University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF
Publication #ENH841

Chilling Injury in Tropical Foliage Plants: I. Spathiphyllum1

Jianjun Chen, Luping Qu, R. J. Henny, Cynthia A. Robinson, Russell D. Caldwell, and Yingfeng Huang2

The genus Spathiphyllum, commonly known as Peace Lily, has about 36 species. Most species originate in Central and South America, but two have their native habitat in the Malay Archipelago. Because of their elegant white spathes, deep green foliage, and ability to tolerate low light, Peace Lily has become one of the most popular ornamental foliage plants (Chen et al., 2005).

Spathiphyllum, like most other foliage plants with tropical origin, is sensitive to chilling temperatures. A chilling temperature can be any temperature that is cold enough to cause injury but not cold enough to freeze the plant, usually ranging from just above 32°F to 59°F. Chilling injury has been a significant cause of losses in foliage plant production, transportation, and interiorscaping.

A general consensus among growers is that Spathiphyllum is relatively chilling resistant compared to other foliage plants such as Aglaonema. As a result, comparatively little attention has been given to maintaining appropriate greenhouse temperatures for this plant in winter and early spring. Also, limited information is available on how Spathiphyllum responds to chilling temperatures.

A systematic evaluation of foliage plants in response to chilling temperatures has recently been initiated in our program. Here is a summary of chilling responses of 15 Spathiphyllum cultivars with emphases on chilling injury symptoms and cultivar differences in chilling resistance (Qu et al., 2000).

Chilling Injury Symptoms

Chilling injury initiated from leaf tips and edges and progressed inwardly, with injured leaf areas becoming necrotic, then turning black, and, finally, drying up completely. Symptoms appeared within 24 hours for 'Mini' and 5 days for '5598' after initial exposure to 38°F. Degree of the visual injury ranged from minor necrotic lesions on leaf tips or edges to the complete death of plants, depending on cultivars, when exposed to 38°F.

In general, mature leaves were more sensitive to chilling than young leaves. Prolonged exposure to either 38°F or 45°F caused more injury than a shorter period of exposure at these temperatures, and injury was more pronounced at 38°F than at 45°F. Therefore, chilling injury can be lessened if preventative actions are taken to reduce either the severity or the duration of chilling, or both, during production.

No visual injury occurred in plants exposed to 52°F. However, when growth indices (Growth index = [(canopy's widest width + width perpendicular) ÷ 2] x plant height) were measured 45 days after chilling, they were found to be smaller than those of the controls (Table 1), suggesting that plant growth was actually affected by chilling exposure. This could explain why some cultivars recover slowly in spring even when temperature becomes optimal and nutrient supply is adequate.

Table 1. 

Growth index of eight Spathiphyllum cultivars 45 days after exposure to 52°F for 5 or 10 days in contrast to that of control plants.

 

Days Being Chilled

Cultivar

0y

5

10

5598

370.5

223.8

200.2

Annette

283.1

227.8

181.7

Debbie

276.3

249.9

200.6

Viscount

350.6

301.9

181.5

Little Angel

265.5

215.3

199.5

Connie

502.9

332.9

308.5

Lynise

474.8

424.9

387.1

Mini

379.8

194.5

202.3

zGrowth index (cm2)=[(plant width 1 + plant width 2) ÷2] x plant height.

yControl plants grown in a shaded greenhouse with a temperative range of 18°C to 32°C (64.4°F to 89.6°F).

Compared to Aglaonema cultivars, which are often visibly injured at 50°F, Spathiphyllum cultivars indeed appear to be more resistant to chilling temperatures. Growers, however, should be particularly aware of the invisible effect of chilling in Spathiphyllum, which may be wrongly diagnosed as insufficient fertilization or other culture practices.

Cultivar Differences in Chilling Resistance

Distinct chilling resistance exists among Spathiphyllum cultivars with leaf area injury ranging from 2.5% to 100%. Based on the percentage of injured leaf areas, resistant cultivars are '5598', 'Annette', '0597-3', and 'Debbie'; moderately resistant: 'Viscount' and 'Classic Viscount'; intermediately resistant: 'Little Angel', 'Petite', and 'Connie'; sensitive: 'Vicki Lynn', 'Starlight', and 'Lynise'; and highly sensitive: 'Mini', 'UF576-14', and 'UF474-1' (Table 2).

Table 2. 

Classification of chilling responses of 15 Spathiphyllum cultivars based on the percentage of injured leaf area three days after exposure to 38°F for five days.

Cultivar

% injured leaf area

Classification of chilling resistance

5598

2.5

Resistant

Annette

3.0

 

0597-3

6.1

 

Debbie

9.0

 

Viscount

16.0

Moderately

Classic Viscount

16.8

resistant

Little Angel

34.4

Intermediately

Petite

35.7

resistant

Connie

35.9

 

Vicki Lynn

56.7

Sensitive

Starlight

58.3

 

Lynise

60.2

 

Mini

95.5

Highly

UF576-14

100.0

sensitive

UF474-1

100.0

 

In summary, chilling injury in Spathiphyllum can be either visible or invisible. Visible injury ranging from necrotic lesions to complete plant death occurred when plants were exposed to 38°F or 45°F for 5 days. The reduction or delay in plant growth mainly reflects invisible injury when Spathiphyllum is exposed to 50°F. Cultivars differ significantly in resistance to chilling. Using resistant cultivars may reduce the chance of chilling injury in production and transport as well as decrease greenhouse heating costs.

Literature Cited

Chen, J., McConnell, D.B., Norman, D.J., and Henny, R.J. 2005. The foliage plant industry. Horticultural Reviews 31:45-110.

Qu, L., Chen, J., Henny, R.J., Caldwell, R.D., and Robinson, C.A. 2000. Response of Spathiphyllum cultivars to chilling temperatures. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 113:165-169.

Footnotes

1.

This document is ENH841, one of a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date August 2001. Revised June 2014. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2.

Jianjun Chen, professor, Plant Physiologist; Luping Qu, former postdoctoral research associate; R. J. Henny, professor, Plant Geneticist; Cynthia A. Robinson, former biological scientist; Russell D. Caldwell, former biological scientist; and Yingfeng Huang, visiting professor; Environmental Horticulture Department, UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611.

Authors appreciate Agri-Starts, Inc. and Twyford Plant Laboratories, Inc. for providing plant materials for this evaluation.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county's UF/IFAS Extension office.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.