University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF
Publication #ENY-025

Nematode Management in Cucurbits (Cucumber, Melons, Squash)1

J. W. Noling2

Most cucurbits are extremely susceptible to root nematodes and also are often damaged by sting nematodes; other nematodes occasionally cause some losses. Watermelons are rarely reported to have serious damage by root nematodes when grown in old pastures or after long rotations to grasses to minimize losses to fusarium wilt fungi.

General IPM Considerations

Integrated pest management (IPM) for nematodes requires1) determining whether pathogenic nematodes are present within the field; 2) determining whether nematode population densities are high enough to cause economic loss; and 3) selecting a profitable management option. Attempts to manage nematodes may be unprofitable unless all of the above IPM procedures are considered and carefully followed. Similarly, some management methods pose risks to people and the environment. Therefore, it is important to know that their use is justified by actual conditions in a field and that certified applicators are overseeing their use.


Typical symptoms of nematode injury can involve both above ground and below ground plant parts. Foliar symptoms of nematode infestation of roots generally involve stunting and general unthriftiness, premature wilting, and slow recovery to improved soil moisture conditions, leaf chlorosis (yellowing), and other symptoms characteristic of nutrient deficiency. An increased rate of ethylene production, thought to be largely responsible for symptom expression in tomato, has been shown to be closely associated with root-knot nematode root infection and gall formation. Plants exhibiting stunted or decline symptoms usually occur in patches of nonuniform growth rather than as an overall decline of plants within an entire field (Figure 1 & Figure 2).

Figure 1. 

Plant stunting caused by sting (Belonolaimus longicaudatus) or root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) in various field crops. Note irregular or patchy field distribution of stunted plants rather than throughout the entire field.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Figure 2. 

Reduced stand establishment in cucumber due to root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.).

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

The time in which symptoms of plant injury occur is related to nematode population density, crop susceptibility, and prevailing environmental conditions. For example, under heavy nematode infestation, crop seedlings or transplants may fail to develop, maintaining a stunted condition, or die, causing poor or patchy stand development (Figure 3). Under less severe infestation levels, symptom expression may be delayed until later in the crop season after a number of nematode reproductive cycles have been completed on the crop. In this case, aboveground symptoms will not always be readily apparent early within crop development, but with time and reduction in root system size and function, symptoms become more pronounced and diagnostic.

Figure 3. 

Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) induced stunting and galling of cucumber seedlings. Note the enlarged, tumerous type expansions (galls) of the roots.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Root symptoms induced by sting or root-knot nematodes can oftentimes be as specific as aboveground symptoms. Sting nematode can be very injurious, causing infected plants to form a tight mat of short roots, oftentimes assuming a swollen appearance. New root initials generally are killed by heavy infestations of the sting nematode, a symptom reminiscent of fertilizer salt burn. Root symptoms induced by root-knot cause swollen areas (galls) on the roots of infected plants (Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6). Gall size may range from a few spherical swellings to extensive areas of elongated, convoluted, tumorous swellings, which result from exposure to multiple and repeated infections. Symptoms of root galling can in most cases provide positive diagnostic confirmation of nematode presence, infection severity, and potential for crop damage.

Figure 4. 

Close-up view of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) induced galling of plant roots. Note the enlarged, tuberous type expansions (galls) of the roots.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Figure 5. 

Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne sp.) induced galling of watermelon roots.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Figure 6. 

Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne sp.) induced galling of seedling watermelon roots.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]


For most crop and nematode combinations the damage caused by nematodes has not been accurately determined. Most vegetable crops produced in Florida are susceptible to nematode injury, particular by root-knot and sting nematodes. Plant symptoms and yield reductions are often directly related to preplant infestation levels in soil and to other environmental stresses imposed upon the plant during crop growth (Figure 7). As infestation levels increase so then do the amount of damage and yield loss (Figure 8 & Figure 9). In general, the mere presence of root-knot or sting nematodes suggests a potentially serious problem, particularly on sandy ground during the fall when soil temperatures favor high levels of nematode activity. At very high levels, typical of thosethat might occur under doubling cropping, plants may be killed. Older transplants, unlike direct seed, may tolerate higher initial population levels without incurring as significant a yield loss.

Figure 7. 

Typical nematode induced crop damage relationship in which crop yields, expressed as a percentage of yields that would be obtained in the absence of nematodes, decline with increased population density of nematodes in soil. The tolerance level is identified as the initial or minimal soil population density at which crop damage is first observed.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Figure 8. 

