
Mites are among the most difficult arthropod pests to control on ornamental plants. Adult mites have eight legs and piercing/sucking mouthparts that are used to suck fluids from the cells of host plants (Denmark, 1969). The first immature stage of a mite, referred to as the larva, has only six legs, like insects. The exceptions are the Eriophyid mites, which have four legs in all stages. Mites are not insects, but are more closely related to spiders and ticks. Thousands of species of mites feed on plants.
Spider mites, members of the Tetranychidae family, are perhaps the most important mite pests of ornamental plants. The name, spider mites, is due to the many members of this family that produce silk webbing. Spider mites are medium-sized mites that feed on a wide variety of host plants from many different plant families. Some spider mites are bamboo, Lewis, southern red, spruce, tumid and twospotted mites.
Members of the false spider mites family, Tenuipalpidae, do not produce silk webbing, but a number of these species feed on ornamental plants. False spider mites are generally smaller than spider mites. Examples of false spider mites are flat and red palm mites.
Some Tarsonemid mites (family Tarsonemidae) are smaller than even false spider mites. This family includes broad and cyclamen mites.
Eriophyid mites (Eriophyidae family) are too small to be seen with the naked eye and include bud, gall, purple tea and rust mites, among others. As their names suggest, these mites can cause galls, rusts and other abnormal plant growth.
There are other families of mites that have crop-damaging members, but the mites named above are the main mite pests of ornamental plants.
Mites of a given species can develop very rapidly when temperatures, relative humidities, host plants and other factors are optimal. In fact, for many, the time to develop from an egg to an adult can be less than a week. Generally, development occurs more rapidly at higher temperatures, up to a point. Due to mites’ rapid development, scouting should be performed frequently (at least once per week), and miticide applications may need to be made on weekly or more-frequent intervals (be sure to check the miticide labels for instructions and restrictions associated with spray intervals) during the summer.
Frequent, careful inspection of plants is necessary to detect mite infestations before they reach epidemic levels and cause severe plant damage. By the time plant symptoms become very obvious to the unaided eye, control of the mites will be difficult and potentially expensive. Early detection can limit damage and facilitate economical control of mites. Careful inspection is necessary because damage due to mites can, on some plants, resemble that from other causes. For example, symptoms can look similar to insect feeding, nutritional deficiencies, physiological stress, herbicide damage, etc.
Since many mites feed on the undersides of leaves, these are important sites to check. Spider mites can usually be detected on older leaves, whereas Tarsonemids are often found on young leaves. False spider mites often feed near the midrib or veins. Silvery speckling/stippling of the upper leaf surface is a characteristic symptom of leaf feeding. Fine thread-like webbing may also be present (spider mites). Mites may also feed on petioles, stems, buds and other plant parts. Mite feeding can cause a multitude of symptoms, such as leaf cupping, discoloration, distortion, spotting, speckling and stunting, stem russeting and discoloration, as well as distorted and discolored flowers.
Because mites are so small, the use of a magnifying hand lens (10x) will make it easier to observe them. Another technique frequently used to detect mites, especially on crops with fine foliage like ornamental asparagus, is to slap stems firmly on a light-colored surface, such as a white painter’s palette or a sheet of white paper on a clipboard. If mites are present, they will be easily seen as small, moving spots.
Both biological control agents and miticides are available for controlling mites. For example, the predatory mites, Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis, can effectively control twospotted spider mites. At least 15 other predators are commercially available for control of this and other pests (Osborne and Peña, 1997). P. persimilis has been used successfully to control twospotted spider mites on many plants growing in protected culture (greenhouses and shadehouses). N. californicus is just as effective, and it tolerates pesticide residues better than P. persimilis and also feeds on broad mites [Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks)]. For more information on biological control of mites, refer to the following Web site: http://mrec.ifas.ufl.edu/lso/SpMite/b853a1.htm.
A listing of commercial suppliers of biological mite control agents is available at the following Web site: http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pestmgt/ipminov/bensuppl.htm.
