
How well would your agricultural production facility meet the regulations of Florida's pesticide law? This article will assist agricultural producers in preparing for the day when the inspector arrives at their operation. It reviews the elements that an inspector for the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) Bureau of Compliance Monitoring (BCM) will examine during a routine agricultural establishment inspection.
FDACS' BCM is the state licensing agency in Florida for agricultural pesticide applicators who must be licensed to use EPA registered, restricted-use pesticides.
They perform routine inspections of facilities and operations of all types of private and commercial pesticide applicators, as well as of government agencies that are using pesticides. Inspections include a review of application records and an evaluation of product labels to ensure that use, storage, disposal and safety requirements of pesticides are being followed.
Inspections are necessary to ensure the safety of workers, to protect the environment and natural resources and to maintain the secure use and storage of agrichemicals.
A compliance inspection of an agricultural facility is very comprehensive. Besides completing all official documentation forms, inspectors may take photographs for future evidence. The inspector will cover the components included on the Pesticide Use Inspection report and the Worker Protection Standard (WPS) inspection form. Records pertaining to pesticide applications and Florida rules regarding pesticides should also be made available to inspectors. The following sections will discuss each component in greater detail with links to the individual inspection forms. A pdf of the entire set of inspection forms is also available (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/PI/PI19500FDACSInspectionForms.pdf)
Inspectors will properly introduce and identify themselves once they arrive at a place of business by presenting their BCM licenses and explaining the reason for the visit. They can arrive at any establishment without a prior appointment, so an establishment manager may already be engaged in some work activity. However, the inspection will go more smoothly with a manager's full cooperation
Following introductions, the inspector will fill out sections I and II on page 1 of the Pesticide Use Inspection Report for the agricultural establishments contact information (Figure 1 pdf).
During the early phase of the inspection, the inspector will determine whether restricted used pesticides are used on the establishment and verify that the appropriate license is held.
Ideally, storage would not be an issue if all products could be used within a single season. But, the reality for most Florida producers is that pest management is a year-round concern because of the nature of cropping systems and environmental conditions. The main check points the inspector will look for at the storage area are whether the facility appears to be secure, whether pesticides are held according to label directions, and what the overall condition of the facility is, each listed in section III (Figure 1). A secure storage area has a lock and is well-marked with signs (Figure 2).
Although not required by law, the inspector may make a few suggestions including:
having a spill kit on hand;
keeping an inventory list;
keeping liquid and dry materials apart;
not keeping personal protective equipment (PPE) inside with chemicals;
keeping all materials up, off of the floor; and
describing the benefits of Operation Cleansweep for pesticide waste disposal.
The spill kit contains items such as absorbent material and containment snakes to clean up liquid spills. More information about assembling and using a spill kit can be found in UF/IFAS EDIS document PI-159, Pesticide Spill Kits http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI196. An inventory list of the materials held in the facility will provide a record for the length of time they've been held. It's always a good idea to store dry and liquid materials apart. If a liquid spills on a dry material, both materials will have to be disposed of. All materials, regardless of formulation, should be stored up off the floor so that they are protected from water leakage and flooding..
Expired materials should have been disposed of safely. Operation Cleansweep is a publicly-funded disposal program that targets agricultural establishments. For more information, see UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-48, Operation Cleansweep for Pesticides http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI085.
After examining the products held in the storage facility, the inspector will select a label from one of the containers which will serve as the basis for the questions asked in section IV, page 2 of the Pesticide Use Inspection Report (Figure 3 pdf).
The information that the inspector will verify pertains to the following aspects of the product labeling:
labeled sites/crops for the application
proper rates, methods, and equipment used
pre-harvest intervals followed
whether supplemental labeling was on-hand, if needed
whether PPE was available and worn
whether restricted entry intervals (REIs) were observed where applicable
whether containers, rinsates, and excess pesticide have been properly disposed of
whether state specifically-regulated pesticides were used properly
any other specific restrictions that would apply
This particular section will also cover the condition of the mix/load/wash down site at the facility . The inspector will determine whether an anti-siphon device is installed in the plumbing used for filling tanks to hold diluted pesticides for application, or at least whether an air gap was present at the time of filling.
