University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF
Publication #FE806

2007 Agricultural Census Tidbit: Dominant Farm Organizational Structure in Florida Is Small Family Farms1

Rodney L. Clouser2

Introduction

The 2007 agricultural census data were reported for states and counties throughout the United States in February 2009. National, state, and local policy makers look forward to the census report for several reasons: they use the information to show the importance and size of the industry in their state and counties, and to show the importance of the industry in the state and local economy; and they use the information to make policy decisions. One of the limitations of the agricultural census is that the report, for the most part, is just data with limited or no discussion. This publication is one in a series of five that reorganizes some of the data collected in the census and offers some comments on trends and gaps in the data. The other publications in the 2007 Agricultural Census Tidbit series can be accessed online at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

Many Floridians, including those not directly involved in farm production, keep a close watch on the numbers and types of farms in the state. People's interest in this topic is varied, but Floridians who are not farmers may be concerned that big farms and non-family farms represent an increasing percentage of farms in the state, and they may consider this trend to be undesirable.

Census of Agriculture

The Census of Agriculture is conducted every five years and is an attempt by the U.S. government to collect data on the entire U.S farm population in every state. Of course, not all agricultural producers provide the information requested and there is always the possibility for error in the data reported. A farm is defined as a place in which $1,000 of agricultural products were produced or sold, or typically would have been sold during the census year, including any government payments.

Data in this publication are for 2007 only. While the census has been collecting data on the number of farms by size for years, in 2007 they began collecting information on farm typology. This was done so that farms could be grouped by similar characteristics. In total, eight different categories were tabulated: five under small farms and three under other farms. Typology characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Farm Size and Typology

In 2007 as in the past, Florida data indicated that the primary and dominant organizational structure in Florida agriculture is small farms. The number of farms by acreage categories is reported in Table 2. While the census collects information on farm size in 12 different categories, for this publication the 12 have been combined and reduced to four categories: 1 to 9.9 acres, 10 to 49.9 acres, 50 to 999 acres, and greater than 1,000 acres.

Florida has more than 47,400 farms and of these farms, just over 69 percent are 50 acres or less in size. This ranks Florida as the state with the 4th largest percentage of farms of less than 50 acres. There are several reasons for the relatively small acreage of Florida farms that will be discussed under farm typology, but one obvious reason for relatively small farms is the high-value, intensive nature of commodities produced in Florida. Many sales and much income can be generated from horticulture operations, specialty crops, and some fruit and vegetable crops.

In contrast, Florida only has 2.9 percent of farms greater than 1,000 acres. This places the state in the bottom 20 for farms greater than 1,000 acres. The 2007 census reported the number of farm operations greater than 1,000 acres down, from 1,769 in 2002 to 1,370 in 2007 (a decrease of about 23%). Likewise, farms less than 50 acres increased to over 32,800 in 2007, down from over 28,600 in 2002 (an increase of about 15%). Florida's organizational structure is dominated by small farms, but the acreage in these operations is relatively small. While farms less than 50 acres accounted for 69 percent of farms, acreage in the operations accounted for only five percent of land in farms in 2007. Farms larger than 1,000 acres represent only 2.9 percent of farms in the state but account for 66 percent of land in farms in 2007.

Florida farm typology numbers (Table 3) reveal that the largest number of small farms can be categorized as retirement farms (sales less than $250,000, with the primary occupation of the landowner reported as "retired"), and residential/lifestyle (sales less than $250,000, with the landowner's primary occupation reported as something other than farming). These two categories account for about 60 percent of all small farms in the state. On the opposite end of the scale, only 1.7 percent of farms are considered large (sales between $250,000 and $499,999) and 3.1 percent are categorized as very large (sales greater than $500,000), and only 5.9 percent are structured as nonfamily corporations or as operated by hired managers.

Retirement and residential/lifestyle farms were further reviewed since they are the two largest farm categories in Florida. Data indicated that there are similarities as well as differences when comparing Florida to other southern states (Table 4). For example, 11 of the top 15 states in percentage of farms categorized as retirement were southern states. In terms of residential/lifestyle farms, 11 southern states have a larger percentage of farms identified in this typology category than does Florida. The census does not collect information documenting how individual operators ended up in the typology categories. Local culture, the availability of off-farm employment, or the desire of newcomers to the state to recreate a farming lifestyle like that they remember from their old homes might all be factors influencing retirement and residential/lifestyle typology.

Summary

The dominant organizational structure of agriculture in Florida is individual family farms. Just over 69 percent of Florida agricultural operations are less than 50 acres in size. In terms of farm typology in Florida, the two dominant categories are retirement (23.5%) and residential/lifestyle (34.9%). Together, these two categories account for almost six of every ten agricultural operations in Florida.

References

USDA/NASS. 2007. 2007 Census of Agriculture, United States Summary and State Data, Volume 1, Geographic Area Series, Part 51. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, D.C.

USDA/NASS. 2009. General Explanation and Census of Agriculture Report Form, Appendix B. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, D.C.

Tables

Table 1. 