Crop damage relationship in watermelon (Crimson Sweet) to increasing initial soil population densities of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Figure 9. 

Crop damage relationship in watermelon (Charleston Gray) to increasing initial soil population densities of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Field Diagnosis & Sampling

Because of their microscopic size and irregular field distribution, soil and root tissue samples are usually required to determine whether nematodes are causing poor crop growth or to determine the need for nematode management. For nematodes, sampling and management are preplant or postharvest considerations because if a problem develops in a newly planted crop there are currently no postplant corrective measures available to rectify the problem completely once the nematode becomes established. Nematode density and distribution within a field must, therefore, be accurately determined before planting, guaranteeing that a representative sample is collected from the field. Nematode species identification is currently only of practical value when rotation schemes or resistant varieties are available for nematode management. This information must then be coupled with some estimate of the expected damage to formulate an appropriate nematode control strategy.

Advisory or Predictive Sample (Prior to Planting)

Samples taken to predict the risk of nematode injury to a newly planted crop must be taken well in advance of planting to allow for sample analysis and treatment periods, if so required. For best results, sample for nematodes at the end of the growing season, before crop destruction, when nematodes are most numerous and easiest to detect. Collect soil and root samples from 10 to 20 field locations using a cylindrical sampling tube, or, if unavailable, a trowel or shovel (Figure 10). Since most species of nematodes are concentrated in the crop rooting zone, samples should be collected to a soil depth of 6 to 10 inches. Sample in a regular pattern over the area, emphasizing removal of samples across rows rather than along rows (Figure 11). One sample should represent no more than 10 acres for relatively low-value crops and no more than 5 acres for high value crops. Fields that have different crops (or varieties) during the past season or that have obvious differences either in soil type or previous history of cropping problems should be sampled separately. Sample only when soil moisture is appropriate for working the field, avoiding extremely dry or wet soil conditions.

Figure 10. 

The collection of soil samples for nematode analysis can be acquired from the field using either cylindrical sampling tubes, trowels, bucket auger, or shovel.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Figure 11. 

Suggested pattern for collecting preplant soil samples for nematode analysis based on compositing soil from 10-20 field locations.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Diagnostics on Established Plants

Roots and soil cores should be removed to a depth of 6 to 10 inches from 10 to 20 suspect plants. Avoid dead or dying plants, since dead or decomposing roots will often harbor few nematodes. For seedlings or young transplants, excavation of individual plants may be required to insure sufficient quantities of infested roots and soil. Submission of additional samples from adjacent areas of good growth should also be considered for comparative purposes (Figure 12).

Figure 12. 

Suggested strategy for collecting post-plant soil samples for nematode analysis comparing sampling results from areas of good and poor plant growth.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

For either type of sample, once all soil cores or samples are collected, the entire sample should then be mixed thoroughly but carefully, and a 1 to 2 pint subsample removed to an appropriately labeled plastic bag. Remember to include sufficient feeder roots. The plastic bag will prevent drying of the sample and guarantee an intact sample upon arrival at the laboratory. Never subject the sample(s) to overheating, freezing, drying, or to prolonged periods of direct sunlight. Samples should always be submitted immediately to a commercial laboratory or to the University of Florida Nematode Assay Laboratory for analysis. If sample submission is delayed, then temporary refrigerated storage at temperatures of 40 to 60°F is recommended.

Recognizing that the root nematode causes the formation of large swollen areas or galls on the root systems of susceptible crops, relative population levels and field distribution of this nematode can be largely determined by simple examination of the crop root system for root gall severity (Figure 13). Root gall severity is a simple measure of the proportion of the root system that is galled. Immediately after final harvest, a sufficient number of plants should be carefully removed from soil and examined to characterize the nature and extent of the problem within the field. In general, soil population levels increase with root gall severity (Figure 14). This form of sampling can in many cases provide immediate confirmation of a nematode problem and allows mapping of current field infestation. As inferred previously, the detection of any level of root galling usually suggests a nematode problem for planting a susceptible crop, particularly within the immediate areas from which the galled plant(s) were recovered.

Figure 13. 

Field diagnosis for the presence and severity of root-knot nematodes via visual examination of uprooted plant root systems for root galls.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Figure 14. 

