University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF
Publication #FOR353

Diagnosis and Management of the Invasive Shot Hole Borers Euwallacea fornicatus, E. kuroshio, and E. perbrevis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)1

Demian F. Gomez, Jiri Hulcr, and Daniel Carrillo2

Introduction

Invasive species, those that are nonnative and cause economic damage, are one of the main threats to ecosystems around the world. Ambrosia beetles in the tribe Xyleborini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) are some of the most common invasive insects, representing half of the nonnative scolytines (bark and ambrosia beetles) established in the United States (Gomez et al. 2018a). Several biological features, such as mating with siblings (inbreeding), increase significantly the chances of successful establishment in new regions (Brockerhoff and Liebhold 2017).

Some of the most common invaders within the Xyleborini are the species previously known as the Euwallacea fornicatus species complex. The tea shot hole borer, Euwallacea perbrevis (Schedl 1951) (TSHB), is considered an important pest of tea in India and Sri Lanka (Danthanarayana 1968). This species was introduced into Florida in 2002, and since 2010, increasing damage has been recorded in avocado plantations and even more so on native species (Carrillo et al. 2012, Carrillo et al. 2016, Owens et al. 2018). In 2012, beetles matching the same morphology were introduced in Israel but were later found to be genetically different and named the polyphagous shot hole borer Euwallacea fornicatus (Eichhoff 1868) (PSHB) (Mendel et al. 2012, Stouthamer et al. 2017). The PSHB was recorded in 2003 in California reporting severe damage in 2012 to the avocado industry (Eskalen et al. 2012). In 2018, it was also reported in South Africa, causing significant damage to trees in urban and natural areas, including avocado orchards (Paap et al. 2018). Another species commonly known as the Kuroshio shot hole borer, Euwallacea kuroshio Gomez and Hulcr 2018 (KSHB), was also introduced in California and Mexico, causing severe damage to various native willows in riparian habitats (Boland 2016, García-Avila et al. 2016).

The taxonomic status of the E. fornicatus species complex was under discussion until recently. Based on morphological and molecular data, the existence of four species was revealed: E. fornicatior (Eggers 1923) (part of the TSHB, not found outside its native range), E. fornicatus (PSHB), E. perbrevis (part of the TSHB and the species in Florida), and E. kuroshio (KSHB) (Stouthamer et al. 2017, Gomez et al. 2018b, Smith et al. 2019). Currently, severe economic impacts have been increasingly reported for all the invasive shot hole borers in South Africa, California, Israel, and throughout Asia. The name E. whitfordiodendrus was recently applied to PSHB but was shown to be a synonym (Smith et al. 2019).

Distribution

All four species are native to southeastern Asia (Smith et al. 2019). In the United States, Euwallacea perbrevis has been introduced into Florida and Hawaii, whereas E. fornicatus and E. kuroshio have been introduced into California.

Euwallacea fornicatus is considered to be native in China, Japan, Malaysia, Samoa, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam, and introduced into Israel, South Africa, and the United States (California). Euwallacea kuroshio is native in Indonesia, Japan, and Taiwan, and introduced into Mexico and the United States (California). Euwallacea perbrevis is considered to be native in American Samoa, Australia, China, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Réunion, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Timor Leste, and Vietnam, and introduced into the United States (Florida and Hawaii).

Description and Diagnosis

The genus Euwallacea can be usually distinguished from other Xyleborini by the dark color, the small and robust body, and the posterior edge of the elytra, which is more flattened, extended sideways, and has a sharp ridge (Gomez et al. 2018a).

The three species have small differences in a few morphological characters, mostly different body proportions and size (Figure 1). A recent exhaustive morphological analysis revealed differences in elytra length, pronotum length, and number of protibial socketed denticles, but with a considerable degree of overlap between the species (Gomez et al. 2018b). Therefore, DNA sequencing is required for definitive identification.

Figure 1. 

Dorsal view of Euwallacea perbrevis, E. fornicatus, and E. kuroshio. Bar corresponds to 1.0 mm.


