Introduction
The Featured Creatures collection provides in-depth profiles of insects, nematodes, arachnids and other organisms relevant to Florida. These profiles are intended for the use of interested laypersons with some knowledge of biology as well as academic audiences.
This is the most common earwig in Florida, and probably the only species that could be considered to be a pest, though it rarely builds to very high numbers. It is mostly known as a nuisance, and the small amount of plant feeding injury it causes likely is offset by its beneficial predatory habits.
Distribution
First found in the United States in 1884, the ringlegged earwig now is widespread in the southern states and in Hawaii. It is also known from many northern states, and from southern Canada. It likely is of European origin and has been transported to many other areas of the world, including both tropical and temperate climates.
Description and Life Cycle
Under greenhouse conditions in Ohio, three generations a year were observed, one each in the spring, autumn, and winter months. A complete generation can be completed in 61 days (Klostermeyer 1942). Thus, under field conditions, it seems probable that at least two generations occur, one each in spring and autumn, at least in warm climates. In Illinois, adults can be found throughout the year except during winter when adults seek shelter deep in the soil. The effects of temperature on development and reproduction were studied by Lemos et al. (2003), and 30°C (86°F) was shown to be more favorable than 25°C (77°F).
Egg
The eggs are nearly spherical in shape when first deposited, measuring about 0.75 mm (< 1/16 in) in diameter. As the embryos develop, however, the eggs become more elliptical in shape, attaining a length of about 1.25 mm (~1/16 in). The eggs are creamy white initially, becoming brown as the embryos develop. Females deposit one to seven clutches of eggs with a mean clutch size of about 40–50 eggs. Total egg production is estimated at 100 to 300 eggs. Duration of the egg stage is six to 17 days. Rankin et al. (1995b) reported production of up to 9 egg clutches within 180 days of attaining adulthood.
Credit: Lyle Buss, UF/IFAS
Nymph
The nymphs greatly resemble the adults in form, differing primarily in size. Wingpads are absent. All instars have 10 abdominal segments. The head and abdomen are dark brown. The pronotum is considerably lighter in color, usually grayish or yellowish brown. The legs are whitish, with a dark ring around the femur. The cerci are moderately long, and not strongly curved. Normally, five instars are found, but six are observed occasionally. Instars are difficult to distinguish, and no single character is completely diagnostic. The number of antennal segments is most useful, though this is mostly effective among the early instars. The number of antennal segments is about 8, 11, 13, 14–15, 15–16, and 14–17 in instars one to six.
Head capsule width is 0.62–0.75, 0.70–0.91, 0.83–1.09, 1.04–1.56, 1.22–1.56, and 1.40–1.72 mm for instars 1 to 6, respectively.
Body length is 3.0–4.7 (~1/8 in), 3.9–6.9 (~1/8–¼ in), 5.7–7.7 (~1/4–1/3 in), 6.7–10.8 (~1/4–3/8 in), 8.7–13.2 (1/3–½ in), and 9.8–12.9 mm (~3/8–½ in), respectively, for instars one to six.
When reared at 21°C to 23°C (69.8°F to 73.4°F), Bharadwaj (1966) reported mean development times of 11.8, 10.6, 13.4, 16.3, 20.1, and 27.0 days for instars one to six, respectively, for a total of about 99 days.
Adult
The adults are dark brown in color, and wingless. They measure 12 to 16 mm (~1/2–2/3 in) in length, with females averaging slightly larger than males. The legs are pale, usually with a dark band around the middle of the femur, and often tibia, of each leg. Adults generally bear 16 antennal segments. The leg bands are the basis for the common name and are readily apparent. The cerci of the adults can be used to distinguish the sexes. In the male, the cerci are more curved, with the right branch of the forceps turned sharply inward at the tip. The males also possess 10 abdominal segments, whereas females possess eight segments.
Credit: Jim Castner, UF/IFAS
The ringlegged earwigs should not be confused with the common winged Doru spp. earwigs (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) which also occur frequently in Florida. Doru earwings have wings, including tan colored bands on the pronotum and front wings. They are important caterpillar predators. Hoffman (1987) and Choate (2001) provide keys to eastern earwigs that contain the Florida species.