Generalized relationship between the number of root-knot nematode juveniles in soil based on the level and severity of plant root galling.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

General Management Considerations

Currently nematode management considerations include crop rotation of less susceptible crops or resistant varieties, cultural and tillage practices, use of transplants, and preplant nematicide treatments. Where practical, these practices are generally integrated into the summer or winter 'offcropping' sequence. It should be recognized that not all land management and cultural control practices are equally effective in controlling plant parasitic nematodes, and varying degrees of nematode control should be expected. These methods, unlike other chemical methods, tend to reduce nematode populations gradually through time. Farm specific conditions, such as soil type, temperature, and moisture, can be very important in determining whether different cultural practices can be effectively utilized for nematode management. In most cases, a combination of these management practices will substantially reduce nematode population levels, but will rarely bring them below economically damaging levels. This is especially true of lands that are continuously planted to susceptible crop varieties. In these cases some form of pesticide assistance will still usually be necessary to improve crop production. For further explanation and details of general management considerations in this document, see the section called “Nematode Management for Vegetable Crops in Florida.”

Chemical Control

Nonfumigant Nematicides

All of the nonfumigant nematicides (Table 1) currently registered for use in cucurbits are soil applied, with the exception of Vydate, which can also be applied foliarly. They must be incorporated with soil or carried by water into soil to be effective. These compounds must be uniformly applied to soil, targeting the application toward the future rooting zone of the plant, where they will contact nematodes or, in the case of systemics, in areas where they can be readily absorbed and taken up into the plant. Placement within the top 2 to 4 inches of soil should provide a zone of protection for seed germination, transplant establishment, and protect initial growth of plant roots from seeds or transplants. Most studies which have been performed in Florida and elsewhere to evaluate nonfumigant nematicides have not always been consistent, either for controlling intended pests or for obtaining consistent economic returns to the grower, particularly when compared with conventional preplant mulched fumigation with a broadspectrum fumigant nematicide (Figure 15). As the name implies, they are specific to nematodes, requiring integrated use of other cultural or chemical pest control measures to manage other weed and disease pests. Many are reasonably mobile and are readily leached in our sandy, low organic soils, thus requiring special consideration to irrigation practices and management.

Figure 15. 

Preplant soil fumigation for nematode control.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Fumigant Nematicides

In Florida, use of broadspectrum fumigants (Table 2) effectively reduces nematode populations and increases vegetable crop yields, particularly when compared with nonfumigant nematicides. Since these products must diffuse through soil as gases to be effective (Figure 16), the most effective fumigations occur when the soil is well drained, in seedbed condition, and at temperatures above 60°F. Fumigant treatments are most effective in controlling root-knot nematode when residues of the previous crop are either removed or allowed to decay. When plant materials have not been allowed to decay, fumigation treatments may decrease but not eliminate populations of root-knot nematodes in soil, particularly nematodes within the egg stage. Crop residues infested with root-knot nematode may also shelter soil populations to the extent that significantly higher rates of application may be required to achieve nematode control. To avoid these problems, growers are advised to plan crop destruction and soil cultivation practices well in advance of fumigation to insure decomposition of plant materials before attempting to fumigate.

In general, the use of soil fumigants has been more consistently effective than non-fumigants for control of root-knot and sting nematodes in Florida. In the fine sands of Florida, dry soils (no more than or less than 12 to 15% available soil moisture content) are considered favorable for soil fumigation. In addition to buffer zones, the new fumigant labels also outline a new series of mandatory Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) to reduce emissions and bystander exposures. These have become new mandatory label requirements effective January 1, 2011. The new GAPs which must be followed during all fumigant applications and which are posing Florida growers significant difficulties include changes in 1) Soil Preparation: “Soil shall be properly prepared” and “field trash must be properly managed." Residue from a previous crop must be worked into the soil to allow for decomposition prior to fumigation.; 2) Soil Moisture: In general, the new soil fumigant labels will indicate that soil moisture in the top nine inches of soil must be between 50% to 80% of soil capacity (field capacity) immediately prior to fumigant application, subject to the exception where soil moisture must exceed field capacity to form a bed (e.g., certain regions in Florida where soil capacity may exceed the 80% allocated above). Following EPA reregistration, the new fumigant labels that went into effect December 1, 2012, detail additional use restrictions based on soil characteristics, buffer zones, requirements for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), mandatory good agricultural practices (GAPs), applicator training certification, and other new rate modifying recommendations.

Figure 16. 

