University of FloridaSolutions for Your Life

Download PDF
Publication #HS1299

University of Florida Potato Variety Trial Spotlight: ‘Goldrush’1

Mario H. M. L. Andrade, Rodrick Z. Mwatuwa, Christian T. Christensen, Pam Solano, and Lincoln Zotarelli2

There are several potato varieties available in the market today. Most of them have been bred or developed in production regions other than Florida. The University of Florida Potato Variety Evaluation Program screens new germplasm from public and private breeding programs and identifies the most promising cultivars for commercial potential considering broad adaptability to Florida climate and conditions and market purpose: processing, fresh-market and specialty-type varieties. Over the years, the UF/IFAS Potato Variety Program has become an important reference to vegetable growers, seed producers, processors, crop insurance agencies, and brokers looking for alternative potato varieties to explore different markets, improved characteristics, and yield. This UF/IFAS Potato Variety Trials Spotlight presents a summary of the field evaluation of tuber yield and quality performance of the potato variety ‘Goldrush’ cultivated in Florida.

General Comments

‘Goldrush’ is a russet potato variety commonly grown for the fresh potato market, particularly for baking and boiling. It was selected from the progeny of a cross between ND450-3Russ and Lemhi Russet at North Dakota State University (Johansen et al. 1993). It was released in 1992 from the North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station. ‘Goldrush’ demonstrates high yield and good tuber characteristics compared to its commercial standard ‘Atlantic’. Tuber production and quality results provided in this spotlight are summarized from various trials conducted by the UF/IFAS Hastings Agricultural and Extension Center from 2005 to 2019, except 2012.

General Characteristics

‘Goldrush’ tubers have a brown skin with oblong to long shape and white flesh color (Figure 1). According to Florida rating codes for potato tuber characteristics (Table 1), the tubers have a good appearance with a moderate russet skin and intermediate to shallow eye depth. ‘Goldrush’ has demonstrated high yield potential under Florida production conditions (Tables 2 and 3). On average, marketable yield is 218 cwt/acre, approximately 6% below the commercial standard 'Red LaSoda', with 75% of the tubers produced found between classes A1 and A3 size distribution classes. It has a low to medium specific gravity of 1.061 (Table 2).

Figure 1. 

Typical tuber and internal flesh color of ‘Goldrush’ variety.


Credit:

Lincoln Zotarelli, UF/IFAS


[Click thumbnail to enlarge.]

Diseases

‘Goldrush’ demonstrates a slight susceptibility to corky ringspot and internal heat necrosis under Florida conditions (Table 3). It is resistant to common scab (Streptomyces scabies) and moderately resistant to Verticillium wilt (Verticillium albo-atrum and Verticillium dahliae), silver scurf (Helminthosporium solani), and blackspot bruising. ‘Goldrush’ is susceptible to most common potato viruses and other diseases such as mosaic, early blight (Alternaria solani), late blight (Phytophthora infestans), soft rot (Pectobacterium spp.), and fusarium dry rot (Fusarium spp.). The standard UF/IFAS Extension recommended disease and weed control program described under Potato Production (Chapter 14 of the Vegetable Production Handbook for Florida, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/cv131) should be followed.

Season Length and Growth

‘Goldrush’ is a medium-maturing cultivar under Florida growing conditions. Season length was 94 days on average from planting to harvest. This depended on weather conditions during the growing season. The plants should be harvested two to three weeks after vine kill to improve tuber maturation and skin set. Potatoes with proper skin set maintain better skin color, lose less weight in storage, and are more resistant to bruising and soft rot. For more information about vine killing on potatoes, see Potato Vine Killing or Desiccation (Zotarelli et al. 2016). Late in the season, tuber size should be checked regularly to harvest tubers with desirable, marketable size. Soil moisture should be managed late in the season to avoid high soil moisture conditions that cause enlarged lenticels and delayed skin set.

Fertilization

UF/IFAS trial plots are normally fertilized with 200 to 230 lb/A of N. The first application of 100 lb/A of N (granular) is typically incorporated in the bed prior to planting, followed by one or two side-dress fertilizer applications at emergence and/or at tuber initiation. Phosphorus and potassium applications follow the UF/IFAS guidelines described in Liu et al. (2019) and normally range between 45 to 100 lb/A of P2O5 and 170 to 235 lb/A of K2O.

