AskIFAS Powered by EDIS


Cost Estimates for Producing Sargassum spp. Compost

Trent Blare, Afeefa A. Abdool-Ghany, and Helena M. Solo-Gabriele


Sargassum spp.
Figure 1. Sargassum spp.
Credit: Afeefa A. Abdool-Ghany, UF/IFAS

Objective Statement

The objective of this study was to provide insights to municipalities and small businesses who are considering starting composting operations using Sargassum as a feedstock.


Sargassum spp. is one of the dominant forms of brown macroalgae (seaweed) found on beaches throughout Florida. The algae is pelagic—that is, free floating near the ocean surface—and naturally found floating in the ocean. When in mats in the ocean, it serves as habitat for fish and turtles and is protected. Accumulations of Sargassum spp. naturally wash up on the shores of Florida beaches. Sargassum spp. originates from two sources, the Sargasso Sea in the Northern Atlantic Ocean near Bermuda, and the great Atlantic Sargassum Belt (GASB). The growth of the large mats of Sargassum spp. is believed to be fueled by the global flow of nutrients with some pointing to the release of nutrients from the deforestation of the Amazon Fainforest as one cause for the sudden increase in Sargassum within the Caribbean (Wang et al. 2019). Recently, there have been large quantities of Sargassum spp. reported in the central Atlantic Ocean and the Caribbean Sea. During the summer of 2018 and 2019, record amounts of Sargassum spp. were documented along Florida beaches, resulting in local authorities hauling this seaweed to the nearest landfill (Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces 2021). Scientists believe that the amount of Sargassum spp. will increase as global temperatures continue to rise (United Nations 2020).

The Sargasso Sea, with its large mats of free-floating Sargassum spp., is a thriving ecosystem and provides a vital habit and food source for many marine species. Turtles use Sargassum spp. mats as a source of shelter and food since shrimp, crab, and fish are found in the floating algae. Sargassum spp. deposits on beaches are important in maintaining ecological balance. When excessive, however, the local ecology suffers and the aesthetics of the beach decline. In extreme conditions (when seaweed mats are too thick), turtles and dolphins are unable to surface and therefore drown (Atkin 2018). The thick mats also block sunlight from reaching seagrasses in shallow coastal waters. Once these thick mats make their way on shore, they begin to decompose and release hydrogen sulfide, which causes a foul odor (Atkin 2018; Langin 2018). Huge heaps of Sargassum spp. on the sand contribute to a decline in the aesthetic quality of Florida beaches and ultimately impact the tourism industry (CAST 2015). Sargassum spp. also attracts insects, such as sand flies, as it decomposes further degrading the aesthetic quality of beaches (Swinscoe et al. 2018).

One city in south Florida has successfully reduced the impacts from large amounts of Sargassum spp. on the beach by implementing a unique and sustainable practice of composting. Ft. Lauderdale, located in Broward County, has been composting Sargassum spp. for the past 15 years. They have fine-tuned the collection process to optimize beach ecology and aesthetics. It uses a beach raker pulled behind a tractor to first clean the beach (Figure 2, left and middle). The Sargassum spp. is then transported to a city park where it is dried and placed into a compost pile (Figure 2, right). Once dried, the Sargassum spp. is then passed through a shaker to remove any debris before it is used as compost by the city or given away to city residents.

Left, Sargassum spp. collection on Miami Beach, Florida with a surf rake; middle, Sargassum spp. collection at Key Biscayne; right, Sargassum spp. compost at the Ft. Lauderdale compost facility.
Figure 2. Left, Sargassum spp. collection on Miami Beach, Florida with a surf rake; middle, Sargassum spp. collection at Key Biscayne; right, Sargassum spp. compost at the Ft. Lauderdale compost facility.
Credit: Left: Trent Blare; middle and right: Afeefa A. Abdool-Ghany

This publication examines the costs that the city of Ft. Lauderdale incurred to establish their Sargassum compost facility. The objective of this analysis was to provide insights to municipalities and small businesses considering starting composting operations with the expectation that Sargassum composting will provide them with more space in their landfills while maintaining their beaches’ tourist appeal. The data for this analysis was collected through interviews in 2021 with several individuals in municipalities and small businesses, which use a wide range of Sargassum management strategies. This publication is intended only as a guide to estimate the financial aspects of starting and operating a Sargassum composting operation.

