University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF
Publication #SS-AGR-185

Producing Peanuts Using Conservation Tillage1

D. L. Wright, B. L. Tillman, I. M. Small, and J. A. Ferrell2

Peanuts are a very important part of the row crop economy in Florida, which is the 3rd and sometimes the 2nd largest of the 10 peanut producing states in the US. While peanuts are a high management, high input crop and the costs of inputs have steadily increased, peanut farmers are competing in a global market and prices have remained low. Yields have increased to near 4000 lbs/A from 3200 lbs/acre mainly due to new varieties, although there has been advances in technology. To remain competitive, farmers must find ways to improve production efficiency or increase yields. Therefore, major trends in US agriculture over the past 10 years have included a move to genetically modified crops, reduced tillage, and precision application of inputs. Peanut production has traditionally been a tillage intensive operation, but conservation tillage (or strip-tillage, as it is known by producers in the southeast) has become a widely-accepted practice for most row crops and is gaining acceptance among peanut farmers.

The mid-to-late 1970s saw the first commercial production of strip-till soybeans and corn in Florida. No-till without subsoiling had not been successful because of the natural compacted soil layer of Coastal Plain soils preventing deep root growth, limiting rooting to the top 6–8 inches of soil. This restricted root system resulted in low yields when rainfall was inadequate or irrigation was not available or limited. There was also little planting equipment available to make strip tillage work, less equipment to control weeds, and fewer weed control options. Many of the equipment limitations and weed control options have been worked out over the last 25 years. Most conservation tillage planting units now include in-row subsoil shanks that break the soil compaction layer while leaving the row middle undisturbed. Beginning in 1995, transgenic or Roundup Ready soybeans and cotton came on the market, which allowed Roundup to be applied over the crop for weed control. In recent years, much of the corn crop is glyphosate tolerant. This has led to widespread adoption of strip-till planting of these crops, since weed control was no longer the major concern of strip-till farmers. Many of the new cotton growers or those expanding their acreage started farming all of their cotton using strip-tillage. Yet peanut farmers have been slow to move to conservation tillage, partially due to the belief that plant residue left on the soil surface causes increased disease problems on peanut or that digging will be harder. Growers had little incentive to change a program that had not only worked successfully for many years but often supported other parts of the farming operation. However, many studies over the past 25 years have shown that disease pressure is the same or less when planting into a cover crop, as compared to the plow/plant method of peanut production. This has also been the case with tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which is one of the most limiting diseases to peanut production in the southeast. Other factors such as fuel costs have led many growers to switch to conservation tillage. This situation, along with years of success planting corn, cotton, and soybean using conservation tillage techniques, has led to the spread of strip tillage production of peanuts. However, weed resistance has resulted in farmers needing to learn how to use herbicides with residual activity again for weed control. Fortunately, there are many good options for cotton, peanut and other row crops.

Getting Started

Implementing new farming practices creates new challenges and risks. Preparing fields a year in advance, land selection, crop rotation, type of cover crop, pest management, soil fertility, and type of equipment are all decisions that are necessary to ensure a successful crop. UF/IFAS Extension agents and Natural Resource Conservation Service personnel can help provide a management plan for successful conversion to strip-till production of peanut and can provide references to those who are already involved in strip-till production.

In spite of preplanning and talks with experienced strip-till farmers, weather is the biggest uncontrolled factor that puts the crop at risk. Irrigation can take some of the uncertainty out of the equation, but poor weather at harvest can still cause major crop losses. Although strip-tillage cannot overcome all of the stresses that weather might bring, strip-tillage can help reduce erosion and conserve moisture. Advantages associated with strip-tilling peanuts, besides moisture preservation, include less sandblasting and erosion, a reduction in labor, fuel, and equipment repairs; more time for management; and less TSWV and other diseases. The total benefit to using strip tillage for a 1,000-acre farm in Florida has been calculated to be $18,000 if yields are the same for both systems. Some of our strip-tillage/conventional tillage research with cotton has shown as much as a $75/A advantage to strip-tillage with yield increases where over-the-top herbicides can be used. Many farmers who have been in strip-till crop production for several years have said they would quit farming before going back to plowing and using conventional tillage practices.

There are many steps to follow to ensure successful production of strip-till peanuts. These are no different from any other crop using strip-till planting. Growing peanuts by any method should have a well-planned approach to production and marketing. After all of the equipment is in place, planning for strip tillage normally starts the previous year with selection of fertilizers, fields, and cover crops.

