.42 |
1.00 |
0.93 |
0.29 |
|
0.91 |
0.60 |
0.49 |
0.89 |
0.67 |
0.40 |
| Depreciation: | ||||||
|
1.05 |
0.90 |
1.39 |
1.11 |
1.40 |
0.87 |
|
1.15 |
0.78 |
0.52 |
1.03 |
1.04 |
0.37 |
|
0.54 |
0.21 |
0.42 |
0.47 |
0.34 |
0.33 |
| Other expenses | 1.22 |
1.04 |
0.77 |
1.22 |
0.87 |
0.89 |
| Total expenses | 24.27 |
18.77 |
17.57 |
23.51 |
19.37 |
17.14 |
| Net farm income from operations | (2.94) |
0.60 |
3.92 |
(2.71) |
1.44 |
3.45 |
| Gain on sale of capital assets | (0.94) |
0.00 |
(0.46) |
(0.82) |
(0.53) |
0.00 |
| Net farm income | (3.87) |
0.61 |
3.47 |
(3.53) |
0.91 |
3.45 |
DBAP 2005 Summary - Financial performance by net farm income per cwt and rate of return on assets.
Net farm income ($ / cwt) |
Rate of return on assets (%) |
|||||
Category |
< $(1.13) |
$(1.13) - $2.30 |
> $2.30 |
< (3)% |
(3)% - 9.5% |
>9.5% |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
| Liquidity: | ||||||
|
1.02 |
12.16 |
4.17 |
0.99 |
13.96 |
4.25 |
|
(307,705) |
24,654 |
652,257 |
(275,332) |
74,306 |
620,181 |
| Solvency: | ||||||
|
0.39 |
0.45 |
0.34 |
0.41 |
0.44 |
0.33 |
|
0.61 |
0.55 |
0.66 |
0.59 |
0.56 |
0.67 |
|
2.90 |
3.94 |
0.57 |
2.70 |
4.38 |
0.57 |
Profitability: |
||||||
|
(0.06) |
0.03 |
0.16 |
(0.06) |
0.03 |
0.17 |
|
(0.27) |
0.10 |
0.24 |
(0.25) |
0.13 |
0.25 |
|
(0.17) |
0.03 |
0.18 |
(0.15) |
0.05 |
0.18 |
Financial efficiency: |
||||||
|
0.55 |
0.90 |
0.89 |
0.57 |
0.82 |
0.98 |
|
0.97 |
0.84 |
0.69 |
0.96 |
0.78 |
0.74 |
|
0.13 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.08 |
|
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
|
(0.14) |
0.03 |
0.18 |
(0.13) |
0.06 |
0.17 |
Repayment capacity: |
||||||
|
0.08 |
13.12 |
4.67 |
0.23 |
14.84 |
4.89 |
|
1.26 |
0.82 |
6.61 |
1.21 |
0.48 |
6.90 |
|
(324,083) |
60,030 |
1,228,600 |
(291,751) |
74,639 |
1,234,001 |
1One dairy farm had negative equity. 2Net farm income from operations ratio. 3Term debt and capital lease coverage ratio. 4Capital replacement and term debt repayment margin. |
||||||
DBAP 2005 Summary - Balance sheet by net farm income per cwt and rate of return on assets ($/cow).
Net farm income ($/cwt) |
Rate of return on assets (%) |
|||||
Category |
< $(1.13) |
$(1.13) - 2.30 |
> $2.30 |
< (3)% |
(3)% - 9.5% |
> 9.5% |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
| Balance sheet (January 1): | ||||||
|
337 |
302 |
646 |
330 |
428 |
541 |
|
10,601 |
4,794 |
5,004 |
9,766 |
6,119 |
3,993 |
|
570 |
506 |
446 |
535 |
543 |
446 |
|
1,930 |
1,828 |
1,671 |
1,950 |
1,982 |
1,502 |
|
8,672 |
2,966 |
3,332 |
7,816 |
4,137 |
2,491 |
| Balance sheet (December 31): | ||||||
|
288 |
340 |
831 |
288 |
486 |
714 |
|
9,884 |
4,634 |
5,486 |
9,153 |
5,952 |
4,441 |
|
468 |
294 |
397 |
457 |
222 |
446 |
|
2,078 |
1,791 |
1,819 |
2,106 |
2,017 |
1,553 |
|
7,806 |
2,843 |
3,666 |
7,048 |
3,935 |
2,888 |
DBAP 2005 Summary - Business size and production efficiency by assets per cow and liabilities per cow.