Credit: Paul M. Choate, UF/IFAS
Earwigs are nocturnal. Mating occurs one to two days after attainment of the adult stage, and oviposition commences about 10 to 15 days after mating. The adults construct a small cell in the soil in which eggs are deposited. The female drives the male from the oviposition chamber before eggs are produced. The female protects the egg clutch from mites, fungi, and intruders, cleaning and relocating them if necessary. Maternal care decreases soon after nymphs hatch, disappearing after about a week. The female will not tolerate the presence of her progeny once she begins production of a subsequent egg clutch. Adults are long-lived, and capable of living over 200 days.
Host Plants
The ringlegged earwig is omnivorous in its feeding habits, taking both plant and animal material readily. Most plant material eaten seems to be detritus. It occurs as a minor nuisance in southern vegetable gardens and in greenhouses where it will nibble on succulent plants such as lettuce. It is also documented to feed on the roots or tubers of radish, potato, and sweet potato, and the pods of peanuts, though this is normally of little consequence. The ringlegged earwig is a voracious predator of insects and sowbugs, and this predatory behavior probably offsets the small amount of damage done to plants. It is also highly cannibalistic.
Damage
These earwigs cause little direct injury to growing vegetable crops but can feed on both the aboveground and belowground portions of plants. More commonly, they serve as a contaminant of produce, sometimes defecating on leafy green vegetables. These earwigs are important insect predators and are documented to feed on such diverse prey as caterpillars, beetle larvae, and leafhoppers. Although there is not much quantitative data on their relative importance, Calixto et al. (2006) studied the competition of red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with Euborellia annulipes. They showed that suppression of fire ants led to increased densities of earwigs, suggesting that they may be competing for the same resources, and these ants are very effective predators of many insects. Thus, the predatory activities of these earwigs may be more important than the small amount of plant injury that they cause.
Natural Enemies
The natural enemies of ringlegged earwig seem to be undocumented, though they are likely about the same as those attacking the European earwig, Forficula auricularia Linneaus (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), consisting principally of parasitic flies (Diptera: Tachinidae) and fungi. Cannibalism of eggs and nymphs by adults is an important mortality factor.
Management
These earwigs rarely warrant suppression but are easily killed by most residual insecticides. They also take bait formulations consisting of wheat bran, molasses, and toxicant, as well as many other baits (Neiswander 1944). Baits sold for control of mole crickets will also kill earwigs.
Selected References
Bharadwaj RK. 1966. Observation on the bionomics of Euborellia annulipes (Dermaptera: Labiduridae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 59:441–450.
Calixto A, Dean A, Knutson A, Harris M. 2006. Density changes of two earwigs, Labidura riparia (Pallas) and Euboriellia annulipes (Lucas) following fire ant reduction in Mumford, Texas. Southwestern Entomologist 31: 97–101.
Choate P.M. 2001. The earwigs (Dermaptera) of Florida and eastern United States. http://entnemdept.ifas.ufl.edu/choate/dermaptera.pdf (13 November 2002).
Hoffman KM. 1987. Earwigs (Dermaptera) of South Carolina, with a key to the eastern North American species and a checklist of North American Fauna. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 89:1–14.
Klostermeyer EC. 1942. The life history and habits of the ring-legged earwig, Euborellia annulipes (Lucus) (Order Dermaptera). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 15:13–18.
Lemos WP, Ramalho FS, Zanuncio JC. 2003. Age-dependent fecundity and life-fertility tables for Euborellia annulipes (Lucas) (Dermaptera: Anisolabididae) a cotton boll weevil predator in laboratory studies with an artificial diet. Environmental Entomology 32:592–601.
Neiswander CR. 1944. The ring-legged earwig, Euborellia annulipes (Lucas). Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 648. 14 pp.
Rankin SM, Storm SK, Peito DL, Risser AL. 1995a. Maternal behavior and clutch manipulation in the ring-legged earwig (Dermaptera: Carcinophoridae). Journal of Insect Behavior 9:85–91.
Rankin SM, Palmer JO, Larocque L, Risser AL. 1995b. Life history characteristics of ringlegged earwig (Dermaptera: Labiduridae): emphasis on ovarian development. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88:887–893.
