MENU

AskIFAS Powered by EDIS

Trichogramma Wasps Trichogramma spp. (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)

Wael Elwakil, Ethan Doherty, and Adam Dale

The Featured Creatures collection provides in-depth profiles of insects, nematodes, arachnids and other organisms relevant to Florida. These profiles are intended for the use of interested laypersons with some knowledge of biology as well as academic audiences.

Introduction

Trichogramma is a genus of wasps that includes approximately 145 described species, all of which are insect egg parasitoids (Knutson 1998). This means that adult female Trichogramma wasps deposit eggs within the eggs of other insects, which hatch into larvae and feed on the host egg from within. These wasps primarily use moth and butterfly (Lepidoptera) eggs as hosts, but also those of beetles (Coleoptera), flies (Diptera), true bugs (Hemiptera), grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera), dragonflies (Odonata), other wasps (Hymenoptera), lacewings (Neuroptera), and thrips (Thysanoptera). Many hosts that Trichogramma wasps attack are economically important plant pests, making this group of wasps a valuable biological control agent (Flanders and Quednau 1960, Smith 1996). Trichogramma wasps are considered among the most important parasitoid natural enemies of insect pests. However, naturally-occurring Trichogramma populations in cropping systems are often not adequate to reduce pest populations below damaging levels. Therefore, field populations of Trichogramma are often augmented with insectary-cultured individuals, which can be purchased commercially. Trichogramma wasps have been released to control various economic pests of agronomic and fruit crops since the late 1970s (Hassan 1993).

Description

Due to the small size of Trichogramma wasps, they are difficult to identify on-site and without substantial magnification. Some physical characteristics such as body color, length, and the number of body hairs vary depending on body size, season, host, and environmental conditions like temperature. Fragile body structures and loss of curated reference wasp specimens (type specimens collected and stored in museums or university collections) has resulted in many misidentifications of species in the family Trichogrammatidae (Pinto et al. 1983, Pinto and Stouthamer 1994, Knutson 1998, Sumer, et al. 2009).

There are 30 described Trichogramma species in North America. The most commonly collected species in orchards and other agronomic crops in North America are Trichogramma atopovirilia Oatman and Platner, Trichogramma brevicapillum Pinto and Platner, Trichogramma deion Pinto and Oatman, Trichogramma exiguum Pinto & Platner, Trichogramma fuentesi Torre, Trichogramma minutum Riley, Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko, Trichogramma nubilale Ertle and Davis, Trichogramma platneri Nagarkatti, Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, and Trichogramma thalense Pinto and Oatman (Knutson 1998, Orr et al. 1999, Orr et al. 2000, LeBeck and Leppla 2021).

Trichogramma fuentesi, among the most commonly observed species in this genus, is native to the USA, Mexico, Peru, Barbados, Argentina, Venezuela, and Cuba (Pinto et al. 1983, Rodriguez et al. 1994, Zucchi et al. 2010). Within the United States, it has been found in Alabama, California, New Jersey, South Carolina, Florida, Texas, and Louisiana (Paraiso et al. 2012). Trichogramma fuentesi can be found in most annual crop and fruit tree habitats (Zucchi et al. 2010).

Life Cycle

Trichogramma spp. undergo complete metamorphosis, which includes four life stages: egg, larva, pupa, and adult. The time from egg to adult lasts seven to ten days and usually have more generations per year than their hosts. The life cycle can vary in length and could last more than 10 days due to unfavorable environmental conditions. Trichogramma wasps are endoparasitoids, meaning that they complete their development inside their host. An adult female wasp will deposit an egg within a viable egg of another insect, the egg will hatch into a larva, and the larva will consume the host egg from within. After pupating within the egg, a newly developed adult Trichogramma wasp will emerge from the host’s empty egg case and fly away to parasitize (deposit more eggs) in host eggs (Knutson 1998).

Eggs

Adult female Trichogramma wasps drill a tiny hole in a host’s recently deposited egg to insert one or more eggs. She will use her ovipositor to chemically mark the host eggs that have already been parasitized. Evidence suggests that females of some Trichogramma species also inject venom into the parasitized host egg, which causes predigestion of the egg’s contents and facilitates Trichogramma larval feeding.

Larvae

Once inside their host egg, Trichogramma eggs will hatch into larvae and develop through three larval instars within the host’s egg, consuming the embryo and yolk as sources of nutrients. It takes 3-4 days after parasitism for a larva to reach the third and final instar, at which point it deposits dark melanin granules on the inner surface of the host’s egg lining (Figure 1, 2).

