Skip to main content

Eastern Lubber Grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois) (Insecta: Orthoptera: Acrididae)

Tiare Silvasy andNorman C. Leppla


The Featured Creatures collection provides in-depth profiles of insects, nematodes, arachnids and other organisms relevant to Florida. These profiles are intended for the use of interested laypersons with some knowledge of biology as well as academic audiences.

Introduction

This grasshopper is well known in the southeastern United States, and elsewhere, due to its large size and widespread use for dissection in biology classrooms. Also, it can be of economic importance in Florida. It is one of a few species of grasshoppers in Florida that occurs in large enough numbers to cause serious damage to citrus, vegetable crops, and landscape ornamentals.

The eastern lubber grasshopper is clumsy and slow, mostly traveling by walking and crawling feebly over the substrate. The "lubber" designation is derived from an old English word "lobre," which means lazy or clumsy. This term has come to mean a big, clumsy, and stupid person, also known as a lout or lummox. In modern times, it is normally used only by seafarers, who term novices "landlubbers." The lubber grasshopper is one of only four species in the family Romaleidae found north of Mexico, but there are many other species in South America (Rehn and Grant 1961). Many of the grasshoppers in this family are winged and agile, so it is inappropriate to call all of them lubbers.

Distribution

The eastern lubber grasshopper is limited to the southeastern region of the United States. It is found from North Carolina south through South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida, and west through Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana to central Texas (Capinera et al. 2004).

Figure 1. Distribution of Romalea microptera, the eastern lubber grasshopper.
Figure 1. Distribution of Romalea microptera, the eastern lubber grasshopper. 
Credit: John Capinera, UF/IFAS 

 

Description

Eastern lubber grasshopper is the most distinctive grasshopper species found in the southeastern United States. Adults are colorful, but the color pattern varies. Often the adult of this species is mostly yellow or tawny, with black on the distal portion of the antennae, pronotum, and abdominal segments. The forewings extend two-thirds to three-fourths the length of the abdomen. The hind wings are short and incapable of providing lift for flight. The forewings tend to be pink or rose colored centrally, whereas the hind wings are entirely rose colored. Darker forms of this species also exist, wherein the yellow color becomes the minor rather than major color, and in northern Florida a predominantly black form is sometimes found. Adults attain a large size, males measuring at least 1.7–2.2 inches long and females often measuring 2–2.8 inches, sometimes 3.5 inches. Not only is this large, heavy-bodied grasshopper unable to fly, but it is poor at leaping as well, so mostly is observed walking. However, it is a good climber and often climbs trees to feed on new foliage at the tips of branches.

Both sexes stridulate (make noise) by rubbing the forewing against the hind wing. When alarmed, lubber grasshoppers spread their wings, hiss, and secrete foul-smelling froth from their spiracles (breathing tubes) (Whitman et al. 1991). They can spray toxic chemicals a distance of at least 0.6 inches. The chemicals discharged from spiracles are believed to be an anti-predator defense, and to consist of chemicals both synthesized and sequestered from their diet (Hatle and Spring 1998). The variation in these toxins make adaption to them difficult for predators (Chapman and Joern 1990). Many vertebrate, but not invertebrate, predators are affected (Jones et al. 1987, 1989; Whitman et al. 1992). Their bright color pattern is believed to be a warning to vertebrate predators that lubber grasshoppers are not palatable. Their tendency to aggregate and climb vegetation, especially at night, is another defensive behavior.