Nematode as aquatic organisms encountering both liquid and gas phase nematicides in soil.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Since the phase out of methyl bromide began in 2005, many different alternative soil fumigants have been evaluated in field trials to characterize pest control efficacy and crop yield response (Table 3). The results of these research trials have provided basis for overall generalization of pesticidal activity for each of the alternative fumigant chemicals. As a standard for comparison, this research has repeatedly demonstrated methyl bromide to be very effective against a wide range of soilborne pests including nematodes, diseases, and weeds. Chloropicrin has proved very effective against diseases but seldom nematodes or weeds. Telone (1, 3-dichloropropene) is an excellent nematicide but generally performs poorly against weeds and diseases. Bacterial pathogens have not been satisfactorily controlled by any of the fumigants. Metam sodium and metam potassium can provide good control of weeds when placed properly in the bed; however, research to evaluate modification of rate, placement, and improved application technology have not resolved all problems of inconsistent pest control. Dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), the newest entry to registered fumigants in Florida, has demonstrated good to excellent control of nematodes, disease, and weeds when coapplied with chloropicrin.

All of the fumigants are phytotoxic to plants and as a precautionary measure should be applied at least 3 weeks before crops are planted. When applications are made in the spring during periods of low soil temperature, these products can remain in the soil for an extended period, thus delaying planting or possibly causing phytotoxicity to a newly planted crop (Figure 17 & Figure 18). Field observations also suggest rainfall or irrigation that saturates the soil after treatment tends to retain phytotoxic residues for longer periods, particularly in deeper soil layers.

Figure 17. 

Sweet corn phytotoxicity to post treatment soil residuals of metham sodium.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Figure 18. 

Crop phytotoxicity of tomato to post treatment soil residuals of 1,3 dichloropropene.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]


In summary, nematode control measures can be conveniently divided into 2 major categories including cultural and chemical control measures. None of these measures should be relied upon exclusively for nematode management. Rather, when practical and economics permit, each management procedure should be considered for use in conjunction with all other available measures for nematode control and used in an integrated program of nematode management. In addition to nematodes, many other pests can cause crop damage and yield losses that further enforce the development of an overall, Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program, utilizing all available chemical and nonchemical means of reducing pest populations to subeconomic levels. An IPM approach further requires that growers attempt to monitor or scout fields for pest densities at critical periods of crop growth.

Explanation of Rates Listed in the Nematicide Tables for Vegetable Crops

Chemicals used to control nematodes include nonfumigant nematicides, fumigant nematicides, and multipurpose fumigants.

"Overall" soil fumigation is done by injecting fumigant from outlets equally spaced across the entire field. Outlets (behind chisels or coulters) are spaced:

1) All fumigants except Vapam (metham sodium): 2 inches; if less than 12 inches, the rate per outlet should be reduced proportionally. The rate of fumigant within the area actually treated should never exceed the maximum overall rate (broadcast rate).

2) Vapam (metham sodium): 5 inches.

"Row" application of fumigants refers to treatment of a relatively narrow band of soil with one or more outlets centered on the planting row. This generally provides adequate protection for annual crops with much less fumigant per acre of field. If two of more outlets are used per row, they should be spaced and the rate per outlet should be the same as for overall treatment. Row fumigant rates in the tables assume use of one outlet per row, with rows 36 inches apart, unless otherwise noted. Wider spacing of rows will require less total fumigant per acre, and closer spacing will require more, than the "Gal/Acre" estimate based on 36row spacing.

The dosage listed for some fumigants should be increased for organic soils (peat and muck); others should not be applied to such soils; see labels.

Rates of nonfumigant materials are given in weight or volume units of formulation. The maximum rate per 1000 ft of row should not be exceeded; wider row spacing will use less total chemical per acre, but closer row spacing must not result in more total material used per acre than the maximum permitted on a broadcast basis.


Table 1. 

Non-fumigant nematicides for cucurbits in Florida.


Broadcast or overall rates

Row rates

Per acre

Per 1000 sq ft

Per acre, 84" row spacing

Per 1000 ft of row, any row spacing

Mocap 15G*



13 lb

2.1 lb

Vydate L

Preplant and planting treatment: Apply 1 to 2 gals/acre (broadcast or use proportionately less for band treatment). Foliar application of 1 to 2 qt /acre in sufficient water to cover foliage uniformly, repeating according to label instructions. Do not apply more than 3 gal per acre per season, or 8 applications per season. Drip chemigation require specific methods and irrigation equipment.

