AskIFAS Powered by EDIS

Pharaoh Ant, Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus) (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

J. C. Nickerson, D. L. Harris, and T. R. Fasulo

The Featured Creatures collection provides in-depth profiles of insects, nematodes, arachnids and other organisms relevant to Florida. These profiles are intended for the use of interested laypersons with some knowledge of biology as well as academic audiences.


The ant Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus) is commonly known as the Pharaoh ant. The name possibly arises from the mistaken idea that it was one of the plagues of ancient Egypt (Peacock et al. 1950). This common household ant is distributed worldwide and carries the dubious distinction of being the most difficult household ant to control.


Figure 1. Dorsal view of a Pharaoh ant worker, Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus), feeding on bait.
Figure 1.  Dorsal view of a Pharaoh ant worker, Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus), feeding on bait.
Credit: James Castner, UF/IFAS


In some of the older literature, this species was commonly referred to as the Pharaoh's ant. The correct common name is Pharaoh ant, as determined by the Committee on Common Names of Insects of the Entomological Society of America (Bosik 1997). It is only mentioned here as the junior author still sees Pharaoh's ant on the Web and in industry publications.


Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus) has been carried by commerce to all inhabited regions of the earth (Wheeler 1910). This ant, which is probably a native of Africa, does not nest outdoors except in southern latitudes and has been able to adapt to field conditions in southern Florida (Creighton 1950). In colder climates, it has become established in heated buildings.


The workers of Monomorium pharaonis (L.), while monomorphic (same size), do vary slightly in length and are approximately 1.5 to 2 mm long (Haack and Granovsky 1990). The antennae have 12 segments, with each segment of the 3-segmented antennal clubs increasing in size toward the apex of the club (Smith and Whitman 1992). The eye is comparatively small, with approximately six to eight ommatidia across the greatest diameter. The prothorax has subangular shoulders, and the thorax has a well-defined mesoepinotal impression. Erect hairs are sparse on the body, and body pubescence is sparse and closely appressed. The head, thorax, petiole, and postpetiole (the petiole, or the petiole and postpetiole, in ants is also called the pedicel) are densely (but weakly) punctulate, dull, or subopaque. The clypeus, gaster, and mandibles are shiny. The body color ranges from yellowish or light brown to red (Smith 1965), with the abdomen often darker to blackish (Smith and Whitman 1992). A stinger is present but is rarely exserted (thrust outward) (Haack and Granovsky 1990).


Figure 2. Worker of the Pharoh ant, Monomorium pharaonis.
Figure 2.  Worker of the Pharoh ant, Monomorium pharaonis.
Credit: Division of Plant industry



Figure 3. Lateral view of a Pharaoh ant worker, Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus).
Figure 3.  Lateral view of a Pharaoh ant worker, Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus).
Credit: Jim Kalisch, University of Nebraska-Lincoln


Biology and Nesting Habits

The Pharaoh ant colony consists of queens, males, workers, and immature stages (eggs, larvae, pre-pupae, and pupae). Nesting occurs in inaccessible, warm (80 to 86°F), and humid (80%) areas near sources of food and/or water, such as in wall voids. The size of the colony tends to be large but can vary from a few dozen to several thousand or even several hundred thousand individuals. Approximately 38 days are required for development of workers from egg to adult.

Mating takes place in the nest, and no swarms are known to occur. Males and queens usually take 42 days to develop from egg to adult. The males are the same size as the workers (2 mm), are black in color, and have straight, not elbowed, antennae. Males are not often found in the colony. The queens are about 4 mm long and are slightly darker than the workers (Smith and Whitman 1992). Queens can produce 400 or more eggs in batches of 10 to 12 (Peacock et al. 1950). Queens can live four to 12 months, while males die within three to five weeks after mating (Smith and Whitman 1992).

Part of the success and persistence of this ant undoubtedly relates to the budding or splitting habits of the colonies. Numerous daughter colonies are produced when a queen and a few workers break off from the mother colony. Even in the absence of a queen, workers can develop a queen from the brood, which is transported from the mother colony. In large colonies there may be as many as several hundred reproductive females (Smith and Whitman 1992).

Economic Importance

The Pharaoh ant is a major indoor pest in the United States. The ant has the ability to survive most conventional household pest control treatments and to establish colonies throughout a building. More than just the food it consumes or spoils, this ant is considered a serious pest simply due to its ability to "get into things." Pharaoh ants are reported to have even penetrated the security of recombinant DNA laboratories (Haack and Granovsky 1990).

In some areas, this ant has become a major pest of residences, commercial bakeries, factories, office buildings, and hospitals or other areas where food is handled. Infestations in hospitals have become a chronic problem in Europe (Erodes et al. 1977) and the United States. In Texas, Wilson and Booth (1981) reported an extensive infestation throughout a seven-floor medical center. In ant-infested hospitals, burn victims and newborns are subjected to increased risk because the Pharaoh ant can transmit over a dozen pathogens such as Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp. (Beatson 1977, Haack and Granovsky 1990, Smith and Whitman 1992). Pharaoh ants have been observed seeking moisture from the mouths of sleeping infants and from in-use IV bottles (Smith and Whitman 1992).

This ant infests almost all areas of a building where food is available and infests many areas where food is not commonly found. Pharaoh ants have a wide preference in the types of food consumed. In infested areas, if sweet, fatty, or oily foods are left uncovered for only a short period of time, one can likely find a trail of Pharaoh ants to the food. As a consequence, they cause much food to be discarded due to contamination. Owners have been known to consider selling their homes because of the ravages of this pest (Smith 1965).