Adult eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois), light color phase.
Figure 2. Adult eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois), light color phase. 
Credit: John Capinera, UF/IFAS 

  

Adult eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois), intermediate color phase.
Figure 3. Adult eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois), intermediate color phase. 
Credit: John Capinera, UF/IFAS 

 

Adult eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois), dark color phase.
Figure 4. Adult eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois), dark color phase. 
Credit: John Capinera, UF/IFAS 

 

Black color form of adult eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois).
Figure 5. Black color form of adult eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). 
Credit: Lyle J. Buss, UF/IFAS 

 

Mating eastern lubber grasshopper adults of two color forms.
Figure 6. Mating adults of two color forms. 
Credit: Lyle J. Buss, UF/IFAS 

Eggs

The eggs of lubber grasshoppers are yellowish or brown, elliptical, and 0.4 inches long and 0.1 inches wide. They are laid in clusters, or pods, which consist of rows of eggs positioned parallel to one another and held together by a secretion. Under field conditions, a pod contains 25–50 eggs, with only 1–3 pods produced per female (Stauffer and Whitman 2007). Egg production is greater under solitary than crowded conditions, but pods tend to be clustered, with females preferentially ovipositing where eggs have already been deposited (Stauffer et al. 1998). The interval between production of egg pods by a female is about two weeks. Ovipositing (egg laying) females prefer mixed broadleaf tree-pine habitats with intermediate soil moisture, avoiding both lowland, moist, compact soil and upland, dry, sandy soil (Watson 1941; Kuitert and Connin 1953). The female deposits the pod in the soil at a depth of 1.2–2 inches and closes the oviposition hole with a frothy secretion or plug (Herrman et al. 2010). The plug provides the young grasshoppers easy access to the soil surface when they hatch. The egg stage lasts 6–8 months and the eggs require a cool period, e.g., 20°C for 3 months, to hatch when exposed to warmer temperatures. Typically, eggs hatch in the morning.

Nymphs

The immature eastern lubber grasshoppers differ greatly in appearance from the adults (Capinera et al. 1999, 2001). Their color pattern is so different that the nymphs (immature grasshoppers) commonly are mistaken for a different species. Nymphs typically are almost completely black, but with a distinctive yellow, orange, or red stripe located dorsally, though occasionally they are reddish brown. The face, edge of the pronotum (area behind the head), and abdominal segments of the nymphs also may contain reddish accents that often change to yellow as they mature. When they first molt, the young nymphs may be brownish, but they soon darken to black. Normally there are five instars (phase between molts), though occasionally six instars occur. The early instars can be distinguished by a combination of body size, number of antennal segments, and form of the developing wings. The nymphs are about 0.4, 0.7, 0.9, 1.4, and 1.5 inches long in instars 1–5, respectively. There are 12, 14–16, 16–18, 20, and 20 segments per antenna respectively during instars 1–5. The shape of the wing buds immediately behind the pronotum change slightly with each molt. During the first instar, the distal surface is broadly rounded; during the second instar the edges begin to narrow slightly, point posteriorly, and acquire a slight indication of venation; and during the third instar the distal edges are markedly elongate, point strongly posteriorly, and have pronounced veins. At the molt to fourth instar, the small, developing wings shift from pointing downward to upward and posteriorly. The small forewings and hind wings are discrete and do not overlap during the fourth instar, though the forewings may be completely or partly hidden beneath the pronotum. In the fifth instar, the larger wings overlap, appearing as a single pair and the wing buds do not cover the tympanum (membranous hearing organ). In adults, however, the wings overlap and cover the tympanum, extending posteriorly to cover 3–4 abdominal segments. Young nymphs are highly gregarious but later instars begin to separate. They may climb vegetation during the night.

First instar eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). The segments above the second and third legs bear wing buds, that are hardly visible.
Figure 7. First instar eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). The segments above the second and third legs bear wing buds, that are hardly visible. 
Credit: Lyle J. Buss, UF/IFAS 

 

Second instar eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). The beginnings of the wing veins are visible.
Figure 8. Second instar eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). The beginnings of the wing veins are visible.  
Credit: Lyle J. Buss, UF/IFAS 

 

Third instar lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). The developing wings extend slightly posteriorly and the veins are visible.
Figure 9. Third instar lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). The developing wings extend slightly posteriorly and the veins are visible. 
Credit: Lyle J. Buss, UF/IFAS 

 

Fourth instar eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). The small wings are visible and curved upward. They are above the oval, reddish-colored tympanum on the first abdominal segment.
Figure 10. Fourth instar eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). The small wings are visible and curved upward. They are above the oval, reddish-colored tympanum on the first abdominal segment.  
Credit: Lyle J. Buss, UF/IFAS 

