• Topics: Environmental Horticulture | Cultural Practices for Tomato | North Florida REC-Quincy | Olson, Stephen M | Rich, Jimmy R | Rhoads, Frederick M | Entomology and Nematology | Paret, Mathews L

A Low Input, Sustainable Production System for Fresh Market Tomatoes¹

Introduction

Fresh market tomato is an important vegetable crop in Florida. During the 2009 season, the crop was grown on over 33,000 acres and was valued at over 390 million dollars. The production system, almost universally practiced by growers in Florida, is an intensively managed raised-bed system which includes soil fumigation, polyethylene mulch, drip or seepage irrigation, and stakes. This system produces yields that can exceed 30 tons/acre and has been widely used for over 40 years. Fumigation with a mixture of methyl bromide and chloropicrin has been a critical component for managing soil-borne pests including diseases, nematodes and weeds. However, methyl bromide is scheduled for total phase-out in the United States in the near future due to its potential to deplete ozone.

With the impending loss from use of methyl bromide, intensive efforts have been made by growers and scientists to develop methyl bromide alternatives, mainly in the form of soil-applied fumigants. Data from a series of tests conducted statewide have identified mixtures of 1,3-dichloropropene (Telone II) and chloropicrin as the most likely alternatives to methyl bromide for disease management. These fumigant alternatives, however, provide poor weed control and less than optimal nematode management for second crops.

An effective yet little used pest management practice in tomato production systems is rotation with perennial grasses (sod-based production systems). For example, watermelon growers have traditionally sought bahiagrass sod fields which have lower levels of weeds, pathogenic fungi, and plant-parasitic nematodes. In fact, sod-based rotation is still widely used in many southeastern U.S. production areas. Production systems with perennial grasses such as bahiagrass not only reduce soil-borne pest and weed problems but are also known to provide nutrient recycling, improved soil tilth, organic matter, and increased water holding capacities.

Plant resistance is another important practice that can be used in tomato pest management systems. During the development of the raised-bed production system, availability of plant disease resistance in tomato to nematodes and soil-borne fungi was limited. However in subsequent years, both the range of resistance and incorporation of resistances into highly productive tomato varieties have increased dramatically. For example, a number of fresh market tomato varieties available in Florida now have resistance to Verticillium (race 1) and Fusarium wilts (races 1, 2, 3), and root-knot nematode diseases. Due to pathogen adaptability, plant resistance is seldom recommended as a single control practice but rather used in an integrated management system consisting of rotation or chemicals.

With the horticultural improvements for disease resistance in tomatoes and the well-known record of sod-based rotation systems, combinations of these two practices could prove adequate without use of fumigation in most Florida tomato production fields. This is particularly relevant with improved scouting and prediction methods. The utilization and testing of sod-based systems plus disease resistance in tomato, however, has been precluded by dependence on methyl bromide and other soil fumigants. Thus, little work has been conducted to determine either the merit or limitations of these two practices as replacements for soil fumigation. In the very least, these pest management practices could augment chemical alternatives that are replacing methyl bromide.

A Strip Tillage System

Ten field trials were conducted over five years on well established 'Pensacola' bahiagrass at the North Florida Research and Education Center, Quincy. Strip tillage was applied in bahiagrass sod and tomatoes subsequently transplanted into the strips. The main factors explored were: 1) sod management with mowing and herbicides, 2) strip tillage widths, 3) fertilizer rates, and 4) disease management. A summary of findings and observations from these trials are listed below.

Cultural Practices and Weed Management

The bahiagrass pasture chosen should be a solid stand at least three-years-old and have little weed growth. This period of time is required to establish a good stand of bahiagrass that does not contain weeds which may serve as hosts to plant disease and insect pests. Row spacing of four to six feet wide can be used since no bed is formed. In fact, 4 feet wide row spacings have produced higher yields than the 6 feet wide normal spacings in our tests. Bahiagrass strips should be killed with glyphosate herbicide (sold as Roundup, Touchdown, Glyphomax, etc.) and then aggressively roto-tilled two months prior to transplanting. Strips should be a minimum of 24-inches-wide and on 48” to 72” centers. After the initial strip tillage operations, pre-plant fertilizer can be applied and mixed into soil. For weed suppression before transplanting, apply a recommended pre-plant herbicide into the tilled strip (Table 1). Under these conditions, weed management should be minimal with the exception of managing the bahiagrass growth in and between rows. To do so, mow the bahiagrass as needed and/or apply the herbicide sethoxydim (Poast) or clethodim (Select, Arrow) at low labeled rates. These herbicides are used to stunt or reduce growth of the bahiagrass since we generally do not want to totally kill the grass. A herbicide is best used immediately before transplanting in the tilled strips, and 2-4 wks after transplanting in rows and middles to stunt growth of the bahiagrass and reduce its competition for fertilizer.

A summary of studies evaluating tomato yield as influenced by sod growth management practices in middles are shown in Table 2. These data show that tomato yields in the 24-inch-wide tilled strips were superior to those in the 15-inch-wide strips. Tomato yield in the mowed treatment with 180 lb/A of N and 24-inch-wide tilled strips was almost twice that of the ½ rate of Poast treatment with 180 lb/A of N and 15-inch tilled strips. The full rate of Poast and Gramoxone (paraquat) plus the 24-inch tilled strips gave highest yield with 180 lb/A of N. However, there is a danger of damaging tomato plants with paraquat and using a third application of a grass herbicide to replace the paraquat may be as effective.

