University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF
Publication #SL112

Polk County: Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides1

G.W. Hurt and T.A. Obreza2

RATINGS FOR POLK COUNTY SOILS FOR PESTICIDE SELECTION

Resource soil scientists with the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service have rated the soils that are delineated by map units in the Polk County Soil Survey Report1 for their potential for leaching and runoff of pesticides. The rating criteria are given in a companion publication entitled "Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides for Water Quality Goals". These soil ratings have been developed to help pesticide users determine the potential for pesticides to be lost to groundwater or surface water bodies.

As explained in Circular 9592, factors that determine pesticide leaching ratings in soil are permeability and the occurrence of mucky layers in the upper 80 inches of the soil. Soils rated High have a high potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater, soils rated Medium have a medium potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater, and soils rated Low have a low potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater. Factors that determine pesticide runoff ratings from soils are hydrologic group, permeability, and slope. Soils rated High have a high potential for pesticide runoff, soils rated Medium have a medium potential for pesticide runoff, and soils rated Low have a low potential for pesticide runoff.

NOTE: The user may discover that one or more map unit names in Table 1 have been updated from names given in the legend of the soil survey report1. For example, a soil map unit may be listed in the survey report with a single soil series name, whereas the same soil map unit is shown as comprising two or more soil series in Table 1 (sequence numbers 1, 2, 3, ..) Where this occurs, the user should use the multi-named map unit given here, and make pesticide selections based on the most limiting condition to be found on the land in question. If necessary, the local Soil Conservation Service office should be contacted to perform an on-site evaluation of the land in question.

REFERENCES

  1. Ford, R.D., J.M. Robbins, Jr., J.T. Werner, D. Cowherd, C.N. Gordon, W.B. Warmack, M.M. Brown, K.W. Monroe, W.G. George, T. Sanders, and P.M. Basch. 1990. Soil Survey of Polk County,Florida. USDA/NRCS in cooperation with the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Experiment Stations, and Soil and Water Science Department, and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumers Services.

  2. Obreza, T.A. and G. W. Hurt. 2006. Soil Ratings For Selecting Pesticides For Water Quality Goals. Circular 959, Soil and Water Science Department, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611. 5pp.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The development of this document was supported by the USDA/ES Water Quality Initiative Project # 89EWQI-1-9134.

Tables

Table 1. 

Soil Ratings for Polk County (see footnotes for explanations of column headings).

MUID

SYS NUM

MUSYM

SOIL NAME

SOIL LEACH

SOIL RUNOFF

105002 1 2 APOPKA Medium Low
105003 1 3 CANDLER High Low
105004 1 4 CANDLER High Low
105005 1 5 EAUGALLIE Low High
105006 1 6 EATON Low High
105007 1 7 POMONA Low High
105008 1 8 HYDRAQUENTS Low High
105009 1 9 LYNNE Low High
105010 1 10 MALABAR Low High
105011 1 11 ARENTS Medium High
105012 1 12 NEILHURST High Low
105013 1 13 SAMSULA Low High
105014 1 14 SPARR Medium Medium
105015 1 15 TAVARES High Low
105016 1 16 URBAN LAND High High
105017 1 17 SMYRAN Medium High
105017 2 17 MYAKKA Medium High
105019 1 19 FLORIDANA Low High
105020 1 20 FORT MEADE High Low
105021 1 21 IMMOKALEE Medium High
105022 1 22 POMELLO Medium Medium
105023 1 23 ONA Medium High
105024 1 24 NITTAW Low High
105025 1 25 PLACID High High
105025 2 25 MYAKKA Medium High
105026 1 26 LOCHLOOSA Low Medium
105027 1 27 KENDRICK Low Low
105029 1 29 ST. LUCIE High Low
105030 1 30 POMONA High High
105031 1 31 ADAMSVILLE High Medium
105032 1 32 KALIGA Low High
105033 1 33 HOLOPAW Low High
105034 1 34 ANCLOTE Medium High
105035 1 35 HONTOON Low High
105036 1 36 BASINGER High High
105037 1 37 PLACID High High
105038 1 38 ELECTRA Low Medium
105039 1 39 ARENTS Low High
105040 1 40 WAUCHULA Low High
105041 1 41 ST. JOHNS Low High
105042 1 42 FELDA Medium High
105043 1 43 OLDSMAR Low High
105044 1 44 PAISLEY Low High
105046 1 46 ASTATULA High Low
105047 1 47 ZOLFO Medium Medium
105048 1 48 CHOBEE Low High
105049 1 49 ADAMSVILLE High Medium
105049 2 49 URBAN LAND High High
105050 1 50 CANDLER High Low
105050 2 50 URBAN LAND High High
105051 1 51 POMONA Low High
105051 2 51 URBAN LAND Low High
105053 1 53 MYAKKA Medium High
105053 2 53 IMMOKALEE Medium High
105053 3 53 URBAN LAND Medium High
105054 1 54 POMELLO Medium Medium
105054 2 54 URBAN LAND Medium High
105055 1 55 SPARR Medium Medium
105055 2 55 URBAN LAND Medium High
105057 1 57 HAPLAQUENTS Low High
105058 1 58 UDORTHENTS Medium High
105059 1 59 ARENTS High Medium
105059 2 59 URBAN LAND High High
105060 1 60 ARENTS High Medium
105061 1 61 ARENTS Low Low
105061 2 61 URBAN LAND Low High
105062 1 62 WABASSO Low High
105063 1 63 TAVARES High Low
105063 2 63 URBAN LAND High High
105064 1 64 NEILHURST High Low
105064 2 64 URBAN LAND High High
105066 2 66 FORT MEADE High Low
105066 2 66 URBAN LAND High High
105067 1 67 BRANDENTON Medium High
105068 1 68 ARENTS Medium High
105070 1 70 DUETTE Medium Low
105072 1 72 BRADENTON Low High
105072 2 72 FELDA Medium High
105072 3 72 CHOBEE Low High
105073 1 73 GYPSUM LAND Medium High
105074 1 74 NARCOOSSEE Medium Medium
105075 1 75 VALKARIA High High
105076 1 76 MILLHOPPER Low Low
105077 1 77 SATELLITE High Medium
105078 1 78 PAISLEY Low High
105080 1 80 CHOBEE Low High
105081 1 81 ST. AUGUSTINE Medium Medium
105082 1 82 FELDA Medium High
105083 1 83 ARCHBOLD High Low
105085 1 85 WINDER Low High
105086 1 86 FELDA Medium High
105087 1 87 BASINGER High High
Footnotes:
MUID = Natural Resources Conservation Service's map unit identifier.
SEQ NUM = Sequence Number, indicating a particular soil name among one or more names constituting a map unit name.
MUSYM = Map Unit Symbol from the soil map and legend in the Soil Survey of Alachua County, Florida. Note that if a MUSYM appears more than once in this list it signifies that two or more soils make up that map unit, and each such soil is rated separately here.
SOIL NAME = Name of soil or other landscape component (urban land, water).
SOIL LEACH = The rating of the soil for leaching of pesticides through the soil profile.
SOIL RUNOFF = The rating of the soil for runoff of pesticides from the soil surface profile.
NOTE: See "Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides for Water Quality Goals" (IFAS Extension Circular No. 959) for explanations of the criteria used to develop soil ratings presented in the right-hand four columns of this list.

Footnotes

1.

This document is SL106, a fact sheet of the Soil and Water Science Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Publication date: April 1991, Revised September 2006. Reviewed September 2009. Please visit the EDIS Web site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2.

G.W. Hurt, National Leader for Hydric Soils, Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA; T.A. Obreza, Professor, Soil and Water Science Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, Dean.