
Lisa A. Guion, Janet Harper Golden, and David C. Diehl2
This paper is the eighth in a series of articles on planning programs to effectively reach diverse audiences. The Planning Culturally Relevant Programs series is available at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/topic_series_planning_culturally_relevant_programs. A Web-based staff development curriculum, Strengthening Programs to Reach Diverse Audiences, is also available at http://www.joe.org/joe/2004february/tt7.php [28 August 2012]..
In every community there are needs. A need is defined as a gap or difference between a current situation and the ideal or desired situation. In Extension, the needs assessment tool is used to identify what the gaps are, how to prioritize those gaps, and how to make decisions about which needs can be addressed through Extension education. Extension educators do an excellent job of developing and implementing programs to address key needs. When attempting to build programming in a diverse community, the Extension professional should also look at the assets of the community in question. Assets are defined as the strengths, skills, talents, and capabilities within a community that can be utilized to enhance that community's quality of life (Kretzmann & McKnight, 1993).
Needs vs. Assets (Beaulieu, 2002)
NEEDS |
ASSETS |
Focus on deficiencies |
Focus on strengths |
Result in fragmentation of responses to local deficiencies |
Build relationships among people, groups, and organizations. |
Make people consumers of services; builds dependence on services |
Identify ways that people can give of their talents |
Give residents little voice in deciding how to address local concerns |
Empower people to be an integral part of the solution to community problems and issues |
One model that is used for community development is the asset model. The asset model recognizes that even in the most disadvantaged neighborhood there are individuals and organizations with both talents and abilities. Extension programming must identify and connect these abilities and skills. Oftentimes the assets of a community are just waiting to be tapped and maximized in an effort to make both the community and its members better-off. Examples of the differences between needs and assets are shown in Table 1.
Asset mapping focuses on identifying, recording, and charting the skills, talents, interests, and resources already present in a community. Asset mapping helps build on the positive resources already established in the community and can be as simple as asking people questions verbally or as in depth as using surveys.
We will explore three types of assets: individual, community organizations, and formal institutions.
Individual asset assessment is based on the following premises (Beaulieu, 2002, p. 5):
Everyone has talents, skills, and gifts relevant to community activities.
Each time a person uses his/her talents, the community is stronger and the person is more empowered.
Strong communities value and use the skills that members possess.
Such an approach contributes to the development of the community.
According to Beaulieu (2002), when identifying individual assets, you should explore several areas.
First, ask people for a list of their knowledge and abilities. Have the individual list skills learned at home and in the community. Then work with the individual to identify which of those skills are the most valuable or needed in the community. Embrace these skills as the very foundation of community building.
Second, look at community skills. You need to identify types of community activities that an individual has participated in, and then you need to find out what kind of community work the individual would be willing to do in the future.
Third is the area of enterprising interests and experiences. Individuals are allowed to identify skills that could be used to launch small businesses and skills that may be used in a trade or vocation.
In assessing individual assets, the Extension professional will reap benefits for developing programs that target audiences will enjoy and find valuable. The community members will benefit because they will be able to see the assets they possess and will understand how to use them. The community will benefit because the assets can be used to improve the community from within.
When used with community associations, groups, and organizations, the asset assessment is based on the idea that every community has people who work together to pursue common goals. These groups may be formal or informal and usually function by carrying out three key roles:
deciding to address an issue/problem of common interest;
developing a plan (formal or informal) to address the issue; and
carrying out the plan to resolve the problem.
Community organizations are critical to the success of Extension programming because they involve, empower, and affect local citizens.
As we look at formal institutions, the assets assessment process promotes the basic premise that every community has a variety of public, private, and not-for-profit formal institutions that carry out ongoing community functions so that the social needs of a community are met. There are five steps involved in assessing the assets of formal institutions:
Recognize that the local institutions represent important assets to the community.
Do an inventory of the institutions existing in the community.
Identify the type of activities in which these institutions are involved.
Explore the type of links that can be built between these institutions as well as between local individuals and informal organizations.
Seek the assistance of local institutions as conduits to resources outside the target community.
Some ways that formal institutions can help the community include purchasing locally, hiring locally, training local residents, developing human resources, sharing meeting space, initiating local investment strategies, mobilizing external resources, and sharing other resources. By understanding the assets of formal institutions, we can better understand how individuals and communities can come together to achieve a desired outcome.
The Extension professional must develop programs that will build on the assets of a diverse community. Once you have identified the assets of the community, you must take another look at how these assets can work together. If we review assets, we may see new ways for people and groups to work together. On the other hand, we may learn why groups have not been able to work together in the past.
While it is certainly important to assess the needs of a community, it is equally—if not more important—to tap into the assets of that community. By utilizing the identified assets of the community, as well as the individuals of that community and the community organizations, you will get the residents involved in building their community into a more cohesive group. The residents will feel that they have a stake in what is taking place. In other words, if you involve the community in programming, you empower the members by making them part of the solution. (For more information on asset mapping, please read Unit 4 of Strengthening Programs To Reach Diverse Audiences, http://www.joe.org/joe/2004february/tt7.php. [28 August 2012])
Beaulieu, L. J. (2002). Mapping the assets of your community: A key component for building local capacity. Mississippi State, MS: Southern Rural Development Center.
Guion, L. A., Goddard, H. W., Broadwater, G., Chattaraj, S., & Sullivan-Lytle, S. (2003). Strengthening programs to reach diverse audiences. Gainesville, FL: Florida Cooperative Extension, University of Florida.
Kretzmann, J. P., McKnight, J. L., and Puntenney, D. (1998). A guide to creating a neighborhood information exchange: Building communities by connecting local skills and knowledge. Chicago, IL: ACTA Publications.
Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University for Urban Affairs and Policy Research.
This document is FCS9225, one of a series of the Family Youth and Community Sciences Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date September 2005. Revised June 2010. Original written by Lisa A. Guion, former faculty member and Janet Harper Golden, former Extension agent, Pinellas County. Revised by David C. Diehl. Visit the EDIS Web site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
Lisa A. Guion, former faculty member, Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, Janet Harper Golden, former Extension Agent, Pinellas County; David C. Diehl, Assistant Professor, Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences; Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal
Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational
information and other services only to individuals and institutions
that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed,
color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital
status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations.
For more information on obtaining other extension publications,
contact your county Cooperative Extension service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service,
University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative
Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place,
Dean.