Farm typology definitions.

Type

Category

Sales Conditions

Other Conditions

Small

     
 

Limited-resource

< $100,000

< $20,000 in income

 

Retirement farms

< $250,000

Operator retired

 

Residential / lifestyle

< $250,000

Primary occupation reported is something other than farming

 

Lower-sales farms

< $100,000

Primary occupation reported is farming

 

Higher-sales farms

$100,000 to $249,999

Primary occupation reported is farming

Other

     
 

Large family farms

$250,000 to $499,999

 
 

Very large family farms

> $500,000

 
 

Nonfamily farms

 

Organized as nonfamily corporations, or operated by hired managers

Table 2. 

Farm operation by size, ranked by 50 acres or less, 2007.

State

1.0 to 9.9 Acres

10.0 to 49.9 Acres

50 to 999.9 Acres

> 1,000 Acres

Total Farms

< 50 Acres

> 1,000 Acres

 

(Value)

(Value)

(Value)

(Value)

(Value)

(%)

(%)

Hawaii

4,813

1,972

621

115

7,521

90.2

1.5

Arizona

9,873

2,657

2,283

824

15,637

80.1

5.3

New Jersey

2,950

4,814

2,455

108

10,327

75.2

1.0

Florida

12,184

20,680

13,229

1,370

47,463

69.2

2.9

Rhode Island

353

484

380

2

1,219

68.7

0.2

Massachusetts

2,199

2,885

2,579

28

7,691

66.1

0.4

California

25,278

28,080

23,220

4,455

81,033

65.8

5.5

Connecticut

1,232

1,894

1,750

40

4,916

63.6

0.8

Oregon

9,546

14,142

12,301

2,564

38,553

61.4

6.7

Washington

9,211

14,790

12,517

2,766

39,284

61.1

7.0

Delaware

651

802

947

146

2,546

57.1

5.7

Utah

4,194

5,127

6,073

1,306

16,700

55.8

7.8

New Mexico

6,471

4,405

6,499

3,555

20,930

52.0

17.0

New Hampshire

754

1,405

1,969

38

4,166

51.8

0.9

Idaho

4,891

7,497

10,478

2,483

25,349

48.9

9.8

Nevada

631

898

1,155

447

3,131

48.8

14.3

North Carolina

5,001

20,772

25,478

1,662

52,913

48.7

3.1

Indiana

9,720

19,533

27,779

3,906

60,938

48.0

6.4

Alaska

165

164

305

52

686

48.0

7.6

Maryland

1,554

4,589

6,325

366

12,834

47.9

2.9

Louisiana

3,282

10,394

14,508

1,922

30,106

45.4

6.4

Michigan

4,219

20,726

29,100

1,969

56,014

44.5

3.5

Tennessee

5,814

29,396

42,722

1,348

79,280

44.4

1.7

Ohio

7,767

24,361

41,019

2,714

75,861

42.4

3.6

South Carolina

1,970

8,959

14,073

865

25,867

42.3

3.3

Maine

1,046

2,383

4,527

180

8,136

42.1

2.2

Georgia

3,504

16,243

26,146

1,953

47,846

41.3

4.1

Pennsylvania

5,601

20,267

36,664

631

63,163

41.0

1.0

Alabama

3,374

16,215

27,655

1,509

48,753

40.2

3.1

Virginia

3,530

15,177

27,351

1,325

47,383

39.5

2.8

Illinois

8,603

20,592

39,835

7,830

76,860

38.0

10.2

Texas

21,024

72,837

142,250

11,326

247,437

37.9

4.6

Colorado

4,276

9,359

17,162

6,257

37,054

36.8

16.9

Arkansas

2,581

15,119

28,465

3,181

49,346

35.9

6.4

Vermont

635

1,862

4,343

144

6,984

35.8

2.1

Kentucky

4,579

25,235

53,701

1,745

85,260

35.0

2.0

New York

2,914

8,799

23,600

1,039

36,352

32.2

2.9

Wisconsin

4,861

19,895

51,751

1,956

78,463

31.6

2.5

West Virginia

1,207

5,749

16,328

334

23,618

29.5

1.4

Mississippi

2,056

10,234

27,425

2,244

41,959

29.3

5.3

Iowa

8,709

17,824

58,872

7,451

92,856

28.6

8.0

Missouri

3,868

25,186

72,963

5,808

107,825

26.9

5.4

Oklahoma

3,802

18,700

56,343

7,720

86,565

26.0

8.9

Minnesota

3,687

16,927

54,190

6,188

80,992

25.5

7.6

Montana

1,917

5,462

12,354

9,791

29,524

25.0

33.2

Wyoming

652

2,004

5,280

3,133

11,069

24.0

28.3

Kansas

2,123

10,041

41,032

12,335

65,531

18.6

18.8

Nebraska

2,270

6,581

27,659

11,202

47,712

18.6

23.5

South Dakota

920

3,898

16,497

9,854

31,169

15.5

31.6

North Dakota

387

2,268

17,465

11,850

31,970

8.3

37.1

Table 3. 