Fertilization

Direct fertilization of peanuts and soybeans is not as critical as for some crops and is not different for strip-tilled than for conventional-till peanuts. However, special attention should be paid to calcium (Ca), boron (B), and pH in either tillage system. More can be found on fertilization of peanuts at SS-AGR-74 Management and Cultural Practices for Peanuts (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/AA258). Research in Georgia has shown that lime should not be turned under before planting peanuts. Although pH adjustment will occur, it will have little or no effect on Ca uptake by pods. With strip tillage, lime should be applied well in advance of planting if the subsoil is very acid, or it should be incorporated prior to planting cover crops in the fall. Peanuts grow best at a pH of 6.2 or higher. Availability of soil nutrients and nitrogen fixation are optimized in this range. Zinc toxicities can occur when the pH is below 5.5. Manganese deficiency may occur when the pH is above 6.2. The liming program should be based on a soil test and dolomitic or calcitic limestone should be used to obtain the target pH range. Peanuts have a high Ca requirement and samples for soil tests should be from both the top 2–3 inches and 6 inches to ensure that adequate Ca is available in the pegging zone of strip-till peanuts. There should be at least 250 ppm of Ca and a 3:1 Ca:K ratio or higher for runner peanuts. All Virginia-type or large-seeded peanuts, or those grown for seed, should receive additional Ca regardless of soil test levels. Apply 200–500 lbs/A of dry gypsum at early bloom to meet this additional Ca need. It is much more critical to apply gypsum on non-irrigated peanut than irrigated as Ca moves to the pegs of peanut in soil water. Gypsum contains about 20% Ca and about 16% sulfur. Boron is critical to flowering, pod development, and nut quality. Usually a half pound of B is adequate to meet the needs of a peanut crop. This may be applied with preplant fertilizer or with an early fungicide application. Boron should be applied prior to early bloom, since it may interfere with pollination.

Peanuts are very good at using residual nutrients from the previous crop or cover crop. Seldom do peanuts respond to direct fertilization of phosphorus or potassium. Therefore, if peanuts are in rotation with crops that are fertilized adequately, no phosphorus or potassium will be needed.

Variety Selection

New runner-type peanut varieties are being introduced that have some resistance to TSWV, leaf spot, cylindrocladium black rot (CBR) and also have other unique oil and maturity characteristics. In variety trials across the southeast, no differences have been noted in variety response to tillage. Therefore, varieties should be chosen on the basis of yield, grade, and pest resistance, and then on the basis of the maturity that best fits the farming operation. Varieties range in maturity from about 125 days to almost 150 days with newest varieties being long season. Variety trials are conducted each year at multiple locations with results being published in EDIS fact sheets. Careful attention should be paid to those varieties that perform best in multiple years over a wide variety of management conditions.

Rotations and Cover Crops

Good rotations increase crop yields, reduce pests, and recycle nutrients. Grass crops benefit from nitrogen produced by previous legume crops, and peanuts usually do best after grass crops—especially after bahiagrass. Growers have always tilled up bahiagrass when planting peanuts in those fields. However, recent research has shown that peanuts can be strip tilled into bahiagrass if it is killed in the fall and cover crops planted over the winter (Table 1). If bahiagrass is killed in the spring, it should have some tillage to attain highest yields.

Table 1. 

Tillage influence on peanut yield in fall killed bahiagrass, either turned or striptilled (AL).

 

Yield lb/A

TSWV Incidence

White Mold

Turned Bahia

5,950 a

22.2 a

4.6 ab

Striptill Bahia

5,830 a

10.0 b

3.8 b

Turned Cotton

5,320 b

20.4 a

3.2 b

Striptill Cotton

5,160 b

10.2 b

6.6 a

LSD

271

7.7

2.6

Rotations also help growers plan labor needs for planting and harvesting. Not only do crops have different planting and maturity dates, but also different water requirements. Rotations decrease the risk of a total crop loss if severe drought occurs at a critical growth period for one crop but not for another. Much is known about rotating peanuts with grass crops. Crops like perennial grasses, corn, grain sorghum, millet, cotton, and small grains have been shown to benefit peanuts when they are planted as the preceding crop. Some of the benefits are use of residual fertility, less disease, and better weed control due to different modes of action of herbicides. If peanuts follow peanuts, leaf spot starts earlier and takes more fungicide for disease control than when peanuts follow one of the grass crops. Peanut root knot nematode and soilborne diseases such as stem rot (white mold) can become serious problems if peanuts follow peanuts. Initially, yields may not always be a great deal lower, but the expense of growing the crop will be higher due to the need for extra pest management. Figure 1 shows peanut plants grown in the greenhouse with the same soil type but with bahiagrass roots mixed in the soil with the plant on the right.

