University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF 
Publication #SL174

Franklin County: Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides1

G.W. Hurt and T.A. Obreza2

Resource soil scientists with the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service have rated the soils that are delineated by map units in the Franklin County Soil Survey Report2 for their potential for leaching and runoff of pesticides. The rating criteria are given in a companion publication entitled "Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides for Water Quality Goals." These soil ratings have been developed to help pesticide users determine the potential for pesticides to be lost to groundwater or surface water bodies.

As explained in Circular 9591, factors that determine pesticide leaching ratings in soil are permeability and the occurrence of mucky layers in the upper 80 inches of the soil. Soils rated High have a high potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater, soils rated Medium have a medium potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater, and soils rated Low have a low potential for pesticides to leach to groundwater. Factors that determine pesticide runoff ratings from soils are hydrologic group, permeability, and slope. Soils rated High have a high potential for pesticide runoff, soils rated Medium have a medium potential for pesticide runoff, and soils rated Low have a low potential for pesticide runoff.

NOTE: The user may discover that one or more map unit names in Table 1 have been updated from names given in the legend of the soil survey report2. For example, a soil map unit may be listed in the survey report with a single soil series name, whereas the same soil map unit is shown as comprising two or more soil series in the list in Table 1 (sequence numbers 1, 2, 3, ...) Where this occurs, the user should use the multimap unit given here, and make pesticide selections based on the most limiting condition to be found on the land in question. If necessary, the local Natural Resources Conservation Service office should be contacted to perform an on-site evaluation of the land in question.

References

  1. Obreza, T.A. and G. W. Hurt. 2006. Soil Ratings For Selecting Pesticides For Water Quality Goals. Circular 959, Soil and Water Science Department, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611. 5pp.

  2. Sasser, L.D., K.L. Monroe, and J.N. Schuster. 1994. Soil Survey of Franklin County, Florida. USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Experiment Stations and Soil and Water Science Department. U.S. GPO, Washington, DC.

Tables

Table 1. 

Soil Ratings for Franklin County. (see footnotes for explanation of column headings)

MUID

SEQ NUM

MUSYM

SOIL NAME

SOIL LEACH

SOIL RUNOFF

37002

1

2

ALBANY

Medium

Medium

37003

1

3

BEACHES

High

Low

37004

1

4

DIREGO

Low

High

37004

2

4

BAYVI

Medium

High

37005

1

5

AQUENTS

High

High

37006

1

6

BLANTON

Medium

Low

37007

1

7

BOHICKET

Low

High

37007

2

7

TISONIA

Low

High

37008

1

8

RIDGEWOOD

High

Medium

37009

1

9

CHAIRES

Low

High

37010

1

10

COROLLA

High

Low

37011

1

11

DOROVAN

Low

High

37011

2

11

PAMLICO

Low

High

37012

1

12

LYNCHBURG

Medium

Medium

37013

1

13

HURRICANE

High

Medium

37014

1

14

HARBESON

Medium

High

37015

1

15

ORTEGA

High

Low

37016

1

16

BOBSAI

High

Medium

37017

1

17

KERSHAW

High

Low

37018

1

18

KERSHAW

High

Low

37019

1

19

KUREB

High

Low

37020

1

20

LYNN HAVEN

Medium

High

37021

1

21

LEEFIELD

Low

Medium

37022

1

22

LEON

Low

High

37023

1

23

MAUREPAS

Low

High

37024

1

24

MANDARIN

Medium

Medium

37025

1

25

CHOWAN

Low

High

37025

2

25

BRICKYARD

Low

High

37025

3

25

KENNER

Low

High

37026

1

26

DUCKSTON

High

Low

37027

1

27

PELHAM

Low

High

37028

1

28

PLUMMER

Low

High

37029

1

29

RESOTA

High

Low

37030

1

30

RUTLEGE

High

High

37031

1

31

RUTLEGE

High

High

37032

1

32

SAPELO

Low

High

37033

1

33

SCRANTON

High

High

37034

1

34

SURRENCY

Medium

High

37035

1

35

STILSON

Low

Medium

37036

1

36

PICKNEY

High

High

37036

2

36

PAMLICO

Low

High

37037

1

37

TOOLES

Low

High

37037

2

37

MEADOWBROOK

Medium

High

37038

1

38

MEADOWBROOK

Medium

High

37039

1

39

SCRANTON

High

High

37040

1

40

NEWHAN

High

Low

37040

2

40

COROLLA

High

Low

37041

1

41

PAMLICO

Low

High

37041

2

41

PICKNEY

High

High

37042

1

42

MEADOWBROOK

Medium

High

37042

2

42

MEGGETT

Low

High

37042

3

42

TOOLES

Low

Medium

37043

1

43

MEADOWBROOK

Medium

High

37044

1

44

TOOLES

Low

Medium

37045

1

45

WEHADKEE

Low

High

37045

2

45

MEGGETT

Low

High

37046

1

46

DUCKSTON

High

High

37046

2

46

RUTLEGE

High

High

37046

3

46

COROLLA

High

Low

37047

1

47

DUCKSTON

High

High

37047

2

47

BOHICKET

Low

High

37047

3

47

COROLLA

High

Low

37048

1

48

UDORTHENTS

Medium

Medium

37099

1

99

WATER

High

High

37100

1

100

WATER

High

High

Footnotes:

MUID = Natural Resources Conservation Service's map unit identifier.

SEQ NUM = Sequence Number, indicating a particular soil name among one or more names constituting a map unit name.

MUSYM = Map Unit Symbol from the soil map and legend in the Soil Survey of Martin County Area, Florida. Note that if a MUSYM appears more than once in this list it signifies that two or more soils are co-dominant in that map unit, and each such soil is rated separately here.

SOIL NAME = Name of soil or other landscape component (urban land, pits, beaches, water, etc.).

SOIL LEACH = The rating of the soil for leaching of pesticides through the soil profile.

SOIL RUNOFF = The rating of the soil for runoff of pesticides from the soil surface.

NOTE: See "Soil Ratings for Selecting Pesticides for Water Quality Goals" (IFAS Extension Circular 959) for explanations of the criteria used to develop soil ratings presented in the right-hand four columns of this list.

Footnotes

1.

This document is SL174, a fact sheet of the Soil and Water Science Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Published: August 2000. Revised: September 2006. Reviewed September 2009. Please visit the EDIS Web site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2.

G.W. Hurt, National Leader for Hydric Soils, Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA; T.A. Obreza, Professor, Soil and Water Science Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Millie Ferrer-Chancy, Interim Dean.