Main Assumptions


The cash overhead costs (e.g., insurance and taxes) of a Sargassum spp. composting operation were computed to be $200 per acre, based upon City of Ft. Lauderdale estimates. Non-cash overhead costs (e.g., land rent) are estimated to be about $500 per acre, estimated on the rental rate for farmland in southeast Florida (Blare et al. 2022). The cost to purchase farmland in Broward County is estimated to $3,360/acre (Land and Farm 2021). Thus, total fixed costs are estimated to be $700/acre. These values will change based on the location that is chosen for the Sargassum composting site.


Operational HoursThe time that the city employees dedicate to cleaning the Sargassum on the beach (using a tractor to pull the surf rake and an 8 yd3 truck) is 5 hours a day for a total of 1,825 hours per year (5 hours x 365 days). The bulldozer used to spread and turn the Sargassum at the composting site is used one hour a week or 4 hours a month.

Diesel Fuel CostsThe US Energy Information Administration (2021) estimated that the average cost of diesel from January 2021 to October 2021 was $3.20/gallon. Average fuel consumption (in gallons/hour) for farm tractors on a year-round basis without reference to any specific implement can also be estimated using the following equation (Edwards 2015):

0.044 x Maximum PTO horspower

We used this equation to estimate the average fuel consumption for the tractor, 8 yd3 truck, and a bulldozer. We estimated that the tractor gas tank size was 50.2 gallons with a PTO of 92 hp (Easterlund 2016). We estimated the tank size for the 8 yd3 truck to be 50 gallons with a gross horsepower of 300 (Ritchie Bros. 2018). The tank size for the bulldozer was assumed to be 69 gallons and net power of 130 horsepower (Caterpillar 2021). Once the fuel consumption was calculated, it was multiplied by the average price of diesel to get the per-hour fuel cost. Then, to determine the annual fuel cost, we multiplied the operational hours to per-hour fuel cost.

Equipment Costs Two 8 yd3 trucks are used by the city, but since half of the use was for Sargassum composting, while the other half was used for other projects around the city, one truck was used for the annual cost calculations. One bulldozer is used in the city to maintain the Sargassum pile for one hour a week. There are three tractors and surf rakes that are used in the collection of Sargassum off the beach. Three are used in case one breaks down and needs maintenance, or in case it’s a heavy season. At most, there can be a total of two tractors and surf rakes used at a time to clean the beach, which would require a total of two people to operate. One shaker is used only when the compost produced is needed for a project. It allows for a more uniform product and removes larger debris pieces. Table 1 breaks down the costs that are associated with the equipment used in the composting facility.

Maintenance CostsThe maintenance cost of the equipment in use is about 1% of the equipment cost (Edwards 2015).

Table 1. Equipment costs associated with a Sargassum composting facility.


Number of Units

Value of Equipment ($)

Useful Life (years)

Annual cost of Equipment ($)

Cost of Diesel ($/gal)

Average Diesel Fuel cost ($/hour)

Operation (hours)

Annual Fuel cost ($)

Maintenance Cost

(per unit)

Total maintenance cost ($)

Total Annual Cost ($)

\Surf rake a












Tractor b












8 yd3 truck c












Bulldozer d












Shaker e












N/A- information was not available or was not used to compute the final cost.

Cost of insurance for each piece of equipment was not included since the government institutions are self-insured.

a Surf rake is maintained 2 times a year.

b Tractor is maintained every 100 hours.

c 8 yd3 truck is maintained 3 times a year.

d Bulldozer is maintained 3 times a year.

e Shaker is maintained one time a year.