Fertilization

As noted earlier, it was found that bahiagrass was a strong competitor with the tomatoes for fertilizer and water. However, with use of appropriate herbicides, competition is limited and fertilizer management is similar to that of conventional systems. Fertilizer N, P₂O₅ and K₂O recommendations for tomato from the Florida Agricultural Extension Service are shown in Table 3. A nitrogen rate of 200 lb/A is recommended for tomato in the raised bed, plastic mulch production system. In our tests, near maximum yields were obtained in strip-tilled tomato with 180 lb/A of N where tilled strip width was 24 inches and sod growth in middles was adequately controlled (Table 2). Extension service soil test recommendations for tomato with very low levels of soil P and K are 150 lb/A of P₂O₅ and 225 lb/A of K₂O. Strip-tilled tomato did not respond to P₂O₅ levels above 160 lb/A. A response of strip-tilled tomato to K₂O levels between 130 and 260 lb/A was observed in only one of the field trials. All P₂O₅, 50% of K₂O and all dolomite, if needed, should be incorporated into the strips before transplanting. Additional potassium should be applied through the drip system at 10% per week at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 weeks after transplanting to minimize leaching and reduce competition from bahiagrass. Nitrogen, at the normal 200 lb actual/acre rate, is recommended with application of 40% incorporated into the tilled strip before transplanting, and 10% per week through the drip system at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 weeks after transplanting, also to minimize leaching and competitive uptake by the bahiagrass.

Disease Management

The use of tomato cultivars with multiple nematode and fungal resistances is very important in both the conventional and the strip tillage system. In the field trial reported in Table 4, tomato exhibited good yields and no significant differences in yield or percent marketable fruit were found between a conventional fumigant treatment (Telone C-35) and the non-treated control. Significant differences in yield were observed among tomato varieties, but these were related to differing yield potentials of the varieties and resistance to tomato spotted wilt (TSW). Soil-borne fungal diseases were not detected in tomatoes and root galling caused by nematodes was not detected or at very low levels in the Telone C-35 and non-treated control plots. In those cases where root-galling was found, it was only present in tomato varieties without the Mi-gene resistance. These data show the importance of using varieties resistant to nematodes and other plant diseases since previously weedy spots in the bahiagrass could harbor pockets of disease-causing organisms.

Other Practices

Other tomato production practices in the strip tillage system are similar to those used in raised-bed production. Normal foliar pesticide application schedules are maintained, and tomato plants are staked. An insecticide for wireworms, cutworms and mole crickets may be necessary. In our tests, only mole crickets were a problem and in only one spring trial. An additional consideration is use of subsoiling in the planting row. Subsoiling not only increases tomato rooting depth but also allows for easier and deeper stake placement. The amount of irrigation may need to be increased because of greater evaporation in the absence plastic mulch. Tensiometers installed in tilled strips between plants and observed daily will be valuable to help determine when to irrigate. Tensiometers have a readable scale between 0 and 100 cb with 0 being wet and 100 dry, the ideal range is 5 to 20. Plastic mulch application may be used in the strip-till system for soil warming and weed management. However, equipment will need to be modified or built for applying the mulch.

Advantages

The strip-till tomato production system offers many advantages compared to the conventional production system. The conventional raised-bed plastic mulch system creates conditions that favor the outbreak of many plant pests. Windblown soil created by bare row middles leads to plant injury, which increases foliar diseases. Rain splash dispersal of plant pathogens is increased on bare soil, and populations of key insect pests may be increased. Benefits of strip tillage into bahiagrass include reductions in production costs associated with land preparation, no fumigant costs, and reduced erosion due to storm water runoff. Sod-based rotation minimizes the increase of soil-borne pests and reduces the effect of soil compaction due to repeated movement of heavy machinery over the same area. Limited but sound economic data show that grower profits can be increased using this strip tillage system due to fewer inputs required compared to the conventional tomato production system (Chellemi et al. 1999)

Conclusion

Over six million acres of bahiagrass are planted in Florida. This represents a largely untapped resource for Florida tomato growers and indeed other vegetable growers. The present strip-till system will allow for good tomato production and a quick return to grazing since the bahiagrass is not destroyed as in the conventional system. More research and farmer experience is needed to improve tomato production in the strip tillage system. However, this system offers the potential for tomato production that is more environmentally sound and could to help the industry remain competitive.

References

Chellemi, D. O., F. M. Rhoads, S. M. Olson, J. R. Rich, D. Murray, G. Murray, and D. M. Sylvia. 1999. An alternative, low input production system for fresh market tomato. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 14:59-68.

Olson, S. M., W. M. Stall, G. E. Vallad, S. E. Webb, S. A. Smith, E. H. Simonne, E. J. McAvoy, and B. M. Santos. Tomato production in Florida. In: S. M. Olson and Eric Simonne, Vegetable Production Guide for Florida, 2009-2010, University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Gainesville, FL, pp. 295-312.

Rhoads, F. M., S. M. Olson, J. R. Rich, and D. O. Chellemi. 1998. Strip-till tomato in bahiagrass: Management of fertility and grass in middles. Florida Agricultural Conference and Trade Show Proceedings pp. 38-41.

Rich, J. R., F. M. Rhoads, and S. M. Olson. 2009. Sustainable tomato production system using perennial grass rotation and disease resistant varieties. Acta Horticulturae 809:227-233.

Figure 1. 

A large scale demonstration trial in a farmer's field.

[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Tables

The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, Dean.

• Copyright 2012 |
• Site Feedback |
• About This Site