Besides frequently scouting crops to detect mite infestations early, growers should avoid using pesticides that are harmful to eggs, immatures and adults of predatory mites. Companies that supply mite predators furnish customers with lists delineating the effects of pesticides on the predators. (See “side effects” at the following Web site: http://www.biobest.be and http://www.koppert.nl/e005.shtml)].
For chemical mite control, the use of broad-spectrum insecticides/miticides (especially products with long-lived residual activity, such as the pyrethroids listed in Table 1) is generally not recommended. These insecticides/miticides may directly or indirectly harm beneficial insects and/or mites, and a rapid increase in existing plant-feeding mite populations may result. Use of the insecticide carbaryl is also known to occasionally increase twospotted spider mite infestations on susceptible plants. Therefore, selective chemicals that specifically target plant-feeding mites should be used.
Predatory mites must be released as soon as pest mites are detected, and the number of predatory mites released must be sufficient to ensure control of the pest mites (Osborne et al., 1985). As mentioned previously, check with biological control suppliers for guidance and to find out which predatory-mite strains are resistant or susceptible to specific pesticides. This information can help in making decisions regarding pesticide use. For more information on biological control, see Osborne and Peña, 1997.
Although mites can become resistant to miticides; several techniques can reduce the likelihood of this happening. First, minimize miticide usage by incorporating biological and cultural methods into your pest management program. Practice good sanitation methods and use mite resistant crops and varieties. Scout frequently (at least once a week) and only apply miticides when necessary. Design growing areas so all areas can be easily and effectively treated.
Do not use miticides with the same mode of action in succession. Rather, practice long-term rotations, using as many products with different modes of action as possible. For example, carbamates and organophosphates both work by inhibiting the enzyme acetylcholinesterase, which is important in the proper functioning of the nervous system. Most of the other classes of miticides have different modes of action. Table 1 lists miticides commonly used on ornamental crops and the mode of action groups for these miticides. Active ingredients, trade names, formulations and labeling (application locations, restricted use designations, restricted entry intervals [REIs] and manufacturer/distributors' names are also given. Users of any pesticide should make sure they have the current label since labels may change over time. In addition, users should read labels in their entirety and comply with the label’s directions and restrictions. Table 2 lists the addresses of the manufacturers/distributors of the miticides listed in Table 1. Another useful strategy for controlling mites is to include products with a non-specific mode of action, where possible, into a rotation. This group includes insecticidal soaps and horticultural oils.
Miticides should only be used as labeled (“the label is the law”). Fortunately, some miticides have general labeling that allows them to be used, at the grower’s risk, on a broad range of crops not specifically listed on the label. Prudent growers should test multiple applications of any miticide if it is likely that it will be used more than once. In addition, to enhance miticide efficacy, surfactants and adjuvants maybe included if there are no label restrictions.
Allow sufficient time after treating the test plants for phytotoxicity symptoms to develop. If a new miticide will be used in tank mixes or in close sequences with other pesticides, evaluate the potential for plant injury (phytotoxicity) on a small number (about 10) of plants of each species and cultivar before treating all the plants of each crop. These tolerance tests should take into consideration the potential interactions with other pesticides used in the pest control program.
It is essential to read pesticide labels since all restrictions related to where each product can be used (greenhouse, shadehouse, interiorscape, outdoor field nursery, outdoor nursery, landscape, residential landscape), how it can be applied (chemigation, spray, aerial, etc.), on what growing media it can be used, etc., must be observed. State and local labeling may differ from and be more restrictive than federal labeling. Pesticide applicators should always review product labels before using any pesticide and have all pertinent labels (including supplemental labels) in their possession prior to use of any pesticide.
Denmark, H. A. 1969. Two-spotted spider mite on chrysanthemum. Fla. Dept. of Agr. and Consumer Serv., Div. of Plant Industry, Ento. Circ. No. 89.
Osborne, L. S., L. E. Ehler and J. R. Nechols. 1985. Biological control of the twospotted spider mite in greenhouses. Univ. of Fla., Inst. of Food and Agr. Sci., Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 853 (technical) http://mrec.ifas.ufl.edu/lso/SpMite/b853a1.htm.