Planting

A seed piece of 2.5 to 3 oz is recommended for planting. This variety should be planted with 40 inches between rows and 8 inches between plants, at 3 to 4 inches deep. A seed rate of 2,000 to 3,000 lb/acre of seed is expected.

Other Information

For additional information on cultivation and weed and disease management see the Potato Production chapter of the Vegetable Production Handbook, available at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/cv131.

References

David, D. 2020. Vegetable Cultivar Descriptions for North America. Cucurbit Breeding Program, Horticultural Science. Michigan State University. http://cucurbitbreeding.com/todd-wehner/publications/vegetable-cultivar-descriptions-for-north-america/potato/ Accessed on 23 April 2020.

Hutchinson, C. M., J. M. White, D. M. Gergela, P. A. Solano, K. G. Haynes, R. Wenrich, and C. S. Lippi. 2003. “Performance of chip processing potato varieties in northeastern Florida.” HortTechnology 13 (4): 706–711.

Johansen, R. H., B. L. Farnsworth, G. A. Secor, N. C. Gudmestad, and A. Thompson-Johns. 1993. “Goldrush: a new russet potato variety.” North Dakota Farm Research (USA). https://library.ndsu.edu/ir/bitstream/handle/10365/9617/farm_50_01_08.pdf?sequence=1 Accessed on 23 April 2020.

Liu, G., E. H. Simonne, K. T. Morgan, G. J. Hochmuth, S. Agehara, and R. Mylavarapu. 2019. Chapter 2. Fertilizer Management for Vegetable Production in Florida. In Vegetable Production Handbook for Florida, 2019–2020 Edition. CV296. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/cv296

Sisson, J. A., and G. ,A. Porter. 2002. “Performance evaluations of potato clones and varieties in the northeastern states-1999.” Maine Agr. For. Expt. Sta., Misc. Publ. 751.

The Potato Association of America. 2017. "‘Goldrush’ (Solanum tuberosum)." The Potato Association of America. https://www.potatoassociation.org/varieties/russet-potato-varieties/goldrush-solanum-tuberosum/. Accessed on 22 April 2020.

Zotarelli, L., S. Sargent, P. Dittmar, and M. Makani. 2016. Potato Vine Killing or Desiccation. HS181. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/hs181

Zotarelli, L., P. J. Dittmar, P. D. Roberts, J. Desaeger, B. Wells. and S. E. Webb. 2019. Chapter 14. Potato Production. In Vegetable Production Handbook for Florida, 2020–2021 Edition. HS733. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/cv131

Tables

Table 1. 

Florida’s rating codes for potato vine maturity and tuber characteristics at harvest.

Tuber Characteristics1

Rating

Code

Vine Maturity

Internal Flesh Color

Skin Color

Skin Texture

Tuber Shape

Eye Depth

Overall Appearance

1

dead

white

purple

partial russet

round

very deep

very poor

2

+-

cream

red

heavy russet

mostly round

--

--

3

yellow and dying

light yellow

pink

moderate russet

round to oblong

deep

poor

4

+-

medium yellow

dark brown

light russet

mostly oblong

--

--

5

moderately senesced

dark yellow

brown

netted

oblong

intermediate

fair

6

+-

pink

tan

slightly netted

oblong to long

--

--

7

starting to senesce

red

buff

moderately smooth

mostly long

shallow

good

8

+-

blue

white

smooth

long

--

--

9

green and vigorous

purple

cream

very smooth

cylindrical

very shallow

excellent

1 Adapted from Hutchinson et al. (2003) and Sisson and Porter (2002).

Table 2. 

Summary of production statistics and specific gravity of ‘Goldrush’ potato variety grown at the UF/IFAS Hastings Agricultural Extension Center, Hastings, FL from 2005 to 2019 excluding 2012.