This is the point of the inspection when a manager will be asked to provide application records of restricted use pesticides. Records must be complete and must include these elements:
licensed applicators' names and license numbers
actual applicators' names if not the licensed applicators
date of application
start and end times of application
location and description of the treated site
target site or crop
total size of treated area
pesticide brand name
products EPA registration number
total amount of product applied
application method.
A sample form for recordkeeping is shown in Figure 4 (Figure 4 pdf). However, managers may choose to use software programs or any other recordkeeping system deemed appropriate for their establishment so long as the required elements are included.
When applicable, inspectors will also need to see records pertaining to Florida rules such as the Organo-Auxin herbicide rule (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/WG051) and the Aldicarb rule (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI111).
The inspector will conduct worker and handler interviews to verify the components of the WPS for establishments that employ workers outside immediate family. The following sections discuss the components of the WPS inspection.
The inspector will ask to see the central information display which must include the EPA-approved safety poster, emergency medical information, and pesticide application information. These points for inspection can be found on Page 1 of the WPS inspection form (Figure 5 pdf).
The display can be placed anywhere that is available to all workers on the establishment and is a convenient, visible place. Application information must be posted from the date of the application until 30 days following the product's REI. The elements required for this WPS central information display posting are designated by a “W” on the form listed in Figure 4. As with the restricted use record, there is no required format for the form so long as the necessary elements are present. An example of a central information display is provided (Figure 6). More detailed information is contained in UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-112, Worker Protection Standard: Information at a Central Location http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI149.
If workers and handlers are certified and licensed as restricted use pesticide applicators, they are considered trained. If not, training for handlers needs to be conducted before they participate in any pesticide handling task. If they are workers who don't handle any pesticides, they must be trained within their first 5 days on the job. Handling tasks include such activities as mixing/loading, repairing application equipment, making applications, adjusting tarps used during fumigations, and any task that involves direct contact with a pesticide. Some inspectors will suggest training everyone as handlers. A person who is trained as a handler can conduct training on the establishment. There are several approved methods of training, but most establishments use the EPA-approved WPS video which is available from FDACS by calling (386) 418-5525.
Documentation of training must be kept on file. Workers and handlers should sign a roster of the training including the date and method of training that was used. The inspector will ask for this documentation and will check the date that the training was conducted (Figure 5). Training must be done at least once every 5 years, should be a standard part of hiring a new employee and should be done immediately before assigning work. Based on FDACS inspection records, training concerns are the most common WPS violations in Florida. More detailed information is contained in UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-113, Worker Protection Standard: Training Workers and Handlers http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI150.
Commercial handlers are required to notify the establishment of application information before making the application (Figure 5). The purpose of this is so that the establishment owner can, in turn, notify his employees of the application. Likewise, if a commercial handler will be on the establishment and within ¼ mile of an area that is under a restricted entry interval (REI), then the owner should notify the commercial handler. More detailed information is contained in UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-115, Worker Protection Standard: Employer Information Exchange http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI152.
The inspector will ask the following regarding emergency assistance: “is prompt transportation to an emergency facility available for employees who become sick or injured by pesticides,” and “is information provided to medical personnel regarding the pesticide to which employees may have been exposed?” (Figure 5).
The inspector will check to see whether the necessary items for the decontamination site are present (Figure 7 pdf). Some decontamination sites are portable and can easily be transported from site to site where workers and handlers are present (Figure 8) Many establishments make portable kits containing the decontamination supplies and keep them on the equipment or vehicle that is near or used by workers (Figure 9). Decontamination supplies should be provided to workers entering treating areas until 30 days following the REI's expiration and they should also be provided for early entry workers during and after early entry. More detailed information is contained in UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-116, Worker Protection Standard: Decontamination Supplies http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI153.
Inspectors will inquire about workers in or around treated areas while an REI is in effect (Figure 7 and Figure 10 pdf). If there is early entry of workers into an area that is under an REI, the inspector will ask about the PPE that was worn, the applicator training, and time limitations. The necessary PPE can be found in the Agricultural Use Requirement box of each pesticide's label (Figure 11).