An employee earns an annual salary of $60,000. Employees collecting the Sargassum off the beach work from 6 AM to 11 AM, for a total of 5 hours each morning. As collection is done 7 days a week, a total of 35 hours a week are spent on Sargassum removal. There is one person who is tasked with maintaining the compost pile one day a week. They operate the bulldozer a maximum of one hour a week on the pile. Sargassum collection can be broken into peak (3 months/year or 12 weeks) and off-peak seasons (9 months/year or 36 weeks). Peak season for Sargassum takes place in May, June, and July, while off peak season takes place from January to April and August to December. When there is a modest to heavy amount of Sargassum on the shore, about four people work on the beach (two people operate tractors on the beach; two people driving trucks). The total person hours for the peak season would then be 1,680 hours (4 people × 12 weeks × 35 hours/week). During the off season, two people work on the beach (one operating the tractor and one driving the truck. The total person hours for the off season would be 2,520 hours (2 people × 36 weeks × 35 hours/week). Seaweed is collected seven days a week.

Cost Analysis

Table 2 shows the total value for each of the major cost categories of a Sargassum composting facility. The total annual cost to clean the beach and manage the Sargassum compost pile is $386,872. Figure 3 illustrates the share of each of the costs by category. Machinery costs (surf rake, tractor, 8 yd3 truck, bulldozer, and shaker) are estimated to be 77% of the total cost, followed by personnel costs accounting for 23% of the total cost, and finally land costs which constitutes 0.18% of the total cost.

Table 2. Annual cost structure for a Sargassum composting facility.


Value ($)










Division of annual costs associated with managing a Sargassum composting facility.
Figure 3. Division of annual costs associated with managing a Sargassum composting facility.
Credit: UF/IFAS

Equipment Costs – The breakdown of the major machines (Figure 4) involved in the composting operations are the 8 yd3 truck (31%), tractor (29%), surf rake and bulldozer (each 18%), and shaker (4%).

Division of annual cost to operate machinery at a Sargassum composting facility.
Figure 4. Division of annual cost to operate machinery at a Sargassum composting facility.
Credit: UF/IFAS


Land Costs – Land costs account for 0.18% of the total cost.

Personnel Costs – Includes all the costs that are associated with labor and personnel that are needed to run the composting facility and represents 23% of the total cost.


Because of the growing concern of Sargassum accumulation on the beaches of Florida, composting of this seaweed appears to be an attractive option for city and county governments that are tasked with keeping Florida’s beaches in pristine condition. We estimated that the city of Ft. Lauderdale spends $386,872 annually to clean its beaches of Sargassum and maintain its compost pile. Equipment is the major investment to start a compost facility. Although the land allocation only accounts for 0.18% of the total cost to operate a Sargassum composting facility, according to three local governmental officials who were interviewed as part of this study, the availability and access to land, especially in increasingly urbanized southeast Florida, are the main constraints (University of Miami 2022). The land rental value used in this study was based on land zoned for agricultural purposes in southeast Florida and may not represent the value of land in heavily urbanized areas. Additional costs may need to be considered for local governments looking to create a composting facility, such as the additional cost to transport Sargassum to an area farther away than the city of Ft. Lauderdale to access site-specific space for a compost pile. This budget is only meant to be a reference for city and county governments or other entities that are considering composting Sargassum to take into consideration when creating their own program.

Although the budget for Sargassum clean up and composting may seem large, it represents a cost savings from the alternative of collecting the Sargassum and disposing of it. Our analysis of the Ft. Lauderdale Sargassum composting project considered the entire cost to collect the seaweed on the beach and run the compost facility. However, the cost to clean the beach would be undertaken whether the city decided to compost the Sargassum or not. This would be a sunk cost, or a cost that would be incurred regardless of the disposal option used. The additional annual cost to run the compost pile totaled $78,118. This value includes $53,818 for the bulldozer, $10,600 for the shaker, $13,000 in personnel costs, and $700 for land. This value represents only 20% of the cost that the city of Ft. Lauderdale spends on its beach cleaning and composting program. The other 80% is spent on cleaning the beach.

Before Ft. Lauderdale started composting Sargassum in 2010, they spent $200,000 annually on disposal costs, which included the tipping fees and additional transportation costs to take the Sargassum to the landfill located farther away than the composting facility. In 2020, there were about 3,500 yd3 of Sargassum collected and disposed of in the Village of Key Biscayne alone. As a comparison, Ft. Lauderdale collected 4,721 yd3 in 2019. The Key Biscayne Village manager mentioned that the Village spent about $300,000 to dispose of Sargassum in 2020, or about $1,710 per 20 yd3. Using this updated disposal cost, Ft. Lauderdale would have had to spend nearly $404,000 to dispose of its Sargassum in 2019, meaning the city saved around $326,000 by using a compost facility, which was estimated to cost $78,118 to run, rather than disposing of the Sargassum in a landfill.

