University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF
Publication #AN308

Cull Cow Beef Quality Issues: Injection Sites and Abscesses1

Amie Imler, Matt Hersom, Todd Thrift, Joel Yelich, and Max Irsik2

Injection Site Knots

Often cattle will develop a knot at the site of an injection (Figure 1). These knots are usually a result of the body’s immune system reacting to the health product that was administered. Injection site knots can occur with both subcutaneous and intramuscular injections; however, the degrees to which they pose problems to beef quality differ significantly depending on the route of administration. Injection site knots are considered a beef quality concern for several reasons.

Figure 1. 

Injection site knot on the neck; notice that the two injections were placed too close together.


Credit:

Todd Thrift, UF/IFAS


[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

If the health product is administered properly, these knots will often remain localized in the connective tissue directly under the skin—not within the muscle. In this case, injection site knots are more of a cosmetic or public perception issue until they are healed and absorbed by the body. However, if the product was administered intramuscularly, these knots can become an injection site lesion, which is a major beef quality issue.

USDA Suspect

Although there is no food safety concern associated with injection site knots, inspectors may apply additional scrutiny when they see cattle entering a harvest facility with injection site knots. Since it is obvious to the USDA inspector that these animals were most likely given an injection prior to coming to the harvest facility, these animals may be labeled as “USDA Suspect”. That USDA Suspect animal will be retained and checked by inspectors for possible residues before clearing it for human consumption. USDA Suspect cattle that are retained for testing pose both logistical and economic concerns for the beef packing industry.

Injection Site Lesions

Injection site lesions can occur after administering animal health products. Injection site lesions are often scar tissue that forms in the muscle or subcutaneous tissue following an injection. Packers will trim injection site lesions from the carcass, often trimming muscle tissue. There are three types of lesions that can form.

  1. Active Fluid-Filled—These are active sites of inflammation that are associated with an immunological reaction or an infection.

  2. Woody Callous—These blemishes are scar tissue that develop in the muscle as an active fluid-filled lesion heals. Woody callous lesions can persist in the muscle for months or years after the injection was given.

  3. Discoloration—These lesions appear as a “greening” in the original location where the product was administered. They develop while components from the injected product react with gases used in modern retail meat packaging. Discoloration appears after the meat has been placed in a modified-atmosphere package and shipped to the retail store, not during the harvest or fabrication process.

Quality Issues

Despite their differences in appearance, all injection site lesions pose beef quality issues and must be prevented. Consider the three following beef quality issues related to injection site lesions:

  1. Trim—Although the vast majority of injection site lesions do not pose a food safety risk, there is a trim loss when they are removed from the muscle tissue. Many consumers do not know what an injection site lesion is, so their presence can be a concern. To avoid these consumer concerns regarding beef quality and food safety, processors remove the entire lesion from the affected muscle, which can significantly devalue many high-dollar cuts.

  2. Decreased Palatability—Injection site lesions, especially the woody callous lesions, can impact palatability and consumer eating experiences considerably. Woody callous lesions are composed of connective tissue that can be very difficult to chew, which forces packers to trim the entire lesion from the muscle tissue. Even when the injection site lesion is completely trimmed from the muscle, tenderness of the surrounding tissue can also be negatively affected up to three or four inches from the lesion. Every time a consumer has a poor eating experience, they will become less likely to purchase beef again, and this has a tremendous impact on beef demand and the beef industry.

  3. Drug Residues and Food Safety—Active fluid-filled lesions carry the risk that they may still contain the animal health product that was administered. These lesions pose a food safety risk to consumers if they make it into the beef supply chain. As a result, all injection site lesions are trimmed from carcasses and these animals are held for residue testing before any product is released for retail sale.

Best Management Practices

Injection site knots are sometimes unavoidable; however, there are best management practices that cattle producers can use to minimize the impact of injection site lesions.

  1. Follow Label Directions—Only use the labeled route of administration.

  • No more than 10 cc per injection site. Some antibiotics require large doses for treatment. In such cases, cattle producers should divide the dosage into multiple injections in different locations to reduce the severity of knots that may form.