Corn earworm egg parasitized by a Trichogramma spp. The parasitized host egg on the left shows the darkened melanin pigmentation produced by the Trichogramma larva within. On the right is an empty previously parasitized host egg casing.
Figure 1. Corn earworm egg parasitized by a Trichogramma spp. The parasitized host egg on the left shows the darkened melanin pigmentation produced by the Trichogramma larva within. On the right is an empty previously parasitized host egg casing.
Credit: Jack Kelly Clark, courtesy University of California Statewide IPM Program
Codling moth eggs turn black when parasitized by Trichogramma platneri.
Figure 2. Codling moth eggs turn black when parasitized by Trichogramma platneri.
Credit: Jack Kelly Clark, courtesy University of California Statewide IPM Program

Pupae

After completing the third larval instar, Trichogramma larvae will have consumed the contents of the host egg and will pupate inside the host egg. Although this insect undergoes multiple generations per year, the pupae may spend cooler winter monthswithin the host’s egg, during which they slow their metabolic activity. Overwintering pupae can tolerate and survive subfreezing temperatures during the cold months of the year.

Adults leave the host eggs as they emerge from their pupae. Males emerging from a parasitized host egg will remain at the host egg, awaiting the emergence of nearby adult females to mate with.

Adults

Overwintering pupae tend to emerge from the host’s parasitized egg as adults in May and June to attack new host eggs. Trichogramma adults are very small (1 mm or less) and have long antennae and small hairs relative to their body size (Figure 3). Trichogramma species are morphologically similar, which makes them very difficult to distinguish. Their forewings have distinct sections and venation, while the hindwings are less distinctly veined. As adults, several species, including Trichogramma fuentesi, are light yellow or yellow with tallow-brown to black markings. In females, the ovipositor is slightly shorter than the antennae (Pinto et al. 1983, Rodriguez et al. 1994).

Trichogramma spp. female on the egg of tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea.
Figure 3. Trichogramma spp. female on the egg of tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea.
Credit: Jack Kelly Clark, courtesy University of California Statewide IPM Program

Oviposition rate, or the number of eggs deposited per adult female, varies with the age of the adult. Unmated Trichogramma fuentesi adult females can still produce viable eggs and usually stop parasitizing after three days as an adult. Mated females tend to stop parasitizing after five days as an adult (Paraiso et al. 2012). Mated adult female Trichogramma wasps can determine which eggs are fertilized with male sperm. More specifically, Trichogramma species are arrhenotokous, meaning that unfertilized eggs will develop into males and fertilized eggs will develop into females. Trichogramma fuentesi adult females prefer to oviposit in younger host eggs, and the sex ratio of its progeny is typically female-biased (Suzuki et al. 1984, Paraiso et al. 2013a). Evidence suggests that many parasitoid wasps, like Trichogramma spp., also regulate the sex of their offspring based on the quality of their egg hosts. For example, unfertilized eggs (that develop into males) will be deposited into lower quality host eggs, while fertilized eggs (that develop into females) are deposited in higher quality host eggs (Charnov, et al. 1981).

Adult Trichogramma females use kairomones (chemical substances emitted by host organisms) to locate moth eggs. Some of these kairomones are sex pheromones used by hosts to attract mates (e.g., bollworm). Factors such as egg shape, size, color, interior chemical cues, and egg surface chemical characteristics may be used by adult Trichogramma wasps in assessing host egg quality and suitability for parasitism. In addition to parasitizing eggs, adult females of many Trichogramma species will also consume the eggs of their host to obtain additional nutrients to fuel their egg production (Knutson 1998).

Unlike other species, Trichogramma fuentesi does not seem to host feed. Instead, adult females devote more time to searching for hosts and ovipositing (Paraiso et al. 2013a). This strategy suggests that Trichogramma fuentesi is pro-ovigenic, meaning that female adults emerge from pupae with all their eggs already developed. However, adult female Trichogramma fuentesi can still benefit from foraging on host eggs (Parasio et al. 2012).

Hosts

Trichogramma wasps are generalist parasitoids, attacking a broad range of diverse host species. Some of the hosts parasitized by Trichogramma spp. include tomato hornworm (Manduca quinquemaculata Haworth), tomato pinworm (Keiferia lycopersicella Walshingham), imported cabbageworm (Pieris rapae Linnaeus), diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella Linnaeus), Oriental fruit moth (Grapholita molesta Busck), codling moth (Cydia pomonella Linnaeus), and spongy moth (Lymantria dispar Linnaeus) (Knutson 1998).