Florida farms by typology, 2007.

Type

Category

Number of Farms

% of Florida Farms

Small

     
 

Limited-resource

7,798

16.4

 

Retirement farms

11,144

23.5

 

Residential / lifestyle

16,561

34.9

 

Lower-sales farms

6,019

12.7

 

Higher-sales farms

877

1.8

Other

     
 

Large family farms

821

1.7

 

Very large family farms

1,455

3.1

 

Nonfamily farms

2,788

5,9

Table 4. 

Farm typology for retirement and residential / lifestyle categories, ranked by state, 2007.

Rank

State

Retirement

 

Rank

State

Residential / Lifestyle

   

(Number)

(%)

     

(Number)

(%)

1

West Virginia

6,420

27.2

 

1

Utah

6,986

41.8

2

Texas

64,462

26.1

 

2

Colorado

15,498

41.8

3

South Carolina

6,561

25.4

 

3

Tennessee

32,824

41.4

4

Alabama

12,350

25.3

 

4

Indiana

24,744

40.6

5

Virginia

11,967

25.3

 

5

Oklahoma

35,061

40.5

6

Mississippi

10,357

24.7

 

6

Texas

99,316

40.1

7

Tennessee

19,385

24.5

 

7

Ohio

30,434

40.1

8

Georgia

11,367

23.8

 

8

Missouri

42,987

39.9

9

Oregon

9,126

23.7

 

9

Kentucky

33,938

39.8

10

Oklahoma

20,447

23.6

 

10

Alabama

18,948

38.9

11

Florida

11,144

23.5

 

11

New Jersey

3,987

38.6

12

Kentucky

19,921

23.4

 

12

West Virginia

9,079

38.4

13

Hawaii

1,744

23.2

 

13

Louisiana

11,473

38.1

14

Louisiana

6,923

23.0

 

14

Mississippi

15,960

38.0

15

New Mexico

4,732

22.6

 

15

South Carolina

9,824

38.0

16

Michigan

12,410

22.2

 

16

Virginia

17,759

37.5

17

North Carolina

11,712

22.1

 

17

Idaho

9,494

37.5

18

Washington

8,571

21.8

 

18

Arkansas

18,434

37.4

19

Missouri

23,491

21.8

 

19

Wisconsin

28,860

36.8

20

California

17,209

21.2

 

20

Georgia

17,514

36.6

21

Utah

3,536

21.2

 

21

Connecticut

1,795

36.5

22

New Jersey

2,124

20.6

 

22

Michigan

20,279

36.2

23

Arkansas

9,932

20.1

 

23

Oregon

13,807

35.8

24

Maryland

2,566

20.0

 

24

Washington

14,066

35.8

25

Ohio

15,071

19.9

 

25

Pennsylvania

22,563

35.7

26

Connecticut

960

19.5

 

26

Maine

2,884

35.4

27

New Hampshire

795

19.1

 

27

New Hampshire

1,472

35.3

28

New York

6,795

18.7

 

28

Kansas

23,056

35.2

29

Pennsylvania

11,755

18.6

 

29

Florida

16,561

34.9

30

Nevada

580

18.5

 

30

Wyoming

3,824

34.5

31

Idaho

4,644

18.3

 

31

Nevada

1,074

34.3

32

Montana

5,312

18.0

 

32

Minnesota

27,722

34.2

33

Kansas

11,690

17.8

 

33

Massachusetts

2,606

33.9

34

Rhode Island

217

17.8

 

34

North Carolina

17,917

33.9

35

Alaska

122

17.8

 

35

Illinois

26,001

33.8

36

Indiana

10,599

17.4

 

36

Maryland

4,341

33.8

37

Illinois

13,359

17.4

 

37

Vermont

2,340

33.5

38

Colorado

6,389

17.2

 

38

Rhode Island

390

32.0

39

Massachusetts

1,301

16.9

 

39

Iowa

29.045

31.3

40

Maine

1,354

16.6

 

40

New York

11,249

30.9

41

Vermont

1,162

16.6

 

41

Alaska

210

30.6

42

Wyoming

1,810

16.4

 

42

Montana

9,016

30.5

43

Wisconsin

12,300

15.7

 

43

California

24,566

30.3

44

North Dakota

5,001

15.6

 

44

Hawaii

2,240

29.8

45

Iowa

13,513

14.6

 

45

New Mexico

5,914

28.3

46

Minnesota

11,548

14.3

 

46

South Dakota

8,565

27.5

47

Arizona

2,161

13.8

 

47

Nebraska

12,927

27.1

48

Delaware

331

13.0

 

48

North Dakota

8,104

25.3

49

South Dakota

3,515

11.3

 

49

Arizona

3,639

23.3

50

Nebraska

5,352

11.2

 

50

Delaware

551

21.6

Footnotes

1.

This is EDIS document FE806, a publication of the Food and Resource Economics Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Published November 2009. Reviewed January 2013. Please visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2.

Rodney L. Clouser, professor and extension public policy specialist, Food and Resource Economics Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, Dean.