Osborne, L. S. and J. Peña. 1997. More than you want to know about mites and their biological control on ornamentals. Proc. of the 13th Society of American Florists’ Conference on Insect and Disease Management on Ornamentals. pp. 53–85.
Sabelis, M. W. 1981. Biological control of twospotted spider mites using phytoseiid predators. I. Agric. Res. Report 910, Pudoc, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Zhang, Z. 2003. Mites of Greenhouses: Identification, Biology and Control. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Selected products for use in controlling mites on ornamental plants
Table 1 must be viewed in its pdf format. |
List of miticide manufacturers/distributors.
Company/Division |
Address |
City |
State/ Province |
Zip Code |
URL |
Bayer Environmental Science |
2 T.W. Alexander Drive |
Research Triangle Park |
NC |
27709 |
|
Brandt Consolidated Industries |
2935 S. Koke Mill Rd. |
Springfield |
IL |
62711 |
|
Cheminova |
Wayne |
NJ |
|||
Dow AgroSciences |
9330 Zionsville Rd |
Indianapolis |
IN |
46268 |
|
Drexel Chemical |
1700 Channel Avenue |
Memphis |
TN |
38113 |
|
EcoSMART/EcoIPM |
318 Seaboard Lane, Ste 208 |
Franklin |
TN |
37067 |
|
Florikan E.S.A. |
1523 Edger Place |
Sarasota |
FL |
34240 |
|
FMC/Agricultural Products Group |
1735 Market Street |
Philadelphia |
PA |
19103 |
|
Gowan |
370 Main Street |
Yuma |
AZ |
85366 |
|
Helena Chemical |
225 Schilling Blvd. |
Collierville |
TN |
38017 |
|
JH Biotech |
4951 Olivas Park Dr |
Ventura |
CA |
93003 |
|
Makhteshim-Agan of North America (MANA) |
4515 Falls of Neuse Toad, Suite 300 |
Raleigh |
NC |
27609 |
|
OHP |
P.O. Box 230 |
Mainland |
PA |
19451-0230 |
|
Petro-Canada |
P.O. Box 2844 |
Calgary |
Alberta |
T2P 3E3 |
|
Prokoz |
100 North Point Center East, Suite 330 |
Alpharetta |
GA |
30022-8242 |
|
Quali-Pro |
4515 Falls of Neuse Toad, Suite 300 |
Raleigh |
NC |
27609 |
|
Regal Chemical |
600 Branch Drive |
Alpharetta |
GA |
30004 |
|
Scotts Company, The |
14111 Scottslawn Road |
Marysville |
OH |
43041 |
|
SePRO |
11550 North Meridian Street, Suite 600 |
Carmel |
IN |
46032 |
|
Southern Agricultural Insecticides |
P.O. Box 218 |
Palmetto |
FL |
34221 |
|
Stoller Enterprises |
4001 W Sam Houston Pkwy N, Suite 100 |
Houston |
TX |
77043 |
|
Syngenta Professional Products |
P.O. Box 18300 |
Greensboro |
NC |
27419 |
|
United Phosphorus, Inc. |
630 Freedom Business Center, Ste. 402 |
King of Prussia |
PA |
19406 |
|
Valent Professional Products |
1701 Gateway Blvd., Suite 385 |
Richardson |
TX |
75080 |
|
Wellmark International |
1501 E. Woodfield Rd., Suite 200 West |
Schaumburg |
IL |
60173 |
|
Whitmire Micro-Gen Research Laboratories |
3568 Tree Court Industrial Blvd. |
St. Louis |
MO |
63122 |
This document is ENH1118, one of a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date, April 2009. Visit the EDIS Web site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
Robert H. Stamps, professor, Environmental Horticulture Department, and Lance S. Osborne, professor, Entomology and Nematology Department, and associate director, Mid-Florida Research and Education Center--Apopka, FL, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal
Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational
information and other services only to individuals and institutions
that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed,
color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital
status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations.
For more information on obtaining other extension publications,
contact your county Cooperative Extension service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service,
University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative
Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Millie Ferrer-Chancy,
Interim Dean.