Credit:

Demian F. Gomez, UF/IFAS


[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

The species complex includes the four species discussed herein. Morphological characters for species diagnosis are from Gomez et al. (2018a) and Smith et al. (2019). Many features are shared by E. fornicatus, E. kuroshio, and E. perbrevis. The eggs are white, partly translucent, and 0.3 mm long, hatching in four to six days. The larvae are white with a reddish head, have a C-shaped body, and are legless. The larval stage is complete in 16–18 days. Pupae are white and have the same size as adult beetles, with beetles emerging after seven to nine days. Adult females have a body length of 2.3–2.8 mm, with a dark brown to almost black color. Segments 2 and 3 in the posterior face of the antennal are only partially visible. The pronotum is rounded anteriorly with several serrations. The punctures in the elytral are in defined rows. The elytral declivity is convex and gradually sloped, with a sharp edge in the posterolateral margin. Males are smaller, around 1.5 mm, with fused elytra, minute eyes, and non-functional wings. To identify individual species, comparative measures for the three species introduced in the United States can be used as described in Table 1. Elytra length and pronotum length are measured from base to apex in lateral view. Pronotum and elytral width are both measured at the widest point. Identification of ambrosia beetles can be difficult for non-specialists, and, therefore, we recommend consulting with a trained entomologist, such as the UF/IFAS Forest Entomology lab or the UF/IFAS Tropical Research and Education Center (TREC).

Biology

Most ambrosia beetle species attack only freshly dead or dying plants. However, a few species, including E. fornicatus, E. kuroshio, and E. perbrevis, colonize healthy trees and cause damage through mass accumulation (Hulcr and Stelinski 2017), where tree pathogens causing localized necrosis become a significant agent of damage when inoculated by a large number of beetles (Smith and Hulcr 2015). Adult females will usually disperse during the day, attacking hosts in a range of tens of meters (hundreds of feet), but they have the ability to travel 400 m (a quarter of a mile) (Owens et al. 2019). Females tend to colonize at the base of secondary branches, resulting in localized branch dieback. In avocado, for example, the initial infestation is characterized by white dripping fluid from the beetle entrance holes (Owens et al. 2019a). Females will typically make a divided or simple gallery encircling the stem, with a few longitudinal tunnels in small branches (Browne 1961). Eggs are laid in small clusters once the entrance tunnel has been completed. Like the rest of the ambrosia beetles, diploid females produce haploid male offspring from unfertilized eggs. Because there is no need to find mates, brother-sister mating increases the chances of colonization of new regions (Brockerhoff and Liebhold 2017), and therefore, one or a few individuals are sufficient to establish a new population (Hughes et al. 2017, Storer et al. 2017). The larvae, with typically three instars, feed entirely on symbiotic ambrosia fungi cultivated in longitudinal galleries of twigs and transverse galleries of thicker branches (Gadd 1941). Pupation takes place inside the same communal gallery. Newly emerged females stay in the galleries for several days where they are fertilized by the few brothers present. Once mating occurs, females leave the gallery through the original entrance hole (Browne 1961). Adults develop in 22 days at 24 ℃ (75 °F), producing 57 and 68 female adults in 6 weeks for E. fornicatus and E. perbrevis, respectively, 7% of which are males (Cooperband et al. 2016).

All three species, like the rest of the ambrosia beetles, feed on a cultivated fungus within the xylem of woody hosts (Batra 1967). They have specialized pocket-like structures called mycangia where they transport fungi to newly colonized trees (Batra 1963). The fungi are obligate symbionts of the beetles and serve as their source of nutrition, with severe pathogenic effects for some species. The symbiotic fungus invades the tree vascular tissue, causing cambial necrosis, sugar or gum exudates, branch dieback, and mortality of a broad range of tree hosts (Eskalen et al. 2013). The symbiotic fungus Fusarium euwallaceae is associated with E. fornicatus, causing branch dieback once introduced (Eskalen et al. 2012, Freeman et al. 2013). Carrillo et al. (2016) studied the fungal symbionts associated with Euwallacea perbrevis in Florida, where Fusarium sp. and Graphium sp. were the most common fungal partners recovered. More recently, Na et al. (2017) recovered two new pathogenic symbionts associated with E. kuroshio, Fusarium kuroshium, and Graphium kuroshium, highlighting the threat of E. fornicatus and E. kuroshio in California. The pathogenicity tests on healthy avocado plants showed that both fungus species are mildly pathogenic, with shorter lesion lengths for F. kuroshium when compared to those caused by F. euwallaceae. Despite being closely related species, E. fornicatus from Israel and California showed high rates of mortality when fed on the fungus carried by E. perbrevis (Freeman et al. 2012). Nevertheless, recent research suggests that fungal symbionts can be switched or shared in the genus Euwallacea (Kasson et al. 2013, O’Donnell et al. 2015, Dodge et al. 2017a).