Figure 1. 

Greenhouse grown peanuts with bahiagrass roots mixed in the pot of soil (right) vs. none (left). Nodulation, root growth, and top growth were greater from plants with bahiagrass roots in the soil.


Credit:

UF/IFAS


[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Many growers begin to strip-till by planting into the previous crop's residue. They may do this because they are not accustomed to planting cover crops and/or do not know the value a good cover crop can contribute to the primary crop. However, plant residue can create problems if not managed properly or if equipment has not been set properly to cut through the residue. Strip tillage can be successful without a cover crop, but many of the benefits of a good mulch residue are not obtained. Some of the benefits of a good cover crop versus previous crop residue include:

  • less soil erosion;

  • increased moisture retention during periods of high rainfall;

  • increased organic matter when managed for high residue production;

  • reduction in sand blasting on the emerging crop;

  • higher levels of water infiltration;

  • higher microbial populations; and

  • can be used as winter grazing which further enhances microbial activity.

A good cover crop should be planned in much the same manner as the main crop. Small grain cover crops or perennial grasses are better at building organic matter than are legume cover crops. Legume cover crops have very little fiber in the plant tissue and decompose rapidly. They will release most of the N from the plant tissue in the first 30 days after being killed. Most legumes mature later in the spring than small grains and therefore have to be killed before much dry matter is produced. In addition, most legumes are susceptible to root knot nematode and may have similar diseases to peanut or soybean. Therefore, legumes are not recommended to plant prior to peanut production. Small grains (wheat, oats, rye) can be planted over a wide period of time on more infertile soils than many of the legumes. Small grain should be killed 4–5 weeks ahead of planting to keep from depleting soil moisture, to reduce cutworm, southern corn rootworm and other soil pests, and to reduce and minimize potential phytotoxic effects from the cover crop. Small grain cover crops planted in November can be top-dressed with about 30 lbs N/A of liquid nitrogen and 2,4-D in late January or early February. The application of 2,4-D will kill many of the winter broadleaf weeds and make the small grain cover crop and weeds easier to kill in late March when the small grain is headed out. Nitrogen will stimulate growth of the small grain for better cover. In cases where the cover crops are grazed, soil microbial populations are increased as well as the nutrients available to the following peanut crop. With 10 years of grazed vs. non-grazed cover crops, yields of peanuts have not been different but enhanced rooting has been noted after grazing; this enhanced root system may be valuable for non-irrigated crops or on soils that are less fertile. Generally other crops show a yield enhancement after grazing cover crops. Peanut seed germination may be slower with early planting in conservation tillage with heavy cover crops than in conventional tillage because of lower soil temperatures. However, pegging may be better because of cooler soils. Our data have shown that soil temperatures can be 25 degrees cooler on the soil surface with straw mulch as compared to bare soil between peanut rows on plowed fields during the summer month. Canopy temperatures have been measured to be 5 degrees cooler in strip till as compared to conventional tilled peanuts (96°F vs. 101°F). Likewise, available soil moisture was 30% higher during periods of hot, dry weather where the mulch was present. Bahiagrass or bermudagrass provide the best rotation crop for peanut because they result in a significant yield increase due to reduction of plant parasitic nematode populations, increasing organic matter and soil tilth, and grass roots that penetrate the compaction layer, leaving channels for the peanut roots to follow into the subsoil. Systems research is now showing that bahiagrass can economically be used in crop rotations with profits being double that of a continuous row crop system. The model can be found at http://nfrec.ifas.ufl.edu/programs/sod_rotation.shtml.