  • Administer the correct dosage. Never exceed the labeled dosage when vaccinating or treating an animal. Overdosing an animal does not make the product more effective or treat an animal’s illness faster. It often wastes product and increases the chance an injection site knot will form. More importantly, overdosing is illegal and will alter the withdrawal period for an animal health product.

2. Administer All Injections in the Neck—Because injection site knots cannot always be avoided, injections should NEVER be administered behind the shoulder. The neck is a region of lower product value and if a knot forms in the neck area, it will have minimal impact on meat quality. If a producer fails to follow Beef Quality Assurance guidelines and administers injections behind the shoulder injection site, knots and subsequent lesions can form in high-value cuts.

3. Keep Injection Sites and Equipment Clean—By practicing sanitary technique when administering injections, cattle producers can reduce the incidence of infection site lesions.

4. Tent the Skin (Figure 2) when administering subcutaneous injections.

Figure 2. 

Tenting the skin technique to appropriately administer a subcutaneous injection.


Credit:

http://www.extension.org


[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Abscesses and Abnormal Swelling

Abscesses and abnormal swelling, although commonly found on the hocks and rounds of animals, can be found in a variety of places, including the shoulder, knee, hock, and hip. These defects are most likely the result of some type of trauma, which can facilitate bacterial growth at the site of injury and cause an infection. In most cases the trauma can be attributed to one of three causes: (1) injury during transport, (2) improperly administered health products, or (3) chronic lameness that is usually associated with confinement conditions in the dairy industry. Abscesses and abnormal swelling are two beef quality problems for the industry.

Trim Loss

The tissue associated with an abscess may be infected; lean product from the affected area must be removed to ensure food safety.

USDA Suspect

Noticeable swelling and abscesses raise concerns for inspectors, who will hold these animals for residue testing. The first question an inspector is going to ask themselves when they see cattle with visible swelling is, “What caused this?” followed by, “Have they been treated with something?” and “How long ago were they treated?”

Best Management Practices

There are several ways cattle producers can reduce the presence of abscesses in their cattle.

  1. Improved Cattle Handling and Facility Design—Usually, abscesses are caused by some type of trauma that the animal incurs during handling or transport. By employing “cow sense” and a little patience cattle handlers can reduce the chance cattle will injure themselves or become bruised through improper handling. Additionally, cattle producers should check their facilities and trailers for anything that could cause an injury, especially sharp or protruding objects that can create a bruise or open wound.

  2. Improved Housing Conditions—Frequently, abnormal swelling (especially in the joints) can be due to confinement. Housing conditions that provide traction in high-traffic areas and the use of materials that increase cow comfort while in the milking parlor, bedding, and working areas can reduce abnormal swelling and the impact it has on beef quality.

  3. Treatment—Work with a licensed veterinarian to determine what, if any treatment options to implement.

Summary

Management of injection procedures and adequate training are valuable methods to eliminate injection site lesions and the associated concerns. Injection sites lesions are an issue that can be controlled almost entirely by the cattle producer. Likewise, proper handling procedures are important in order to minimize bruising and swelling that leads to suspect animals and de-valued carcasses. Attention to facilities and cattle handling procedures are means to mitigate and decrease the incidence of bruising that originates on the farm or ranch.

Footnotes

1.

This document is AN308, one of a series of the Department of Animal Sciences, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date October 2014. Reviewed October 2017. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. For more articles in the Cull Cow Beef Quality Issues series, go to http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/topic_series_cull_cow_beef_quality_issues.

2.

Amie Imler, former graduate research assistant, Department of Animal Sciences; Matt Hersom, associate professor, Department of Animal Sciences; Todd Thrift, associate professor, Department of Animal Sciences; Joel Yelich, former associate professor, Department of Animal Sciences; and Max Irsik, clinical assistant professor, College of Veterinary Medicine; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county's UF/IFAS Extension office.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.