University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF
Publication #SL65

Charlotte County: Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides1

G.W. Hurt and T.A. Obreza2

RATINGS FOR CHARLOTTE COUNTY SOILS FOR PESTICIDE SELECTION

Resource soil scientists with the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service have rated the soils that are delineated by map units in the Charlotte County Soil Survey Report2 for their potential for leaching and runoff of pesticides. The rating criteria are given in a companion publication entitled "Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides for Water Quality Goals." These soil ratings have been developed to help pesticide users determine the potential for pesticides to be lost to groundwater or surface water bodies.

As explained in Circular 9591, factors that determine pesticide leaching ratings in soil are permeability and the occurrence of mucky layers in the upper 80 inches of the soil. Soils rated High have a high potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater, soils rated Medium have a medium potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater, and soils rated Low have a low potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater. Factors that determine pesticide runoff ratings from soils are hydrologic group, permeability, and slope. Soils rated High have a high potential for pesticide runoff, soils rated Medium have a medium potential for pesticide runoff, and soils rated Low have a low potential for pesticide runoff.

NOTE: The user may discover that one or more map unit names in Table 1 have been updated from names given in the legend of the soil survey report2. For example, a soil map unit may be listed in the survey report with a single soil series name, whereas the same soil map unit is shown as comprising two or more soil series in Table 1 (sequence numbers 1, 2, 3, ..) Where this occurs, the user should use the multi-named map unit given here, and make pesticide selections based on the most limiting condition to be found on the land in question. If necessary, the local Natural Resources Conservation Service office should be contacted to perform an on-site evaluation of the land in question.

REFERENCES

  • Henderson, W.G., Jr. 1984. Soil Survey of Charlotte County, Florida. USDA/NRCS in cooperation with University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Experiment Stations, Soil and Water Science Department and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

  • Obreza, T.A. and G.W. Hurt. 2006. Soil Ratings For Selecting Pesticides For Water Quality Goals, Circular 959, Soil and Water Science Department, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611. 5pp.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The development of this document was supported by the USDA/ES Water Quality Initiative Project # 89EWQI-1-9134.

Tables

Table 1. 

Soil Ratings for Charlotte County (see footnotes for explanations of column headings).

MUID

SEQ NUM

MUSYM

SOIL NAME

SOIL LEACH

SOIL RUNOFF

15002 1 2 CANAVERAL High Medium
15004 1 4 CANAVERAL High Medium
15004 2 4 URBAN LAND High Medium
15005 1 5 CAPTIVA High High
15006 1 6 HALLANDALE Medium High
15007 1 7 MATLACHA Medium Medium
15007 2 7 URBAN LAND Medium High
15008 1 8 HALLANDALE Medium High
15009 1 9 EAUGALLIE Low High
15010 1 10 POMPANO High High
15011 1 11 MYAKKA Medium High
15012 1 12 FELDA Medium High
15013 1 13 BOCA Low High
15014 1 14 VALKARIA High High
15015 1 15 ESTERO Low High
15016 1 16 PECKISH High High
15017 1 17 DAYTONA Low Low
15018 1 18 MATLACHA Low Medium
15019 1 19 GATOR Low High
15020 1 20 TERRA CEIA Low High
15022 1 22 BEACHES High High
15023 1 23 WULFERT Low High
15024 1 24 KESSON Low High
15025 1 25 ST. AUGUSTINE High Low
15025 2 25 URBAN LAND High High
15026 1 26 PINEDA Low High
15027 1 27 POMPANO Medium High
15028 1 28 IMMOKALEE Medium High
15029 1 29 PUNTA Medium High
15033 1 33 OLDSMAR Low High
15034 1 34 MALABAR Low High
15035 1 35 WABASSO Low High
15036 1 36 IMMOKALEE Medium High
15036 2 36 URBAN LAND Medium High
15037 1 37 SATELLITE High Low
15038 1 38 ISLES Medium High
15039 1 39 ISLES Medium High
15040 1 40 ANCLOTE High High
15041 1 41 VALKARIA High High
15042 1 42 WABASSO Low High
15043 1 43 SMYRNA Medium High
15044 1 44 MALABAR Low High
15045 1 45 COPELAND Medium High
15048 1 48 ST. AUGUSTINE High Medium
15049 1 49 FELDA Medium High
15050 1 50 OLDSMAR Low High
15051 1 51 FLORIDANA Low High
15053 1 53 MYAKKA Medium High
15055 1 55 COCOA High Low
15056 1 56 ISLES Medium High
15057 1 57 BOCA Low High
15059 1 59 URBAN LAND Medium High
15061 1 61 ORSINO High Low
15062 1 62 WINDER Low High
15063 1 63 MALABAR Low High
15064 1 64 HALLANDALE Medium High
15064 2 64 URBAN LAND Medium High
15066 1 66 CALOOSA Low Medium
15067 1 67 SMYRNA Medium High
15067 2 67 URBAN Medium High
15069 1 69 MATLACHA Medium Medium
15070 1 70 HEIGHTS Low High
15072 1 72 BRADENTON Low High
15073 1 73 PINEDA Low High
15074 1 74 BOCA Low High
15075 1 75 HALLANDALE High High
15076 1 76 ELECTRA Low Medium
15077 1 77 PINEDA Low High
15078 1 78 CHOBEE Low High
15079 1 7 WATER
Footnotes:
MUID = Natural Resources Conservation Service's map unit identifier.
SEQ NUM = Sequence Number, indicating a particular soil name among one or more names constituting a map unit name.
MUSYM = Map Unit Symbol from the soil map and legend in the Soil Survey of Charlotte County, Florida. Note that if a MUSYM appears more than once in this list it signifies that two or more soils are co-dominant in that map unit, and each such soil is rated separately here.
SOIL NAME = Name of soil or other landscape component (urban land, beaches, water, etc.).
SOIL LEACH = The rating of the soil for leaching of pesticides through the soil profile.
SOIL RUNOFF = The rating of the soil for runoff of pesticides from the soil surface.

NOTE: See "Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides for Water Quality Goals" (IFAS Extension Circular 959) for explanations of the criteria used to develop soil ratings presented in the right-hand four columns of this list.

Footnotes

1.

This document is SL65, a fact sheet of the Soil and Water Science Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. First published April 1991; revised September 2006. Reviewed June 2013. Please visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2.

G.W. Hurt, National Leader for Hydric Soils, Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA; T.A. Obreza, Professor, Soil and Water Science Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county's UF/IFAS Extension office.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.