Planting and Management

Farmers who are considering strip tilling for the first time should talk to growers who have had experience with strip tillage so they can plan prior to the season—preferably the year before, when management of the cover crop can be taken into account. Since tillage operations are eliminated, the planting operation should be timely, but you need to be aware of problems that may occur controlling the cover crop or killing winter weeds or with some other practice. Some of the winter weeds can be very difficult to control in the growing crop if not controlled before planting. Glyphosate alone will not control several broadleaf weeds and therefore other herbicides need to be used in combination or in sequence along with residual herbicides to control glyphosate resistant weeds. After successfully killing the cover crop, 4–5 weeks are required for the weeds or cover crop to become brittle so that planting can be done with ease. However, those producers with livestock may allow grazing of the field up until a few days before planting, which will require a soil insecticide to control root feeding insects.

Proper adjustment of strip till equipment is essential to adequately prepare a seedbed and plant in the same pass. One of the main problems encountered by new growers is "blowout", where big patches of the cover crop will be pulled up, leaving a rough seedbed for the planter. The main cause of "blowout" is that the cutting coulter in front of the subsoil foot is not cutting deep enough and the subsoil foot pulls the plants out by the root, leaving an uneven planting surface. This can usually be overcome by lowering the depth of the front cutting coulters, causing the coulters of the strip-till rig to cut deeper into the cover crop. Generally, if the toolbar of the strip-till rig is level, this will not be a problem. Another cause of "blowout" is that the cover crop has not been killed far enough ahead of planting, and stems are still tough and the coulters cannot cut through the residue, causing dragging and poor seedbeds. This can be solved by relocating to another field that was killed earlier or making sure that you have 4–5 weeks between killing the cover crop and planting. Although it is normally easier to plant through completely green cover crops or those that have been killed within 4–5 weeks, green cover crops can harbor insects and can dry out the soil for the crop being planted. After a few years, the coulter on the strip-till rig will wear until it becomes too small to adequately cut through the cover crop and poor seedbeds may result in spite of all of the adjustments that are made. If this occurs, replace the cutting coulter with the largest one that can be mounted on the strip-till rig.

Data from Florida, Georgia, and Alabama with certain peanut varities have shown a yield advantage of about 0–500 lbs/A, as well as a reduction in tomato spotted wilt virus, with twin row peanuts as compared to single-row planting (Georgia 06G has not shown as high of a yield advantage to twin rows). Other advantages with twin rows include the lapping of row middles as much as two weeks earlier, which aids in weed control and gives higher grades, since peanut tends to put on more of a taproot crop and less of a limb crop. These factors result in more value for the grower. But can strip-till peanut be planted in twin rows? Yes, but it is a little more difficult, since both rows need to be planted over a single subsoil slot. Most strip-till rigs will tear up a strip through the cover crop about 8–10 inches wide. This is enough to allow twin rows to be planted on either side of the slot. However, it is often necessary to apply more down pressure on the planting coulters to make sure that seed depth can be sustained. Also, the sets of twin rows being plowed up with the same plow should be 36 inches to the outside of the twin rows. This may mean moving in the subsoil feet on those rows by 7 to 9 inches to ensure that the rows are planted on either side of the subsoil slot. However, in heavy residue, there is often straw that may interfere with planter operation, and seed are often left on the surface when planting through a thick mat of straw. Most planters can be equipped with row cleaners which will physically remove straw in front of the double disk of the planters. Even with these, plant populations are often slightly less in twin-row strip-tilled peanuts as compared to twin-row conventional-tilled planted peanuts, though yields are often similar. Six seed per foot of row is recommended in single rows and three seed in each of the double rows for the same seeding rate on an acre basis. A stand of 4 plants per foot of row is critical for those areas where tomato spotted wilt is a problem.

In-Season Management and Pest Control

Cover crops, insects, and weed management are the first problems encountered with strip-till peanuts. A good kill of the cover crop and weeds present before planting is essential to successful peanut production. If peanuts are given a competitive advantage early on, they will spread and lap sooner, making weed control less expensive and resulting in higher yields. Generally, weed control options in strip-till peanuts are the same as for those in conventional till systems. Refer to EDIS fact sheet SS-AGR-03 Weeds in the Sunshine: Weed Management in Peanuts (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/WG008) for a complete list of materials and weeds controlled. Cover crops are killed by herbicides prior to planting strip-till, and herbicides replace plowing in conventional tillage at a fraction of the cost. Some weeds like Florida pusley and palmer amaranth can be controlled with preemergence residual herbicides. However, if weeds escape from at plant applications, there are good options for weed control during the season provided that weeds are treated while small. Cultivation of peanut should be avoided during the growing season if weeds can be controlled by chemicals. If peanuts are planted into a high-residue cover crop, residue will decay during the growing season, leaving a mellow surface for peg penetration and good water infiltration. If there are weed escapes that cannot be chemically controlled, high-residue cultivators do a very good job of cutting weed roots while maintaining surface residue. Plowing depth of high-residue cultivators is slightly deeper than in conventional cultivation. Therefore, care must be taken to not prune peanut roots. With the wide array of herbicides on the market, farmers rarely plow peanuts after planting, and conventional tilled peanuts normally have the same weed control program as strip-tilled peanuts after planting.