Assets ($ / cow) |
Liabilities ($ / cow) |
|||||
Category |
< $4,000 |
$4,000 - $5,600 |
> $5,600 |
< $1,340 |
$1,340 -$2,500 |
> $2,500 |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
| Business Size: | ||||||
|
1,167 |
1,331 |
638 |
1,212 |
1,049 |
874 |
|
710 |
471 |
434 |
886 |
142 |
588 |
|
22.87 |
24.49 |
13.28 |
24.24 |
17.69 |
18.71 |
|
22 |
18 |
17 |
27 |
14 |
17 |
|
426 |
558 |
725 |
608 |
424 |
677 |
| Production Efficiency: | ||||||
|
17,947 |
18,535 |
18,483 |
19,077 |
17,549 |
18,339 |
|
52 |
66 |
34 |
45 |
65 |
43 |
|
0.93 |
1.20 |
0.65 |
0.85 |
1.10 |
0.82 |
|
30% |
33% |
45% |
35% |
29% |
43% |
DBAP 2005 Summary - Revenues and expenses by assets per cow and liabilities per cow ($/cwt).
Assets ($ / cow) |
Liabilities ($ / cow) |
|||||
Category |
< $4,000 |
$4,000 -$5,600 |
> $5,600 |
< $1,340 |
$1,340 -$2,500 |
> $2,500 |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
| Revenues: | ||||||
|
18.53 |
18.31 |
17.88 |
18.26 |
18.55 |
17.92 |
|
0.51 |
0.78 |
1.39 |
0.79 |
0.05 |
1.84 |
|
0.35 |
0.55 |
0.45 |
0.49 |
0.58 |
0.29 |
|
(0.01) |
(0.58) |
0.20 |
0.04 |
(0.40) |
(0.04) |
|
0.80 |
1.30 |
1.73 |
1.03 |
1.02 |
1.78 |
|
20.18 |
20.37 |
21.65 |
20.61 |
19.80 |
21.79 |
| Expenses: | ||||||
|
2.86 |
3.14 |
4.51 |
4.31 |
2.85 |
3.35 |
|
7.64 |
7.88 |
6.14 |
6.95 |
6.90 |
7.81 |
|
0.15 |
0.35 |
0.73 |
0.58 |
0.25 |
0.40 |
|
0.88 |
0.99 |
1.46 |
1.38 |
0.78 |
1.17 |
|
2.30 |
1.37 |
2.37 |
2.60 |
1.67 |
1.76 |
|
1.23 |
1.21 |
1.24 |
1.09 |
1.28 |
1.30 |
|
0.73 |
0.48 |
1.01 |
0.88 |
0.56 |
0.79 |
|
0.51 |
0.59 |
0.90 |
0.13 |
0.62 |
1.24 |
| Depreciation | ||||||
|
1.03 |
1.36 |
0.94 |
0.20 |
1.36 |
1.77 |
|
0.60 |
0.54 |
1.30 |
0.97 |
0.66 |
0.81 |
|
0.21 |
0.33 |
0.62 |
0.31 |
0.25 |
0.61 |
| Other expenses | 1.01 |
0.84 |
1.18 |
1.09 |
0.94 |
1.00 |
| Total expenses | 19.14 |
19.08 |
22.39 |
20.48 |
18.13 |
22.00 |
| Net farm income from operations | 1.04 |
1.29 |
(0.73) |
0.13 |
1.67 |
(0.21) |
| Gain on sale of capital assets | (0.01) |
(0.15) |
(1.22) |
(0.78) |
0.13 |
(0.74) |
| Net farm income | 1.03 |
1.13 |
(1.96) |
(0.65) |
1.80 |
(0.94) |
DBAP 2005 Summary - Financial performance by assets per cow and liabilities per cow.