Year

Total

Yield

(cwt/ac)

Marketable Yield

(cwt/ac)¹

% of Standard

Standard

Size Class (Distribution by class %)²

Range %

Specific Gravity

C

B

A1

A2

A3

A4

A1 to A3

Culls

2005

295

250

96%

Red LaSoda

2

13

69

14

2

0

85

1

1.067

2006

379

320

90%

Red LaSoda

1

12

72

13

3

0

87

3

1.067

2007

396

323

84%

Red LaSoda

2

13

74

8

3

0

85

4

1.059

2008

353

251

93%

Red LaSoda

2

24

58

16

0

0

74

4

1.069

2009

400

338

106%

Red LaSoda

2

12

80

6

0

0

86

3

1.056

2010

344

238

81%

Red LaSoda

5

23

67

5

0

0

72

5

1.063

2011

319

239

85%

Red LaSoda

3

16

77

4

0

0

80

7

1.069

2013

289

232

157%

Red LaSoda

2

13

69

11

4

0

85

4

1.058

2014

289

172

89%

Red LaSoda

5

32

57

5

1

0

63

6

1.055

2015

236

130

77%

Red LaSoda

8

28

63

1

0

0

64

17

1.060

2016

262

186

185%

Red LaSoda

3

21

71

4

1

0

76

7

1.067

2017

160

73

51%

Red LaSoda

13

39

49

0

0

0

49

6

1.051

2018

198

101

51%

Red LaSoda

13

35

48

3

2

0

52

2

1.056

2019

248

203

68%

Red LaSoda

4

11

57

26

2

0

85

4

1.063

Average

298

218

94%

 

5

21

65

8

1

0

75

5

1.061

¹Marketable yield: Sum of size classes A1 to A3.

²Size classes: C = 0.5 to 1.5 inches, B = 1.5 to 1 7/8 inches, A1 = 1 7/8 to 2.5 inches, A2 = 2.5 to 3.25 inches, A3 = 3.25 to 4 inches, A4 >4 inches; Size distribution by class: Class (wt)/(Total Yield [wt] – culls [wt])

Table 3. 

Yield, vine maturity, tuber characteristics, and internal tuber defects of ‘Goldrush’ potato variety grown at the UF/IFAS Hastings Agricultural Extension Center, Hastings, FL from 2005 to 2019, excluding 2012.

Year

Vine

Maturity

(Vine Kill)

Tuber Characteristics1

Internal Defects2

Internal Flesh Color

Skin Color

Skin Texture

Tuber Shape

Eye

Depth

Overall

Appearance

HH

BR

CRS

IHN

2005

7

2

5

2

5

8

7

0

0

0

0

2006

9

2

4

2

5

7

7

0

0

0

0

2007

6

1

4

2

6

7

7

0

0

0

0

2008

6

1

5

3

5

7

6

0

0

0

0

2009

4

2

5

3

4

5

6

0

0

0

0

2010

8

1

5

2

5

6

7

0

0

0

0

2011

3

*

*

*

*

*

6

0

0

28

8

2013

2

1

5

3

6

7

6

0

0

0

0

2014

6

1

5

2

5

6

6

0

0

3

1

2015

5

1

6

3

6

9

8

0

0

0

0

2016

6

1

5

3

6

7

7

0

0

0

1

2017

6

1

5

3

6

8

8

0

0

0

0

2018

4

1

5

3

6

8

8

0

0

0

0

2019

6

1

5

4

6

8

8

0

0

0

0

Average

6

1

5

3

6

7

7

0

0

2

1

1 See rating system outlined in Florida Rating Code Table (Table 1).

2 Percent tuber defects. HH = hollow heart, BR = brown rot, CRS = corky ring spot, IHN = internal heat necrosis.

*not available

Footnotes

1.

This document is HS1299, one of a series of the Horticultural Sciences Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date May 2017. Revised April 2020 and February 2021. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

2.

Mario H. M. L. Andrade, research scholar; Rodrick Z. Mwatuwa, research assistant; Christian T. Christensen, postdoctoral research associate; Pam Solano, biological scientist; and Lincoln Zotarelli, assistant professor; Horticultural Sciences Department, UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611.


The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county's UF/IFAS Extension office.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.