MENU

AskIFAS Powered by EDIS

Control of Lantana in Pastures

Brent Sellers, Ed Jennings, and Jason Ferrell

Introduction

Lantana (Lantana camara) is a woody member of the Verbenaceae plant family that is native to the tropical Americas (Figure 1). This plant flowers abundantly throughout much of the growing season and was first introduced in many southern states as a perennial ornamental. Because of the plant's ornamental nature, many different flower colors exist, but the most common color combinations are red/yellow and purple/white (Figure 2). Lantana is now commonly found in naturalized populations throughout the southeastern United States from Florida to Texas. Lantana is currently one of the top 10 most troublesome weeds in Florida, with documented occurrences in 58 of 67 counties (USDA, NRCS 2012). Although it is still sold as an ornamental, commercial varieties are sterile and considered to be non-invasive.

 

Figure 1. Lantana camara growing in pasture.
Figure 1.  Lantana camara growing in pasture.
Credit: Jason Ferrell, UF/IFAS

 

 

Figure 2. Lantana flowers of (A) purple/white and (B) red/yellow are common.
Figure 2.  Lantana flowers of (A) purple/white and (B) red/yellow are common.
Credit: Jason Ferrell, UF/IFAS

 

Lantana can quickly invade disturbed sites (such as renovated citrus groves) by two different mechanisms, allelopathy and resistance to herbivory. Lantana produces allelochemicals (or plant toxins) in its roots and stems, and these allelochemicals have been shown to either slow the growth of other plants or totally remove them. Some of these same chemicals give lantana an acrid taste and deter insects or other animals from consuming the leaves. These leaf toxins are damaging to grazing animals. If animals consume the leaves, they often begin to show symptoms of skin peeling or cracking. Once animals show these symptoms, there is little or no treatment that can reverse the process. Although lantana's leaves are poisonous, its berries are not. Birds readily consume the fruit and disperse the seed.

Control

Several methods of mechanical and chemical control options have been tested in an attempt to control lantana, with varying levels of success. Mowing is not often effective because the perennial rootstock simply resprouts. Therefore, removing the entire root system is required for mechanical methods to be effective. Herbicides have been commonly used because of the time and labor required for mechanical control. Although many herbicides have been tested, few have provided reliable results. Triclopyr ester (Remedy Ultra, others) and 2,4-D have been tested extensively, but neither of these controls lantana. Glyphosate (Roundup, others) can be effective as a foliar spray, but high rates are required and will commonly result in significant grass damage around the plant.

Newer herbicides have also been tested to determine if they can provide lantana control without damaging desirable forage grasses (Table 1). During trials at UF/IFAS, we found that aminopyralid (Milestone) was not effective when applied alone or with 2,4-D (GrazonNext HL). However, fluroxypyr (CleanWave) will provide acceptable control if applied twice (a fall application followed by a spring application). Applying fluroxypyr only once will not provide sufficient control. The first application should be made in the fall 2–4 weeks before the first frost. The spring application should be made 2–4 weeks after full spring green-up (after the plant has fully recovered from winter dormancy, which usually occurs in late March through early May). Adding aminopyralid with fluroxypyr (then spraying in fall and spring) does improve control, but may not be cost-effective. Assess the severity of the lantana infestation before using an aminopyralid + fluroxypyr program.

 

Reference

USDA, NRCS. 2012. Plants Database: Lantana camara Plants Profile. Accessed February 23, 2012. http://plants.usda.gov/java/county?state_name=Florida&statefips=12&symbol=LACA2.

Tables

Table 1. 

Control of lantana with foliar broadcast herbicides. Applications were made in the fall (October) and spring (May).

Herbicide

Timing

Rate

2 MAT1

6 MAT

12 MAT

 

-----------% control-----------

Milestone

Fall

7 oz

10

0

0

Milestone

Fall + Spring

7 oz

15

12

20

GrazonNext HL

Fall

34 oz

5

5

9

GrazonNext HL

Fall + Spring

34 oz

70

65

35

Vista XRT/Flagstaff

Fall

23 oz

72

12

12

Vista XRT/Flagstaff

Fall + Spring

23 oz

92

93

80

Vista XRT/Flagstaff + Milestone

Fall

23 + 7 oz

92

5

10

Vista XRT/Flagstaff + Milestone

Fall + Spring

23 + 7 oz

95

97

93

1 MAT – Months after treatment. Indicates the number of months after the last herbicide application, whether it occurred in the fall or spring.

 

 

Publication #SS-AGR-359

Release Date:January 17, 2019

Reviewed At:April 7, 2022

Related Experts

Ferrell, Jason A.

Specialist/SSA/RSA

University of Florida

Jennings, Edward W.

County agent

University of Florida

Sellers, Brent A.

Specialist/SSA/RSA

University of Florida

Related Units

The use of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information. UF/IFAS does not guarantee or warranty the products named, and references to them in this publication do not signify our approval to the exclusion of other products of suitable composition.

All chemicals should be used in accordance with directions on the manufacturer's label.

Management

About this Publication

This document is SS-AGR-359, one of a series of the Agronomy Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date February 2012. Revised November 2018. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu for the currently supported version of this publication.

About the Authors

Brent Sellers, professor, Agronomy Department; Ed Jennings, Extension agent IV, UF/IFAS Extension Pasco County, and Jason Ferrell, professor, Agronomy Department, Range Cattle Research and Education Center; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611.

Contacts

  • Brent Sellers