 

Fifth instar eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). The wing extends posteriorly above the tympanum. The adult will emerge after the next molt and have a different, unpredictable color.
Figure 11. Fifth instar eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois). The wing extends posteriorly above the tympanum. The adult will emerge after the next molt and have a different, unpredictable color. 
Credit: John Capinera, UF/IFAS 

 

Eastern lubber grasshopper nymph Romalea microptera (Beauvois), molting and discarding its previous (darker) body covering.
Figure 12. Eastern lubber grasshopper nymph Romalea microptera (Beauvois), molting and discarding its previous (darker) body covering.  
Credit: Lyle J. Buss, UF/IFAS 

Life History

The eastern lubber grasshopper has one generation per year and overwinters in the egg stage. Apparently, they do not have an obligatory diapause (required period of dormancy) in the egg stage, rather they require about 200 days to develop when held at low temperatures (Hunter-Jones 1967). These grasshoppers are long-lived, and either nymphs or adults are present throughout most of the year in southern Florida. In northern Florida and along the Gulf Coast they may be found in March–April to about October–November. The highest number of adults occurs during July and August. Eggs are produced about a month after emergence of the adults. After mating, the male usually guards the ovipositing female, sometimes for more than a day. The timing of oviposition is highly variable. The ovipositing female selects an open, sunny area and uses the tip of her abdomen to dig a small hole in suitable soil. The eggs remain in the soil through late fall and winter before hatching in spring. The young grasshoppers emerge from the eggs, crawl up and out of the soil, and aggregate near suitable food sources. Lubber grasshoppers are often found in damp or wet habitats, but seek drier sites for egg-laying.

Eastern lubber grasshoppers have both vertebrate and invertebrate natural enemies. Vertebrate predators, such as birds and lizards, learn to avoid them due to the toxic secretions released by adults and sometimes nymphs (Chapman and Joern 1990). Naïve vertebrates often gag, regurgitate, and can die following consumption of these insects (Yousef and Whitman 1992). However, loggerhead shrikes, Lanius ludovicianus L., capture and impale them on thorns and barbed wire fences. After 1–2 days, the toxins degrade and the shrikes can eat them (Yousef and Whitman 1992). The tachinid fly, Anisia serotina (Reinhard), can parasitize 60-90% of young lubber grasshoppers (Lamb et al. 1999). These grasshoppers are also parasitized by the sarcophagids, Blaesoxipha opifera (Coquillett) and Blaesoxipha hunteri (Hough). Pathogens identified from R. microptera include Boliviana floridensis (Johny and Whitman 2005, Stauffer and Whitman 2007) and Encephalitozoon romaleae (Lange et al. 2009). Nematodes have also been extracted from lubber grasshoppers, and they have been infected experimentally with the nematode, Mermis nigrescens.

One of the species of parasitic flies (Blaesoxipha hunteri) that affects lubbers. The larvae develop within the nymphs, killing their hosts when they emerge.
Figure 13. One of the species of parasitic flies (Blaesoxipha hunteri) that affects lubbers. The larvae develop within the nymphs, killing their hosts when they emerge. 
Credit: Lyle J. Buss, UF/IFAS 