Trichogramma fuentesi is known to parasitize several moths and butterflies in the families Crambidae, Noctuidae, Pyralidae, Danaidae, Erebidae, and Papilionidae. Most notably, this species attacks several economic pests including tropical sod webworm (Herptegramma phaeopteralis Guenée), Mexican rice borer (Eoreuma loftini Dyar), sugarcane borer (Diatraea saccharalis Fabricius), cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni Hübner), cactus moth (Cactoblastis cactorum Berg), corn earworm/tomato fruitworm/bollworm (Helicoverpa zea Boddie), and the tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens Fabricius) (Browning and Melton 1987, Greenberg et al. 1998, Zucchi et al. 2010, Paraiso et al. 2011, Tofangsazi et al. 2014). A few other studied hosts include julia heliconian (Dryas iulia Hübner), common buckeye (Junonia coenia Hübner), painted lady (Vanessa cardui Linnaeus), eastern tiger swallowtail (Papilio glaucus Linnaeus), black swallowtail (Papilio polyxenes Fabricius), eastern cactus-boring moth (Melitara prodenialis Walker), and the moth species (Anomis texana Riley) (Zucchi et al. 2010, Paraiso et al. 2013b).

Economic Importance

Due to their rapid development and broad host range, Trichogramma wasps have been considered as commercial biological control agents to help manage economically important insect plant pests. Several Trichogramma spp. are reared by private companies and sold for augmentative biological control applications (LeBeck and Leppla 2021). Some companies sell single Trichogramma species individually or with a combination of several species. Trichogramma mass rearing requires providing host eggs for adult wasps to parasitize, which commonly include the Angoumois grain moth (Sitotroga cerealella Olivier) and the Mediterranean flour moth (Ephestia kuehniella Zeller), which are themselves reared on wheat and other grain host plants. Despite the widespread availability and efforts, there is some controversy about the effectiveness of Trichogramma wasps as biological control agents.

In addition to commercially produced biological control agents, many Trichogramma species exclusively occur in nature. For example, Trichogramma fuentesi attacks several economically and ecologically important insects. However, this species is not promoted as an augmentation biological control agent. One reason being that Trichogramma fuentesi may attack some native non-pest species instead of pests. While investigating Trichogramma fuentesi as a biological control agent of the cactus moth (Cactoblastis cactorum), Paraiso et al. (2013b) found that parasitism of a native non-target species, Melitara prodenialis, was around nine times higher than parasitism of the target pest species. In some systems, this preference to parasitize native non-pest species could harm beneficial species.

Although not a commercially produced biological control agent, Trichogramma fuentesi can still be an important natural enemy in some ecosystems. Browning and Melton (1987) surveyed naturally occurring egg parasitoids in Texas sugarcane fields and found Trichogramma fuentesi to be the most successful parasitoid of the sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis, parasitizing 78.7% of eggs. Moreover, releases of Trichogramma fuentesi within closed systems, like greenhouses, may be an effective use of this species for augmentative pest management. Although not a greenhouse pest, Tofangsazi et al. (2014) found that Trichogramma fuentesi parasitized over 80% of tropical sod webworm eggs in their laboratory colony, demonstrating its value when confined to a single host species (Tofangsazi et al. 2014).

Over the past several decades, there have been multiple introductions of Trichogramma wasps into the US for classical biological control of economic pests. These introductions are listed below:

  • In 1968, Trichogramma evanescens Westwood was introduced from Europe into southern California and Missouri for control of imported cabbageworm and cabbage looper on cabbage (Waage and Ming 1984).
  • In 1975, Trichogramma euproctidis Girault was introduced from Russia into Georgia for cotton bollworm control on cotton (Knutson 1998).
  • In 1993, Trichogramma bactrae Nagaraja was introduced from Australia into California and Arizona for control of the pink bollworm in cotton (Knutson 1998).
  • In 1993-96, Trichogramma ostriniae Pang and Chen was introduced from China into New York for control of European corn borer in sweet corn (Wang et al. 1997).

In addition to the historical introductions of Trichogramma species, there are also some species currently used in biological control programs (Cônsoli et al. 2010, LeBeck and Leppla 2021):

Trichogramma minutum - native to North America used for control of grape berry moth, cabbage looper, and codling moth in ornamentals, orchards, grape production, and forests (Greenberg et al. 1998).

Trichogramma platneri - native to North America used for control of codling moth and leafrollers in avocados, ornamentals, orchards, and grape production (Li 1994, Smith 1996).

Trichogramma brassicae – native to Europe is used to control lepidopteran vegetable pests such as European corn borer (Babendreier et al. 2003).