Figure 4. Pharaoh ants, Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus), in an electrical switch mechanism.
Figure 4.  Pharaoh ants, Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus), in an electrical switch mechanism.
Credit: Jim Kalisch, University of Nebraska-Lincoln


Survey and Detection

Workers of the Pharaoh ant can be observed on their feeding trails, often using wiring or hot water pipes to travel through walls and between floors. Once a worker has located a food source, it lays a chemical trail from the food to the nest (Haack and Granovsky 1990). These ants are attracted to sweet and fatty foods, which may be used to determine their presence. Pharaoh ants will nest in the oddest places, such as between sheets of stationary, layers of bed linen and clothes, in appliances, or even piles of trash (Ebeling 1978).

Pharaoh ants may be confused with thief ants, bigheaded ants, fire ants, and several other species of small pale ants. However, thief ants have just 10 segments in their antennae with only a 2-segmented club. Bigheaded and fire ants have a pair of spines on the thorax, while other small pale ants have onlyone segment on the pedical (Smith and Whitman 1992).


Figure 5. A comparison of the bodies of workers of the Pharaoh ant, Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus), (top) and the thief ant, Solenopsis molesta (Say) (bottom).
Figure 5.  A comparison of the bodies of workers of the Pharaoh ant, Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus), (top) and the thief ant, Solenopsis molesta (Say) (bottom).
Credit: Jim Kalisch, University of Nebraska-Lincoln



Figure 6. A comparison of the heads of workers of the Pharaoh ant (left), Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus), and the thief ant (right), Solenopsis molesta (Say).
Figure 6.  A comparison of the heads of workers of the Pharaoh ant (left), Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus), and the thief ant (right), Solenopsis molesta (Say).
Credit: Jim Kalisch, University of Nebraska-Lincoln



Figure 7. A thief ant worker, Solenopsis molesta (Say).
Figure 7.  A thief ant worker, Solenopsis molesta (Say).
Credit: Jim Kalisch, University of Nebraska-Lincoln



Control of Pharaoh ants is difficult due to their nesting in inaccessible areas. Treatment must be thorough and complete at all nesting sites, as well as the foraging area. Thus, treatment must include walls, ceilings, floor voids, and electrical wall outlets. Baits are now the preferred method of control for Pharaoh ants and several baits (insecticides) are labeled for indoor ant control. A Pharaoh ant infestation of a multifamily building requires treatment of the entire building to control the infestation. Ants nesting on the outside may be controlled by also using a perimeter barrier treatment (Smith and Whitman 1992).

Baits cannot be placed in just any location and be expected to work. Pharaoh ant trails and their resources (both food and water) must be located for proper placement of baits and effective control (Klotz et al. 2000). Non-repellent baits (such as boric acid, hydramethylon or sulfonamide) should be used, as repellent baits can worsen the situation by causing the colony to fracture and bud. As a result, ant activity will briefly diminish as the new colonies establish, then become a problem as the foragers resume activity (Smith and Whitman 1992).

In addition, insect growth regulators (IGRs) are marketed for indoor control of Pharaoh ants. The IGR is used as a bait, and ants must be allowed to transport the bait back to their nests. The IGR prevents the production of worker ants and sterilizes the queen. Therefore, it is necessary to allow up to several weeks or months (depending on the size of the colonies or number of colonies) for ants to die naturally with the use of IGR.

For more management information, please see the Insect Management Guide for Ants (

Selected References

Beatson SH. 1972. Pharaoh ants as pathogen vectors in hospitals. Lancet 1: 425–427.

Bosik JJ. 1997. Common names of insects and related organisms. Entomological Society of America, Lanham, MD.

Creighton WS. 1950. The ants of North America. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 104: 1-585.

Drees BM, Jackman J. (1999). Pharaoh ant. A Field Guide to Common Texas Insects. (29 May 2003).

Ebeling W. (1978). Urban entomology. Agricultural Sciences Publications, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

Erdos MD, Koncz A. 1977. Experience in the control of Pharaoh's ants in Hungary. International Pest Control 19: 12–13.

Fasulo TR. (2002). Cockroaches and pest ants. University of Florida/IFAS. CD-ROM. SW 157.

Haack KD, Granovsky TA. (1990). Ants. In Handbook of pest control. Story K, Moreland D (editors). Franzak & Foster Co., Cleveland, OH. pp. 415–479.

Klotz J, Williams D, Reid B, Vail K, Koehler P. (2000). Ant trails: A key to management with baits. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. (no longer available online).

Koehler PG, Short DE, Fasulo TR. (2002). Pests in and Around the Southern Home. ENY203. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences.

Lyon WF. (Unknown). Pharaoh ant. Factsheet. (29 May 2003).

Peacock AD, Hall DW, Smith IC, Goodfellow A. 1950. The biology and control of the ant pest Monomorium pharaonis (L.). Department of Agriculture of Scotland Miscellaneous Publications 17. 51 p.

Smith EH, Whitman RC. 1992. Field guide to structural pests. National Pest Management Association, Dunn Loring, VA.

Smith MR. 1965. House-infesting ants of the eastern United States: Their Recognition, Biology, and Economic Importance. USDA-ARS Technical Bulletin 1326. 105 p.

Wheeler WM. 1910. Ants: Their structure, development, and behavior. Columbia University Press. NY. 633 p.

Wilson GR, Booth MJ. 1981. Pharaoh ant control with IGR in hospitals. Pest Control 49: 14–19, 74.

Publication #EENY290

Release Date:September 20, 2021

Related Experts

Fasulo, Thomas R.

University of Florida

Related Topics

Organism ID
General Public

About this Publication

This document is EENY290, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date June 2003. Revised August 2014 and March 2021. Visit the EDIS website at for the currently supported version of this publication. This document is also available on the Featured Creatures website at

About the Authors

J. C. Nickerson; D. L. Harris, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry; and T. R. Fasulo, Entomology and Nematology Department; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611.


  • Elena Rhodes