Hosts

The three species treated herein pose a significant threat in their native and introduced ranges. Because the taxonomic identity of the species complex was recently reassessed, all host records, with a broad host range, should be understood as reported for the entire species complex. In the United States (California), the beetles were found on more than 200 hosts, though only 19 of these were shown as “reproductive” (supporting the reproduction of beetle colonies; Eskalen et al. 2013). Euwallacea perbrevis in Florida so far shows a narrower host range including avocado, mango, soursop, royal poinciana, swampbay, wild tamarind, and albizia (Carrillo et al. 2012; Owens et al. 2018). More recently, Gomez et al. (2019) updated the list to more than 400 species of plant hosts in 75 families, reporting 110 as breeding hosts. Interestingly, 95 of the plant hosts correspond to commercial timber species, and 43 are classified as relevant to the fruit industry.

Survey and Monitoring

Although ethanol is normally used as a lure in ambrosia beetle monitoring, it does not seem to attract any Euwallacea, as shown for E. perbrevis in Florida (Carrillo et al. 2015) and E. fornicatus and E. kuroshio in California (Dodge et al. 2017b). Two components, quercivorol (Carrillo et al. 2015, Dodge et al. 2017b) and ɑ-copaene, are attractants, with synergistic effects increasing captures when combined (Kendra et al. 2017). The combination of the compounds provides the best known detection system; results from Florida for E. perbrevis suggest a recommended trap spacing of approximately 30 m (100 ft) for surveillance programs (Owens et al. 2019a). Field life of the combination lure is 12 weeks (Owens et al 2019b).

Cooperband et al. (2017) suggested the existence of two pheromones, 2-heneicosanone and 2-tricosanone, for the three species present in North America. Pheromones have rarely been reported for ambrosia beetles within the Scolytinae with just a few known examples (Borden et al. 1976, Borden and Slater 1969, Francke and Heemann 1974); these are probably involved in social behavior inside galleries and the ecological and applied implications are yet to be tested.

Prevention and Control

Preventative strategies for homeowners and forest and agricultural managers include:

  • Keep trees as healthy as possible though proper silviculture/horticulture.

  • Avocado growers should periodically survey for trees showing branch dieback and signs of beetle attack at junctions of small and mid-size shaded branches showing the presence of white “sugar volcanoes.” Infested branches should be removed and destroyed (chipped, burned, or buried) to prevent further spread of these beetles (Figure 2). Chipping infested material should be to sizes smaller than 5 cm (Jones and Paine 2015).

  • Sanitation. Heavily infested trees need to be taken out and destroyed (chipped, burned, or covered by a tarp under direct sun for “solarization”). Solarization works best using polyethylene sheeting during high-temperature months, with ambient temperatures at least 35°C (95°F) (Jones & Paine 2015). Trees that are lightly infested often have a branch or two where most of the infestation is concentrated; those branches need to be pruned and destroyed, which has been an effective measure in avocado orchards in Israel and Florida.

  • Pheromone deployment may also be a viable control strategy, with push-pull strategies suggested to be more effective compared to mass-trapping alone (Byers et al. 2018). Quercivorol and ɑ-copaene can be used as attractants in white sticky traps separated by 30 m (100 ft), whereas verbenone can be used as a deterrent (Kendra et al. 2017, Owens et al. 2019). Contacting an Extension agent or a specialist for advice on installing traps is recommended.

  • Homeowners with high-value ornamental trees may consider protecting them before any infestation by injecting systemic insecticides. Preventative treatments with emamectin benzoate alone (systemic insecticide) or combined with propiconazole (systemic fungicide), reduced significantly the attack and colonization of E. fornicatus in California (Grosman et al. 2019). Injection into trees that are already infested typically does not work. Injection of systemic insecticides is currently not approved for avocado in the United States. Preventative insecticide sprays on bark surface work as well, but need to be reapplied frequently because the effect only lasts between 4 and 8 weeks. Bark penetrant should be used to assure an extended effect.

  • The “don’t move firewood” awareness campaigns can be successful in slowing the spread of the pest. Ideally, it should be connected with an enforceable quarantine. In Florida, movement of unprocessed wood is regulated by Rule Chapter 5B-65, which restricts both the import of the wood from outside of the state, and the movement of wood more than 50 miles within the state.

Figure 2. 

Signs of Euwallacea perbrevis infestations in avocado (south Florida, USA). A & B) Fresh “sugar volcanos” in junctions of small shaded branches. C) Entrance holes in a medium-size shaded branch.