Trichogramma pretiosum – native to North America for lepidopteran cotton and vegetable pests (e.g. bollworms and budworms) (Pluke and Leibee 2006).

Effective integrated pest management relies on the incorporation of multiple pest control tools and tactics to reduce pest populations. In many cases, particularly highly disturbed settings like agriculture or urban landscapes, a biological control agent (predator or parasitoid) will not provide sufficient control on its own. Therefore, Trichogramma wasps should be used in combination with other pests control strategies (e.g., cultural and chemical practices) in pest management programs. Trichogramma wasps are generally sensitive to most insecticides (e.g., lambda-cyhalothrin, bifenthrin, and indoxacarb) as well as some fungicides and herbicides (Cônsoli et al. 2010). The toxicity of these pesticides varies depending on the life stage exposed to the pesticide and the rate of application, which can have diminishing effects on the use of Trichogramma in IPM programs (Cônsoli et al. 2010). Therefore, adjusting pesticide use to minimize exposure of products to Trichogramma wasps and other natural enemies is an important component of an effective IPM program. For example, applying systemic insecticides as soil drenches or granular formulations can eliminate contact with host eggs and Trichogramma wasps, but provide control of plant pests feeding on the host plant tissue.

Selected References

Babendreier, D., S. Kuske, and F. Bigler. 2003. Non-target host acceptance and parasitism by Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in the laboratory. Swiss Federal Research Station for Agroecology and Agriculture, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-9644(02)00121-4

Browning, H. W., and C. W. Melton. 1987. "Indigenous and exotic Trichogrammatids (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) evaluated for biological control of Eoreuma loftini and Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidopter: Pyralidae) in North Florida." Florida Entomologist (16): 360-364. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/16.2.360

Charnov, E. L., R. L. Los-den Hartogh, W. T. Jones, and J. Van den Assem. 1981. "Sex ratio evolution in a variable environment." Nature 289 (5793): 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1038/289027a0

Cônsoli, Fernando L., José R.P. Parra, and Roberto A. Zucchi. 2010. Egg Parasitoids in Agroecosystems with Emphasis on Trichogramma. Vol. 9. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9110-0

Flanders, S. E., and Wolfgang Quednau. 1960. "Taxonomy of the genus Trichogramma (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Trichogrammatidae)". Entomophaga 5 (4): 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372951

Greenberg, S. M., J. C. Legaspi, Donald A. Nordlund, Z. X. Wu, B Legaspi, and R. Saldana. 1998. "Evaluation of Trichogramma spp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Against Two Pyralid Stemborers of Texas Sugarcane." J. Entomology 33 (2): 158-164. https://doi.org/10.18474/0749-8004-33.2.158

Hassan, Sherif A. 1993. "The Mass Rearing and Utilization of Trichogramma to Control Lepidopterous Pests: Achievements and outlook." Pesticide Science 37 (4): 387-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2780370412

Knutson, Allen. n.d. The Trichogramma manual. Guide, Texas Agricultural Extension Service, The Texas A&M University System.

LeBeck, Lynn M, and Norman C Leppla. 2021. "Guidelines for Purchasing and Using Commercial Natural Enemies and Biopesticides in North America. EDIS Publication # IPM-146." University of Florida. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-in849-2021

Li, L.-Y. 1994. Worldwide use of Trichogramma for biological control on different crops: a survey. In: Wajnberg, E., Hassan, S.A. (Eds.), Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids. CAB International, Oxon, UK, pp. 37-54.

Orr, David B., Charles P.-C Suh, Kenneth W. McCravy, C Wayne Berisford, and Gary L. DeBarr. 2000. "Evaluation of Inundative Releases of Trichogramma exiguum (Hymenoptera: Trichogramatidae) for Suppression of Nantucket Pine Tip Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Pine (Pinaceae) Plantation." The Canadian Entomologist 132: 373-386. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent132373-3

Orr, David B., Charles P.-C Suh, Michael Philip, Kenneth W. McCravy, and Gary L. DeBarr. 1999. "The Potential for Trichogramma Releases to Suppress Tip Moth Populations in Pine Plantations." Proceedings of an informal Conference The entomological Society of America, Annual Meeting, 34-44.

