University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF
Publication #WEC244

Ecological Engineers: Southeastern Pocket Gophers Are One of Nature's Architects1

Gabriel J. Miller, Steve A. Johnson, and Lora L. Smith2

What is Ecological Engineering?

Ecological engineering is defined as the creation, modification, and maintenance of environments by plants and animals. All organisms affect their environment in some small way, but ecological engineers make significant changes such as regulating the availability of essential resources (like food, water, and shelter) or altering natural processes (such as water flow). By modifying their habitats, ecological engineers also influence the occurrence of plants and animals in natural communities. Scientists recognize two types of ecological engineers: autogenic and allogenic.

Autogenic Engineers

Autogenic engineers provide or modify habitat through their presence or physical structure (these are typically plants). An example of an autogenic engineer is a Live Oak tree (Quercus virginiana, Fig. 1). Environmental conditions beneath the tree's limbs and leaves (i.e., its canopy) are different than conditions outside the tree's canopy. In summer, for example, light levels are typically lower and temperatures are cooler under the protective cover of the canopy than in areas beyond the canopy.

Figure 1. 

A Live Oak tree (Quercus virginiana) is an example of an autogenic engineer - its presence and physical structure provides and modifies habitat.


Credit: Gabriel J. Miller, University of Florida, 2007
[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Live Oaks also provide cavities, which serve as shelter or nesting sites for various animals. Cavities provide refuge to treefrogs, tree-dwelling lizards and snakes, birds, and mammals like opossums and squirrels. Certain plant species known as epiphytes (plants which grow on other plants), such as Spanish Moss (Tillandsia usneoides) and Resurrection Fern (Polypodium polypodioides), prefer the canopy of Live Oaks as their homes. Live Oaks produce acorns, a favored food of many game animals like deer and turkey. The presence and structure of live oaks provide numerous resources that other plants and animals rely on for their existence.

Allogenic Engineers

Allogenic engineers alter the environment through their activities. The American Beaver (Castor canadensis) is the traditional example of an allogenic engineer. These industrious mammals use trees and other vegetation to construct dams (Fig. 2). Beaver dams alter streams in several ways; decreasing water flow is the most noteworthy effect. Slow-moving water allows fine soil particles and organic matter (i.e. decaying plants) to settle to the bottom, enriching the water of the beaver pond.

Figure 2. 

The American Beaver (Castor canadensis) is an example of an allogenic engineer - its dam building activities alter the environment.


Credit: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Plant and animal communities in and around beaver impoundments change in response to water levels and flow as well as increased nutrients. Numerous species of animals, such as snakes, turtles, muskrats, and raccoons use beaver dams and dens as feeding and resting sites. Many plants and animals found in association with beaver dams are unable to exist without them. For example, some salamanders and frogs are unable to reproduce in fast-flowing streams and rely on beaver ponds in which to breed.

The Southeastern Pocket Gopher as an Ecological Engineer

An important allogenic ecological engineer in Florida is the Southeastern Pocket Gopher (Geomys pinetus, Fig. 3), also known as the "sandy-mounder" or "salamander." This rodent is found in southern Alabama, southern Georgia, and all but southern-most Florida (Fig. 4). Pocket Gophers live in dry, sandy uplands where they excavate extensive underground burrow systems. The most notable engineering activities of Pocket Gophers include soil tilling, tunnel construction (tunnels are a source of shelter for wildlife), and root herbivory.

Figure 3. 

The Southeastern Pocket Gopher (Geomys pinetus) is an important allogenic engineer in Florida.


Credit: Gabriel J. Miller, University of Florida, 2007
[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Figure 4. 

Range of the Southeastern Pocket Gopher (Geomys pinetus).


Credit: Monica E. McGarrity, University of Florida, 2008
[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Soil Tilling

Probably the most important habitat-altering activity of Pocket Gophers is soil mixing. Typically, soil particles settle into distinct layers or “horizons.” When gophers tunnel and build mounds (Fig. 5) they disrupt soil layering, they aerate the soil, and they cycle nutrients. Studies have found that natural areas with gopher activity have enhanced plant productivity and greater diversity than areas lacking this allogenic engineer.

Figure 5. 

The Southeastern Pocket Gopher (Geomys pinetus) tills the soil by digging tunnels and building mounds -- probably its most important habitat-altering activity.


Credit: Gabriel J. Miller, University of Florida, 2007
[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Tunnels as Shelter

Pocket gophers are known to excavate extensive tunnel systems (some greater than 500 ft. in length). Research suggests that gopher tunnels serve as an important shelter for a variety of animal species. Typical burrow inhabitants include many insects (some are exceptionally rare), salamanders, frogs, lizards, snakes, and small mammals.

Some species of beetles and camel crickets are very rare and exist only in burrows made by gophers. These insects have evolved with gophers and are entirely dependent on them for their survival. The Florida Pine Snake (Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus) is a large, impressive snake that shares habitat with the Southeastern Pocket Gopher. Pine snakes spend much of their time underground and prefer to use Pocket Gopher burrows as a place to hide and rest.

Root Herbivory

By feeding on plant roots, Pocket Gophers can drastically affect the local plant community. Some plants can tolerate root herbivory and even flourish, but others are adversely affected. For example, grasses are known for responding favorably to root herbivory, which may be why gophers and grasses coexist together. Little is known about the effects of root herbivory on most plants, but it is likely that the root herbivory of gophers influences plant communities.

Conservation Issues Affecting Southeastern Pocket Gophers

The Southeastern Pocket Gopher is reportedly declining in all three states, with the most notable losses in Alabama and Georgia. This decline is mainly due to land development activities of humans. Widespread residential and commercial development, industrial-scale agriculture, and extensive roads and highway systems are all major obstacles to the continued existence of Southeastern Pocket Gophers.

The decline of gophers does not just concern the rodents themselves, but also those species that depend on them as habitat engineers. As gophers decline, populations of rare insects, like camel crickets or scarab beetles, are in danger of becoming extinct. Despite their apparent importance as ecological engineers, gophers have not been offered protection by any state nor by the federal government. Furthermore, many land owners consider Pocket Gophers a nuisance because of their habit of tunneling in yards and golf courses. Despite these concerns, pocket gophers should to be tolerated, especially in their native upland habitats. To ensure survival of the Southeastern Pocket Gopher and the many species coexisting with it, tracts of upland pine habitat need to be protected and properly managed.

References

Huntly, N. and R. Inouye. 1988. Pocket gophers in ecosystems: patterns and mechanisms. Bioscience 38:786-793.

Jones, C. G., J. H. Lawton and M. Shachak. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373-386.

Mitsch, W. J. 1998. Ecological Engineering – the 7-year itch. Ecological Engineering 10:119-130.

Reichman, O. J. and E. W. Seabloom. 2002. The role of pocket gophers as subterranean ecosystem engineers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:44-49.

Skelley, P. E. and R. D. Gordon. 2001. Scarab beetles from pocket gopher burrows in the southeastern United States (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Insecta Mundi 15:77-93.

Footnotes

1.

This document is WEC244, of the Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, UF/IFAS Extension. First published April 2008. Revised February 2014. Please visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. For a better understanding of figures and graphics, please print in a color printer.

2.

Gabriel J. Miller, UF/IFAS, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Gainesville, FL 32611; Steve A. Johnson, associate professor and Extension specialist, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611; Lora L. Smith, Ph.D., associate scientist, Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center, Newton, GA.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county's UF/IFAS Extension office.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.