Habitat and Hosts

The preferred habitats of eastern lubber grasshopper are low, wet areas in pastures and woods along irrigation and drainage ditches, and near ponds that support weeds or semi-aquatic plants. However, the nymphs disperse over long distances and occur in diverse habitats, potentially invading crops and residential communities. They have a broad host range that includes at least 100 species from 38 plant families comprised of shrubs, herbs, broadleaf weeds, and grasses (Whitman 1988). Being gregarious and flightless, large numbers of dispersing lubber grasshoppers can damage crops such as vegetables, peanuts, cowpeas, corn, citrus, figs, peaches, and ornamental plants (Kuitert and Connin 1953). Among vegetable crops, they prefer peas, lettuce, kale, beans, and cabbage relative to eggplant, tomato, pepper, celery, okra, fennel, and sweet corn (Capinera 2014). They commonly defoliate amaryllis, Amazon lily, crinum, narcissus, and related plants in the family Amaryllidaceae. Ornamental plants fed on by lubber grasshoppers include oleander, butterfly weed, peregrina, Mexican petunia, cordyline, and lantana (Capinera 2014). Some preferred wild plants are painted leaf, Poinsettia cyathophora; tread-softly, Cnidoscolus stimulosus; chamber bitter, Phyllanthus urinaria; Florida beggarweed, Desmodium tortuosum; Old-world diamond-flower, Oldenlandia corymbosa; Florida pusley, Richardia scabra; and smooth crabgrass, Digitaria ischaemum (Capinera 2014). They also feed on pokeweed, Phytolacca americana; pickerelweed, Pontedaria cordata; lizards tail, Saururus spp.; sedge, Cyperus spp.; and arrowhead, Sagittaria spp. Having mouthparts best adapted for feeding on forbs rather than grasses, they can completely strip foliage from broadleaf plants (Squitien and Capinera 2002). More commonly, however, they eat irregular holes in a leaf and move to another leaf or plant. Lubber grasshoppers can be damaging but consume less food than some smaller grasshoppers (Griffiths and Thompson 1952).

Management

Integrated pest management (IPM) is the preferred approach for managing eastern lubber grasshoppers (Schowalter 2018). IPM practices include hand-picking, shaking plants or spraying water to remove the insects; growing less attractive host plants; mowing border vegetation to expose the insects to predators and environmental stress; and if necessary, spot-treating aggregations with insecticides. Nymphs and adults dislodged from plants can be placed is water containing a small amount of dishwashing soap and be discarded with other household waste. Alternatively, they can be dropped into a plastic bag and held in a freezer for a few days to assure they are dead. Insecticide treatment is generally not necessary and usually ineffective, especially against adults. They are relatively large insects that can detoxify insecticides sprayed on foliage they consume. However, some insecticides are registered for grasshopper control in Florida. Carbaryl bait is an effective granular formulation made with bran that is eaten by the insects. It is most effective when applied in the vicinity of less preferred plants, as lubber grasshoppers tend to eat favored host plants in preference to the bait (Barbara and Capinera 2003, Capinera 2014). Spinosad is relatively safe for humans but like most microbial insecticides, it is relatively slow acting. Both synthetic chemical and microbial insecticides can be harmful to aquatic organisms and bees so must be used carefully. Information about safe use of insecticides is on the product labels that are listed in crop data management databases, such as CDMS (https://www.cdms.net/), and current state regulations can be verified at NSPIRS (https://www.npirs.org/). Searches can be made for products, companies, EPA registration numbers, and active ingredients. Frequent scouting to detect and eliminate the more vulnerable nymphs is an IPM practice that can prevent subsequent plant damage. Also, most interventions are more successful at low population densities.

Figure 14. Young nymphs of the eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois), clustered on a citrus reset (young citrus tree).
Figure 14. Young nymphs of the eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois), clustered on a citrus reset (young citrus tree).
Credit: John Capinera, University of Florida

 

Selected References

Barbara, KA, Capinera JL. 2003. Development of a toxic bait for control of eastern lubber grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96: 584591. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/96.3.584

Capinera JL. 2014. Host plant selection by Romalea microptera (Orthoptera: Romaleidae). Florida Entomologist 97: 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0105

Capinera JL, Scherer CW, Squitier JM. 1999. Grasshoppers of Florida. http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/ghopper/ghopper.html

Capinera JL, Scherer CW, Squitier JM. 2001. Grasshoppers of Florida. University Press of Florida. 143 pp.

Capinera JL, Scott RD, and Walker TJ. 2004. Field guide to the grasshoppers, katydids, and crickets of the United States. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 249 pp.

Chapman RF, Joern A (eds.). 1990. Biology of Grasshoppers. John Wiley, New York.

Griffiths JT, Thompson WL. 1952. Grasshoppers in citrus groves. University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin no. 496.