Assets ($ / cow) |
Liabilities ($ / cow) |
|||||
Category |
< $4,000 |
$4,000 -$5,600 |
> $5,600 |
< $1,340 |
$1,340 -$2,500 |
> $2,500 |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
| Liquidity: | ||||||
|
1.82 |
2.58 |
12.94 |
2.27 |
1.37 |
13.70 |
|
234,881 |
240,634 |
(106,309) |
224,631 |
172,138 |
(27,563) |
| Solvency: | ||||||
|
0.50 |
0.43 |
0.25 |
0.14 |
0.53 |
0.51 |
|
0.50 |
0.57 |
0.75 |
0.86 |
0.47 |
0.49 |
|
6.02 |
0.92 |
0.47 |
0.19 |
4.11 |
3.11 |
Profitability: |
||||||
|
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
0.04 |
0.08 |
0.01 |
|
0.02 |
0.08 |
(0.03) |
0.05 |
0.18 |
(0.16) |
|
0.05 |
0.07 |
(0.07) |
(0.02) |
0.09 |
(0.02) |
Financial efficiency: |
||||||
|
1.13 |
0.81 |
0.39 |
0.77 |
0.96 |
0.61 |
|
0.83 |
0.80 |
0.87 |
0.91 |
0.77 |
0.81 |
|
0.09 |
0.11 |
0.13 |
0.07 |
0.12 |
0.14 |
|
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
|
0.05 |
0.06 |
(0.04) |
0.01 |
0.08 |
(0.01) |
Repayment capacity: |
||||||
|
1.10 |
3.89 |
12.88 |
0.92 |
1.11 |
15.83 |
|
1.57 |
6.04 |
1.08 |
1.80 |
6.08 |
0.81 |
|
458,418 |
684,602 |
(178,473) |
499,638 |
349,460 |
115,449 |
1One dairy farm had negative equity. 2Net farm income from operations ratio. 3Term debt and capital lease coverage ratio. 4 Capital replacement and term debt repayment margin. |
||||||
DBAP 2005 Summary - Balance sheet by assets per cow and liabilities per cow ($/cow).
Assets ($/cow) |
Liabilities ($/cow) |
|||||
Category |
< $4,000 |
$4,000 -$5,600 |
> $5,600 |
< $1,340 |
$1,340 -$2,500 |
> $2,500 |
| Number of farms | 7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
| Balance sheet (January 1): | ||||||
|
264 |
392 |
629 |
377 |
407 |
501 |
|
3,194 |
4,380 |
12,825 |
9,048 |
3,622 |
7,730 |
|
539 |
629 |
354 |
350 |
505 |
667 |
|
1,442 |
1,830 |
2,157 |
571 |
1,783 |
3,075 |
|
1,752 |
2,550 |
10,668 |
8,477 |
1,838 |
4,655 |
| Balance sheet (December 31): | ||||||
|
349 |
544 |
566 |
338 |
643 |
478 |
|
3,397 |
4,636 |
11,970 |
8,657 |
3,986 |
7,360 |
|
275 |
541 |
342 |
249 |
509 |
400 |
|
1,614 |
1,972 |
2,103 |
621 |
1,921 |
3,147 |
|
1,784 |
2,665 |
9,867 |
8,037 |
2,065 |
4,213 |
This document is AN179, one of a series of the Department of Animal Sciences, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Published February 2007. Reviewed July 2010. Please visit the EDIS Web Site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
R. Giesy, Extension Agent IV; L. Ely, Professor, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia;; B. Broaddus, Extension Agent I; C. Vann, Extension Agent II; A. Bell, Graduate Student; A. De Vries, Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Sciences; Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611
Farm Financial Standards Council. 1997. Financial Guidelines for Agricultural Producers.
The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal
Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational
information and other services only to individuals and institutions
that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed,
color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital
status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations.
For more information on obtaining other extension publications,
contact your county Cooperative Extension service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service,
University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative
Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place,
Dean.