Paraiso, O, S D Hight, M T.K. Kairo, and S Bloem. 2011. "Egg parasitoids attacking Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in North Florida." Florida Entomologist 94: 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.094.0111

Paraiso, O, S D Hight, M T.K. Kairo, and S Bloem. 2013a. "Host specificity and risk assessment of Trichogramma fuentesi (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), a potential biological agent of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)." Florida Entomologist 96: 1305-1310. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0409

Paraiso, O, S D Hight, M T.K. Kairo, and S Bloem. 2013b. "Notes on the ovipositional behavior of Trichogramma fuentesi (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), an egg parasitoid of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)." Florida Entomologist 96: 1606-1608. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0448

Paraiso, O, S D Hight, M T.K. Kairo, S Bloem, J E Carpenter, and S Reitz. 2012. "Laboratory Biological Parameters of Trichogramma fuentesi (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), an Egg Parasitoid of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)." Florida Entomologist (Florida Entomological Society) 95: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0101

Pinto, J D, and R Stouthamer. 1994. "Systematics of the Trichogrammatidae with emphasis on Trichogramma. In: Wajnberg E, Hassan SA (eds) Trichogramma and other egg parasitoids." In Trichogramma and other egg parasitoids, by E Wajnberg and S.A. Hassan, 1-36. London: CAB Intl.

Pinto, J D, E R Oatman, and G R Planter. 1983. "The identity of two closely related and frequently encountered species of New World Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)." Proceeding of the Entomological Society of washington 85: 588-593.

Pluke, Richard W.H., and Gary L. Leibee. 2006. "Host Preferences of Trichogramma pretiosum and the Influence of Prior Ovipositional Experience on the Parasitism of Plutella xylostella and Pseudoplusia includens Eggs." BioControl 51: 569-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-005-1033-3

Rodriguez, J R, B Pintureau, and M Galán. 1994. "Déterminisme de la couleur des hôtes parasités par Trichogramma fuentesi." Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 70: 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1994.tb00740.x

Smith, Sandy M. 1996. "Biological Control with Trichogramma: Advances, Successes, and Potential of Their Use." Annual Review of Entomology 41: 375-406. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.002111

Sumer, Fahriye, Aydın S. Tuncbilek, Sevcan Oztemiz, Bernard Pintureau, Paul Rugman-Jones, and Richard Stouthamer. 2009. "A Molecular Key to The Common Species of Trichogramma of the Mediterranean Region." BioControl 54: 617-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-009-9219-8

Suzuki, Y, H Tsuji, and M Sasakawa. 1984. "Sex Allocation and Effects of Superparasitism on Secondary Sex Ratios in the Gregarious Parasitoid, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)." Animal Behavior 32: 478-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80284-5

Tofangsazi, Nastaran, Ron H Cherry, Robert L Meagher, and Steven P Arthurs. 2014. "Tropical Sod Webworm (Lepidoptera: Crambidae): a Pest of Warm Season Turfgrasses." Journal of Integrated Pest Management 5 (4): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1603/IPM14014

University of California Agriculture & Natural Resources. 2017. "Identification: Natural Enemies Gallery: Trichogramma spp." UC IPM. October 23. Accessed August 29, 2022. http://ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/NE/trichogramma_spp.html

Waage, Jeffrey K., and NG Sook Ming. 1984. "The Reproductive Strategy of a Parasitic Wasp: I. Optimal Progeny and Sex Allocation in Trichogramma evanescens." J. of Animal Ecology 53: 401-415. https://doi.org/10.2307/4524

Wang, Baode, David N. Ferro, and David W. Hosmer. 1997. "Importance of Plant Size, Distribution of Egg Masses, and Weather Conditions on Egg Parasitism of the European Corn Borer, Ostrinia nubilalis by Trichogramma ostriniae in Sweet Corn." Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata (Kluwer Academic) 83: 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00189.x

Washington State University. n.d. "Trichogramma minutum Riley; Trichogramma praetiosum Riley; (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)." Tree Fruit Research & Extension Center; Orchard Pest Management Online. Accessed August 29, 2022. http://treefruit.wsu.edu/crop-protection/opm/trichogramma-sp/

Zucchi, A Roberto, Ranyse B Querino, and Renata C Monteiro. 2009. "Diversity and Hosts of Trichogramma in the New World, with Emphasis in South America." Progress in Biological Control 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9110-0_8

Publication #IN1382

Release Date:November 4, 2022

Related Experts

Dale, Adam G.

Specialist/SSA/RSA

University of Florida

Elwakil, Wael M.

County agent

University of Florida

Organism ID
AcademicGeneral PublicCommercial

About this Publication

This document is IN1382 one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date October 2022. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu for the currently supported version of this publication. This document is also available on the Featured Creatures website at http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures.

About the Authors

Wael Elwakil, DPM, Extension agent II, UF/IFAS Extension Hillsborough County; Ethan Doherty, graduate research assistant, Louisiana State University; and Adam Dale, assistant professor, Entomology and Nematology Department; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611.

Contacts

  • Adam Dale