*Cucumbers only. Do not use as a seed furrow treatment or allow products to contact seed. Incorporate 2 to 4 inches into soil immediately after application according to label instructions. Apply in a 12 to 15 inch band on the row at planting.

These products are not as consistently effective against root nematodes as the fumigants, but are registered as indicated.

Table 2. 

Fumigant nematicides for cucurbits in Florida.


Broadcast Application1


Gallons or lbs

per acre

Fl oz/1000 ft/

chisel spaced

12" apart

In the Row Applications

Telone II2,3

9 to 12 gal

26 to 35

For any row spacing, application rates given may be concentrated in the row, but shall never exceed the labeled maximum for broadcast applications. Consult the product label for additional detail.

Telone C-172,3

10.8 to 17.1 gal

31.8 to 50.2

For any row spacing, application rates given may be concentrated in the row, but shall never exceed the labeled maximum for broadcast applications. Consult the product label for additional detail.

Telone C-352,3

13 to 20.5 gal

38 to 60

For any row spacing, application rates given may be concentrated in the row, but shall never exceed labeled maximum for broadcast applications. Consult the product label for additional detail.

Pic-Clor 60

19 to 31.5 gal

57 to 90

For any row spacing, application rates should never exceed the labeled maximum for broadcast applications. Consult the product label for additional detail.

Vapam HL

75 gal


For drip or in-row chisel fumigation, consult product label for proportionately reduced overall rates, drip concentration, and flow modifying directions and procedures.


60 gal


For drip or in-row chisel fumigation, consult product label for proportionately reduced overall rates, drip concentration, and flow modifying directions.

Dimethy2Disulfide (DMDS)

51.3 gal


Compared to broadcast application, apply proportionately less for in the row applications based on the ratio of bed width to row spacing. Consult the product label for additional detail and rate modifying recommendation.

1Gallons /acre and Fl oz / 1000 feet provided only for mineral soils. Higher rates may be possible for heavier textured (loam, silt, clay) or highly organic soils.

2 All of the fumigants mentioned are for retail sale and use only by state certified applicators or persons under their direct supervision. New supplemental labeling, for the Telone products must be in the hands of the user at the time of application. See label details for additional use restrictions based on soil characteristics, buffer zones, and requirements for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

3 Higher application rates are possible in the presensce of cyst-forming nematodes.

Rates are believed to be correct for products named, and similar products of other brand names, when applied to mineral soils. Higher rates are required for muck (organic) soils. However, the grower has the final responsibility to see that each product is used legally; read the label of the product to be sure that you are using it properly.

Table 3. 

Table 3. Generalized Summary of maximum use rate and relative effectiveness of various soil fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide for nematode, soilborne disease, and weed control in Florida.




Rate / A

Relative Pesticidal Activity




1) Methyl bromide 50/50

350 lb

Good to Excellent


Fair to Excellent

2) Chloropicrin2

300 lb

None to Poor



3) Metam Sodium

75 gal




4) Telone II

18 gal

Good to Excellent

None to Poor


5) Telone C17

26 gal

Good to Excellent



6) Telone C35

35 gal

Good to Excellent

Good to Excellent

Poor to Fair

7) Pic-Clor 60

300 lb

Good to Excellent

Good to Excellent

Poor to Fair

8) Metam Potassium

60 gal




9. Dimethyl Disulfide2

53 gal

Good to Excellent

Good to Excellent

Poor to Excellent

1 Recently completed (December 1, 2012) EPA and State of Florida Fumigant Reregistration has many new label changes to maximum application rate, new fumigant product and applicator training certifications, requirement for Fumigant Management Plans (FMP) and personal protective equipment (PPE), buffer zones, mandatory good application practices (GAP), and other new rate and use restrictions and requirements.

2 Broad spectrum pest control achieved when coapplied with chloropicrin (21% wt/wt). Provides excellent control of nutsedge but poor to fair control of annual grasses and requires the use of a herbicide for adequate control.




This document is ENY-025 (NG025), one of a series of the Entomology & Nematology Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Published March 1999. Revised December 2012. For more publications related to horticulture/agriculture, please visit the EDIS Website at


J. W. Noling, professor, Entomology and Nematology Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL 33850.

The use of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information. UF/IFAS does not guarantee or warranty the products named, and references to them in this publication does not signify our approval to the exclusion of other products of suitable composition. Use pesticides safely. Read and follow directions on the manufacturer's label.

The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county's UF/IFAS Extension office.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.