Hatle, JD, Spring, JH. 1998. Inter-individual variation in sequestration (as measured by energy dispersive spectroscopy) predicts efficacy of defensive secretion in lubber grasshoppers. Chemoecology 8: 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001808

Herrman DL. Ko AE, Bhatt S, Jannot JE, Juliano SA. 2010. Geographic variation in size and ovipostulation depths of Romalea microptera (Orthoptera: Acrididae) is associated with different soil conditions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 103: 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1603/AN09131

Hunter-Jones, P. 1967. The life-history of the eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois), (Orthoptera: Acrididae) under laboratory conditions. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society, London (A) 42: 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1967.tb00683.x

Johny J, Whitman DW. 2005. Description and laboratory biology of Boliviana floridensis n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Eugregarinida) parasitizing the eastern lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Ortoptera: Romalidae) from Florida, USA. Comparative Parasitology 72: 150–156, https://doi.org/10.1654/4164Jones CG, Hess TA, Whitman DW, Silk PJ, Blum MS. 1987. Effects of diet breadth on autogenous chemical defense of a generalist grasshopper. Journal of Chemical Ecology 13: 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01025888

Jones CG, Whitman DW, Compton SJ, Silk PJ, Blum MS. 1989. Reduction in diet breadth results in sequestration of plant chemicals and increases efficacy of chemical defense in a generalist grasshopper. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 1811–1822. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012268

Kuitert LC, Connin RV. 1953. Grasshoppers and their control. University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin no. 516.

Lamb MA, Otto DJ, Whitman DW. 1999. Parasitism of eastern lubber grasshopper by Anisia serotina (Diptera: Tachinidae) in Florida. Florida Entomologist 82: 365–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/3496593

Lange CE, Johny S, Baker MD, Whitman DW, Solter LF. 2009. A new Encephalitozoon species (Microsporidia) isolated from the lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois) (Orthoptera: Romaleidae). Journal of Parasitology 95: 976–986. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-1923.1

Rehn JAG, Grant Jr HJ. 1961. A Monograph of the Orthoptera of North America (North of Mexico). Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. No. 12. Vol. 1. pp. 231–240. Wickersham Printing Company. Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

Schowalter TD. 2018. Biology and management of the eastern lubber grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Journal of Integrated Pest Management 9:10: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmy004

Squitier JM, Capinera JL. 2002. Host selection by grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) inhabiting semi-aquatic environments. Florida Entomologist 85: 336–340. https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085[0336:HSBGOA]2.0.CO;2

Stauffer TW, Hegrenes SG, Whitman, DW. 1998. A laboratory study of oviposition site preference in the lubber grasshopper, Romalea guttata (Houttuyn). Journal of Orthoptera Research 7: 217–221. https://doi.org/10.2307/3503522

Stauffer TW, Whitman DW. 2007. Divergent oviposition behaviors in a desert vs a marsh grasshopper. Journal of Orthoptera Research 16: 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1665/1082-6467(2007)16[103:DOBIAD]2.0.CO;2

Watson JR. 1941. Migrations and food preferences of the lubberly locust. Florida Entomologist 24: 40–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3491945

Whitman DW. 1988. Allelochemical interactions among plants, herbivores, and their predators, pp. 11–64. In Barbosa P and Letournearu D (eds.) Novel Aspects of Insect-Plant Interactions. J. Wiley, New York.

Whitman DW, Billen JPJ, Alsop D, Blum MS. 1991. Anatomy, ultrastructure, and functional morphology of the metathoracic tracheal defensive glands of the grasshopper Romalea guttata. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69: 2100–2108. https://doi.org/10.1139/z91-293

Whitman DW, Jones CG, Blum MS. 1992. Defensive secretion in lubber grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Romalidae): influence of age, sex, diet, and discharge frequency. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 85: 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/85.1.96

Yousef R, Whitman D. 1992. Predator exaptations and defensive adaptations in evolutionary balance: no defense is perfect. Evolutionary Ecology 6: 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270696