Credit:

Daniel Carrillo, UF/IFAS


[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

References

Batra, L. R. 1963. Ecology of ambrosia fungi and their dissemination by beetles. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science (1903-) 66 (2): 213–236.

Batra, L. R. 1967. “Ambrosia fungi: a taxonomic revision, and nutritional studies of some species.” Mycologia 59 (6): 976–1017.

Boland, J. M. 2016. The devastating impact of an invasive ambrosia beetle on the riparian habitats of the Tijuana River Valley, California (No. e1964v1). PeerJ Preprints.

Borden, J. H., L. Chong, J. A. McLean, K. N. Slessor, and K. Mori. 1976. “Gnathotrichus sulcatus: synergistic response to enantiomers of the aggregation pheromone to sulcatol.” Science 192: 894–896 DOI 10.1126/science.1273573.

Borden, J. H., and C. E. Slater. 1969. “Sex pheromone of Trypodendron lineatum: production in the female hindgut-malpighian tubule region.” Annals of the Entomological Society of America 62: 454–455 DOI 10.1093/aesa/62.2.454.

Brockerhoff, E. G., and A. M. Liebhold. 2017. “Ecology of forest insect invasions.” Biological Invasions 19: 3141–3159.

Brockerhoff, E. G., A. M. Liebhold, and H. Jactel. 2006. “The ecology of forest insect invasions and advances in their management.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36 (2): 263–268.

Browne, F. G. 1961. The Biology of Malayan Scolytidae and Platypodidae. Malayan Forest Records. vol. 22 Government Press, Malaya.

Byers, J. A., Y. Maoz, D. Wakarchuk, D. Fefer, and A. Levi. 2018. “Inhibitory Effects of Semiochemicals on the Attraction of an Ambrosia Beetle Euwallacea nr. fornicatus to Quercivorol.” Journal of chemical ecology 44 (6): 565—575.

Carrillo, D., R. E. Duncan, and J. E. Peña. 2012. “Ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) that breed in avocado wood in Florida.” Florida Entomologist 95 (3): 573–579.

Carrillo, D., T. Narvaez, A. A. Cossé, R. Stouthamer, and M. Cooperband. 2015. “Attraction of Euwallacea nr. fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to lures containing quercivorol.” Florida Entomologist 98 (2): 780–782.

Carrillo, D., L. Cruz, P. Kendra, T. Narvaez, W. Montgomery, A. Monterroso, A., C. De Grave, and M. Cooperband. 2016. “Distribution, pest status and fungal associates of Euwallacea nr. fornicatus in Florida Avocado Groves.” Insects 7: 55.

Cooperband, M. F., R. Stouthamer, D. Carrillo, A. Eskalen, T. Thibault, A. A. Cossé, L. A. Castrillo, J. D. Vandenberg, and P. F. Rugman-Jones. 2016. “Biology of two members of the Euwallacea fornicatus species complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), recently invasive in the U.S.A., reared on an ambrosia beetle artificial diet.” Agric. For. Entomol. 18: 223–237.

Cooperband, M. F., A. A. Cossé, T. H. Jones, D. Carrillo, K. Cleary, I. Canlas, and R. Stouthamer. 2017. “Pheromones of three ambrosia beetles in the Euwallacea fornicatus species complex: ratios and preferences.” PeerJ 5 e3957.

Danthanarayana, W. 1968. “The distribution and host-range of the shot-hole borer (Xyleborus fornicatus Eichh.) of tea.” Tea Quarterly. 39: 61–69.

Dodge, C., J. Carrillo, A. Eskalen, and R. Stouthamer. 2017a. “Evidence for symbiont promiscuity in two invasive ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae: Euwallacea spp.)” pp. 165. In Annual Meeting of the Entomological Society of America, 5 November 2017, Denver, CO.

Dodge, C., J. Coolidge, M. Cooperband, A. Cossé, D. Carrillo, and R. Stouthamer. 2017b. “Quercivorol as a lure for the polyphagous and Kuroshio shot hole borers, Euwallacea spp. nr. fornicatus (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), vectors of Fusarium dieback.” PeerJ 5 e3656.

Eskalen, A., A. Gonzalez, D. H. Wang, M. Twizeyimana, J. S. Mayorquin, and S. C. Lynch. 2012. “First report of a Fusarium sp. and its vector tea shot hole borer (Euwallacea fornicatus) causing Fusarium dieback on avocado in California.” Plant Dis. 96: 1070–1070.