Composting not only allows these entities to save on the disposal costs but also permits them to create a useful product that has the potential to be used by these entities to offset landscaping costs by substituting Sargassum compost for soil. The city of Ft. Lauderdale estimates an additional savings between $2,000 and $3,000 per year in soil costs, as it uses the Sargassum compost for fill dirt in its parks and roadways. There is also potential to market the product to be used by local homeowners, landscaping providers, and growers. Future research in estimating the value of Sargassum compost based on its nutrient content compared to similar products on the market would provide insight into the potential to sell Sargassum compost to help offset some of the beach cleanup and composting costs. However, more research is needed to understand the safety of using Sargassum compost in orchards or vegetable gardens before such markets can be fully established, as the level of arsenic and other heavy metals in this compost is unknown. Before starting a Sargassum composting facility, businesses and municipalities should check local permit requirements. Sargassum quality should be checked to confirm that it meets local regulatory guidelines, inclusive of levels of heavy metals, in particular arsenic.


Atkin, E. A. 2018. Humans Have Created a New Natural Disaster. The New Republic. Retrieved November 22, 2021, from

Blare, T., F. H. Ballen, A. Singh, N. Haley, and J. Crane. 2022. “Profitability and Cost Estimates for Producing Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) in South Florida.” FE1115. EDIS 2022 (2)

Caribbean Alliance for Sustainable Tourism and Caribbean Hotel and Tourism Association (CAST). 2015. “Sargassum: A Resource Guide for the Caribbean.” Coral Gables, FL, Caribbean Hotel and Tourism Association, 14pp. DOI:

Caterpillar. 2021. Medium Dozers- D4. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from

Easterlund, P. 2016. Kubota M6-111 tractor information. Tractor Data. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from

Edwards, W. 2015. Estimating Farm Machinery Costs | Ag Decision Maker. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from

Land and Farm. 2021. Broward County, FL Land for Sale - 110 Listings | Land and Farm. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from

Langin, K. 2018. “Mysterious Masses of Seaweed Assault Caribbean Islands.” Science.

Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces. 2021. “Learn about Sargassum on Miami-Dade County Beaches.” Miami-Dade County. Retrieved March 7, 2022, from

Ritchie Bros. 2018. Mack GU713 Dump Truck. Ritchie Specs Equipment Specifications. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from

Swinscoe, I., D. M. Oliver, A. S. Gilburn, and R. S. Quilliam. 2018. “The Seaweed Fly (Coelopidae) Can Facilitate Environmental Survival and Transmission of E. coli O157 at Sandy Beaches.” Journal of Environmental Management 223:275–285.

University of Miami. 2022. Technical Awareness Group Meeting. Sargassum Composting. Third Meeting. Virtual Meeting.

United Nations. 2020. “Increase in Sea Temperature Allows Sargassum Weed to Spread in Mexico.” Devdiscourse.

U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2021. Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Retrieved November 23, 2021, from

Wang, M., C. Hu, B. B. Barnes, G. Mitchum, B. Lapointe, and J. P. Montoya. 2019. “The Great Atlantic Sargassum Belt.” Science 365 (6448): 83–87.

Also Available in: Español

Peer Reviewed

Publication #FE1128

Release Date:February 24, 2023

Related Experts

Blare, Trent

University of Florida

Fact Sheet

About this Publication

This document is FE1128, one of a series of the Food and Resource Economics Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date February 2023. Visit the EDIS website at for the currently supported version of this publication.

About the Authors

Trent Blare, assistant professor, Food and Resource Economics Department, UF/IFAS Tropical Research and Education Center, Homestead, Florida 33031; Afeefa A. Abdool-Ghany, Ph.D. candidate, Department of Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida; and Helena M. Solo-Gabriele, professor, Department of Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, Florida 32611.