Insect control in strip-tillage differs little from conventional tillage, except in a few instances. If peanuts are planted within a couple of weeks of killing the cover crop, cutworms can be more of a problem. However, if the cover crop is killed 4–5 weeks ahead of planting, cutworms offer no more problem than with conventional tillage. Lesser cornstalk borers prefer loose, dry, sandy soils and are less of a problem in strip till crops than with conventional tillage. Extended hot, dry conditions can lead to outbreaks of lesser corn stalk borer in all types of plantings, but damage will be less for strip-tilled peanuts than peanuts planted into tilled fields. Thrips numbers have been shown to be fewer in strip-tillage fields and therefore show a reduction in tomato spotted wilt. Strip-tillage is a factor in the TSWV Index developed by the University of Georgia and reviewed annually by scientists from the tri-state area. Reduced tillage is thought to increase the number and diversity of beneficial insects. However, insect problems are not the major consideration for growers in deciding whether to use strip-tillage on peanuts.

Disease and nematode control is usually no different for strip-tilled or conventionally tilled peanuts. As previously mentioned, strip-till peanuts consistently have less TSWV than do conventionally-tilled peanuts, and recent research in both Georgia and Florida show that severity of leaf spot is also reduced with strip-tillage. Control measures can be found in EDIS fact sheets ENY-002 Peanut Nematode Management (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/NG016) and PDMG-V1-10 Disease Management in Peanuts (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PG031). Rotation has much more influence on the number and frequency of fungicide applications than does tillage. There are several new peanut varieties that have more leaf spot resistance that may allow growers to reduce the number of fungicide applications, while making as good or better yields if proper rotations are used.

Harvesting

No difference in harvesting is noted between strip-tilled and conventionally tilled peanuts. Frequently asked questions by new strip-till peanut farmers are 1) will the residue from the previous crop interfere with digging and, 2) will there be more foreign material in the harvested peanuts? The answer to both is no. When peanuts are strip-tilled into cotton residue, stalks tend to decay slowly due to their high fiber content. However, with a cover crop on top of cotton stalks, no impediments to digging or harvesting have been noted due to rapid decay. Peanuts have been strip-till planted into bahiagrass that was killed in the fall, as well as in corn, sorghum, cotton, and soybean residue, without any problem during digging and harvest. Generally, if the strip-till rig will plant into the residue without any problems, the peanut plow will not have a problem in digging. Digging may be slower requiring the plow to be set slightly deeper when digging peanuts planted directly into bahaigrass. Dry weather can cause a problem in digging both strip-till and conventionally planted peanuts. Actively growing weeds in the crop at digging and weather conditions cause more problems for both strip till and conventional planted peanuts than at planting due to knocking nuts off vines.

Summary

The decision to strip-till plant peanuts can bring many benefits to the farming operation. These benefits include advantages to the soil; reduction in environmental impact; savings in fuel, labor, and equipment repairs; and ultimately more profit. Regardless of the method of planting, it is important to plan and evaluate each production step and to perform the operation in a precise and timely manner. Conservation compliance standards to further reduce environmental impact and to qualify for farm payments may make it more important to look at reduced tillage as a part of the farming operation.

Footnotes

1.

This document is SS-AGR-185, one of a series of the Agronomy Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date September 2002. Revised December 2016. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2.

D. L. Wright, professor; B. L. Tillman, assistant professor; I. M. Small, assistant professor; UF/IFAS North Florida Research and Education Center; and J.A. Ferrell, professor, Agronomy Department; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611.

The use of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information. UF/IFAS does not guarantee or warranty the products named, and references to them in this publication does not signify our approval to the exclusion of other products of suitable composition.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county's UF/IFAS Extension office.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.