Eskalen, A., R. Stouthamer, S. C. Lynch, P. F. Rugman-Jones, M. Twizeyimana, A. Gonzalez, and T. Thibault. 2013. “Host Range of Fusarium Dieback and Its Ambrosia Beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) Vector in Southern California.” Plant Dis. 97: 938–951.

Francke, V. W., and V. Heemann. 1974. “Lockversuche bei Xyloterus domesticus L. und X. lineatus Oliv. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) mit 3-hydroxy-methylbutan-2-on.” Journal of Applied Entomology 75:67–72. DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1974.tb01827.x.

Freeman, S., M. Sharon, M. Maymon, Z. Mendel, A. Protasov, T. Aoki, A. Eskalen, and K. O’Donnell. 2013. “Fusarium euwallaceae sp. nov.—a symbiotic fungus of Euwallacea sp., an invasive ambrosia beetle in Israel and California.” Mycologia 105 (6): 1595–1606.

Gadd, C. H. 1941. “Observations on an attack by shot-hole borer on tea.” Tea Quarterly 14 (pt. 4).

García-Avila, C. D. J., F. J. Trujillo-Arriaga, J. A. López-Buenfil, R. González- Gómez, D. Carrillo, L. F. Cruz, I. Ruiz-Galván, A. Quezada-Salinas, and N. Acevedo-Reyes. 2016. “First report of Euwallacea nr. fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Mexico.” Florida Entomol. 99: 555–556.

Gomez, D. F., R. J. Rabaglia, K. E. O. Fairbanks, and J. Hulcr. 2018a. “North American Xyleborini north of Mexico: a review and key to genera and species (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae).” Zookeys 768: 19–68.

Gomez, D. F., J. Skelton, M. S. Steininger, R. Stouthamer, P. Rugman-jones, W. Sittichaya, R. J. Rabaglia, and J. Hulcr. 2018b. “Species Delineation Within the Euwallacea fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Complex Revealed by Morphometric and Phylogenetic Analyses.” Insect Syst. Divers. 2: 1–11.

Gomez, D. F., W. Lin, L. Gao, and Y. Li. 2019. “New host plant records for the Euwallacea fornicatus (Eichhoff) species complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) across its natural and introduced distribution.” J. Asia. Pac. Entomol. 22: 338–340.

Grosman, D. M., A. Eskalen, and C. Brownie. 2019. “Evaluation of Emamectin Benzoate and Propiconazole for Management of a New Invasive Shot Hole Borer (Euwallacea nr. fornicatus, Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Symbiotic Fungi in California Sycamores.” J. Econ. Entomol. 1–7.

Hughes, M. A., J. J. Riggins, F. H. Koch, A. I. Cognato, C. Anderson, J. P. Formby, T. J. Dreaden, R. C. Ploetz, and J. A. Smith. 2017. “No rest for the laurels: symbiotic invaders cause unprecedented damage to southern USA forests.” Biological Invasions 19 (7): 2143–2157.

Jones, M. E., and T. D. Paine. 2015. “Effect of chipping and solarization on emergence and boring activity of a recently introduced ambrosia beetle (Euwallacea sp., Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in southern California.” Journal of Economic Entomology 108 (4): 1852–1859.

Kasson, M. T., K. O. Donnell, A. P. Rooney, S. Sink, R. C. Ploetz, J. N. Ploetz, J. L. Konkol, D. Carrillo, S. Freeman, Z. Mendel, et al. 2013. “An inordinate fondness for Fusarium: phylogenetic diversity of fusaria cultivated by ambrosia beetles in the genus Euwallacea on avocado and other plant hosts.” Fungal Genet. Biol. 56: 147–157.

Kendra, P. E., D. Owens, W. S. Montgomery, T. I. Narvaez, G. R. Bauchan, E. Q. Schnell, N. Tabanca, and D. Carrillo. 2017. “a-Copaene is an attractant, synergistic with quercivorol, for improved detection of Euwallacea nr. fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae).” PLoS One, 12, e0179416.

Mendel, Z., A. Protasov, M. Sharon, A. Zveibil, S. Ben Yehuda, K. O’Donnell, R. Rabaglia, M. Wysoki, and S. Freeman. 2012. “An Asian ambrosia beetle Euwallacea fornicatus and its novel symbiotic fungus Fusarium sp. pose a serious threat to the Israeli avocado industry.” Phytoparasitica 40: 235–238.