The inspector will ask questions about worker notification of pesticide applications of greenhouse and fumigant pesticides. (Figure 10). This information is pesticide-specific and is found in the Agricultural Use Requirement box of the product's label. If a greenhouse is being inspected, the inspector will specifically ask whether warning signs were posted. If a fumigant was used, the specific fumigant use sign should be posted (Figure 12). With most pesticides, however, only an oral warning is required. If posting signs are used, the inspector will ask when the signs were put into place and taken down. The WPS requires that signs for posting applications should be put in place 24 hours prior to the application and taken down within 3 days after the end of the REI. Failing to remove the signs is a common mistake. If an inspector notices workers in an area that is posted, they will assume that the workers are in an area that has been treated and is within an REI. Therefore, it is important to remove the signs as soon as the REI expires if workers will be within the site. More detailed information is contained in UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-107, Worker Protection Standard: Notice about Applications http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI144.
The inspector will ask if the person who handled the product was monitored visually or verbally at least once every 2 hours when handling a pesticide whose label contains the skull and crossbones symbol (Figure 13). If a fumigant is used in a greenhouse, the handler must have continuous visual or voice contact with another trained and PPE-equipped handler (Figure 10).
The inspector will ask about specific instructions for handlers (Figure 10). These questions will include verifying that a manager assures handlers read the label or are informed about the label requirements for safe use before performing any handling activity, that the handler has access to the product's labeling during handling activities, and that -- if a commercial handler is contracted -- the handler be informed of any treated areas, REIs, and entry restrictions on the establishment that may be within ¼ mile.
The inspector will interview handlers employed at an establishment and ask them (Figure 10):
whether they have been instructed in the safe operation of any handling equipment before it is used;
whether the equipment is inspected and repaired before each day of use; and
whether the employer assures that only trained and PPE-equipped handlers repair, clean, or adjust any handling equipment that contains pesticides or pesticide residues.
The inspector will ask (Figure 10):
whether the handler is provided with the appropriate PPE;
whether it is clean and good working order;
whether the applicator wears the PPE and uses it correctly;
whether filters are replaced on respirators when required;
whether there is a clean place to store PPE, put on, and remove PPE; and
whether the handler employer takes appropriate measures to prevent heat-related illness for handlers using PPE.
Owners of agricultural establishments and members of their immediate families are exempt from many WPS provisions; however, they must comply with these sections:
employer information exchange,
restrictions during applications,
restrictions during handling tasks, and
restrictions during REI's.
A checklist of these issues can be found in the final portion of the inspection sheet in Figure 10.
The inspection is not necessarily a one-way street for the inspector. Operators and employees have an opportunity to ask questions regarding the facility, pesticide laws, and making compliance more efficient in the operation. Because a major objective of the BCM is to serve an educational role, the inspection should be considered a two-way means of communication.
American Association of Poison Control Centers, Toxic Exposure Surveillance System, 1996. http://www.aapcc.org
Fishel, F.M. 2005. Operation cleansweep for pesticides. UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-48. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI085
Fishel, F.M. 2006. Restricted use pesticides. UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-36. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI073
Fishel, F.M. 2006. Worker Protection Standard: decontamination supplies. UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-116. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI153
Fishel, F.M. 2006. Worker Protection Standard: employer information exchange. UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-115. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI152
Fishel, F.M. 2006. Worker Protection Standard: information at a central location. UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-112. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI149
Fishel, F.M. 2006. Worker Protection Standard: notice about applications. UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-107. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI144
Fishel, F.M. 2006. Worker Protection Standard: training workers and handlers. UF/IFAS EDIS Document PI-113. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PI150
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Bureau of Compliance Monitoring. http://www.flaes.org/complimonitoring/index.html
This document is PI158, one of a series of the Agronomy Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date November 2007. Visit the EDIS Web Site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
Frederick M. Fishel, associate professor, Agronomy Department, and Director, Pesticide Information Office; Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal
Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational
information and other services only to individuals and institutions
that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed,
color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital
status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations.
For more information on obtaining other extension publications,
contact your county Cooperative Extension service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service,
University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative
Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Millie Ferrer-Chancy,
Interim Dean.