Na, F., J. D. Carrillo, J. S. Mayorquin, C. Ndinga-Muniania, J. E. Stajich, R. Stouthamer, Y.-T. Huang, Y.-T. Lin, C.-Y. Chen, and A. Eskalen. 2018. “Two novel fungal symbionts Fusarium kuroshium sp. nov. and Graphium kuroshium sp. nov. of Kuroshio shot hole borer (Euwallacea sp. nr. fornicatus) cause Fusarium dieback on woody host species in California.” Plant Disease PDIS-07.

O’Donnell, K., S. Sink, R. Libeskind-Hadas, J. Hulcr, M. T. Kasson, R. C. Ploetz, J. L. Konkol, J. N. Ploetz, D. Carrillo, A. Campbell, et al. 2015. “Discordant phylogenies suggest repeated host shifts in the Fusarium-Euwallacea ambrosia beetle mutualism.” Fungal Genet. Biol. 82: 277–290.

Owens, D., L. F. Cruz, W. S. Montgomery, T. I. Narvaez, E. Q. Schnell, Tabanca, N., R. E. Duncan, D. Carillo, and P. E. Kendra. 2018. “Host range expansion and increasing damage potential of Euwallacea nr. fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Florida.” Florida Entomologist 101 (2): 229–236.

Owens, D., M. Seo, W. S. Montgomery, M. J. Rivera, L. L. Stelinski, and P. E. Kendra. 2019a. “Dispersal behaviour of Euwallacea nr. fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in avocado groves and estimation of lure sampling range.” Agricultural and Forest Entomology 21 (2): 199–208.

Owens, D., P. E. Kendra, N. Tabanca, T. I. Narvaez, W. S. Montgomery, E. Q. Schnell, and D. Carrillo. 2019b. “Quantitative analysis of contents and volatile emissions from α‑copaene and quercivorol lures, and longevity for attraction of Euwallacea nr. fornicatus in Florida.” Journal of Insect Science 92 (1): 237–252.

Paap, T., W. de Beer, D. Migliorini, W. J. Nel, and M. J. Wingfield. 2018. “The polyphagous shot hole borer (PSHB) and its fungal symbiont Fusarium euwallaceae: a new invasion in South Africa.” Australas. Plant Pathol. 47: 1–7.

Smith, S. M., and J. Hulcr. 2015. “Scolytus and other economically important bark and ambrosia beetles.” In: Vega F. E., Hofstetter R. W. (Eds) Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species. Elsevier Inc., San Diego, 495–532..

Smith, S. M., D. F. Gomez, R. A. Beaver, J. Hulcr, and A. I. Cognato. 2019. “Reassessment of the Species in the Euwallacea fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Complex after the Rediscovery of the ‘Lost’ Type Specimen.” Insects 10:1–11.

Storer, C., A. Payton, S. McDaniel, B. Jordal, and J. Hulcr. 2017. “Cryptic genetic variation in an inbreeding and cosmopolitan pest, Xylosandrus crassiusculus, revealed using dd RAD seq.” Ecology and evolution 7 (24): 10974–10986.

Stouthamer, R., P. Rugman‐Jones, P. Q. Thu, A. Eskalen, T. Thibault, J. Hulcr, L. J. Wang, B. H. Jordal, C. Y. Chen, M. Cooperband, et al. 2017. “Tracing the origin of a cryptic invader: phylogeography of the Euwallacea fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) species complex.” Agr. Forest Entomol. 19: 366–375.

Tables

Table 1. 

Table of measurements (mm) for the shot hole borers introduced in the United States: Euwallacea fornicatus, E. kuroshio, and E. perbrevis (modified from Smith et al. 2019).

Species

Total Length

Elytral Length

Pronotal Length

Elytral Width

Pronotal Width

Protibial Denticles

fornicatus

2.60−2.70

1.44–1.72

1.02–1.16

0.48–0.62

1.00–1.14

8–9

kuroshio

2.40−2.80

1.50–1.82

1.08–1.16

0.52–0.56

1.06–1.16

8−11

perbrevis

2.30−2.50

1.42–1.68

1.04–1.16

0.48–0.56

1.02–1.14

7−10

Footnotes

1.

This document is FOR353, one of a series of the School of Forest Resources and Conservation, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date October 2019. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu for the currently supported version of this publication.

2.

Demian F. Gomez, School of Forest Resources and Conservation; Jiri Hulcr, School of Forest Resources and Conservation and the Entomology and Nematology Department; and Daniel Carrillo, UF/IFAS Tropical Research and Education Center; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county's UF/IFAS Extension office.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.